On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 1:25 PM, Vasiliy Tolstov wrote:
> 2013/4/24 Luis Felipe Strano Moraes :
> >> 2013/4/24 Luis Felipe Strano Moraes :
> >> > we have removed the packaging stuff from the main repositories, and
> the
> >> > idea would be for them not to return there.
> >> >
> >>
> >> Hmm. Why s
2013/4/24 Luis Felipe Strano Moraes :
>> 2013/4/24 Luis Felipe Strano Moraes :
>> > we have removed the packaging stuff from the main repositories, and the
>> > idea would be for them not to return there.
>> >
>>
>> Hmm. Why stuff for arch and spec exists on repos? Why to add debian
>> stuff and au
On Wed, 24 Apr 2013 18:53:34 +0400 Vasiliy Tolstov said:
> 2013/4/24 Luis Felipe Strano Moraes :
> > we have removed the packaging stuff from the main repositories, and the
> > idea would be for them not to return there.
> >
>
> Hmm. Why stuff for arch and spec exists on repos? Why to add debian
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 11:53 AM, Vasiliy Tolstov wrote:
> 2013/4/24 Luis Felipe Strano Moraes :
> > we have removed the packaging stuff from the main repositories, and the
> > idea would be for them not to return there.
> >
>
> Hmm. Why stuff for arch and spec exists on repos? Why to add debian
>
2013/4/24 Luis Felipe Strano Moraes :
> we have removed the packaging stuff from the main repositories, and the
> idea would be for them not to return there.
>
Hmm. Why stuff for arch and spec exists on repos? Why to add debian
stuff and autogenerate needed files (like changelog) via autotools?
>
Vasiliy,
we have removed the packaging stuff from the main repositories, and the
idea would be for them not to return there.
Regarding doing the ppa, we have a somewhat official ppa where we are
keeping the stable stuff built:
https://launchpad.net/~efl/+archive/trunk
If you would like to help o
