Ok, so that explains why that specific detection, it depended on having
FRIBIDI_CFLAGS.
Thanks for your reply.
Tom.
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri <
barbi...@profusion.mobi> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>
> > Hey Vincent,
> >
> > I fi
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 2:48 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> Hey Vincent,
>
> I fixed it (with an hack). For some reason EFL_OPTIONAL_DEPEND_PKG doesn't
> define FRIBIDI_CFLAGS as thus the next test fails (because it depends on
> that one). Please see commit 81385.
>
Hi Tom, this is my macro. It doesn'
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 1:49 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> Hey Vincent,
>
>
> http://build.enlightenment.fr/builders/full-linux/builds/905/steps/compile%20efl/logs/stdio
>
> Look at the detection of Eina_Unicode's size, it says it's 0. This should
> be fixed. It actually shouldn't be detected now that
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 1:55 PM, Cedric BAIL wrote:
> Cedric Bail
> On Oct 15, 2012 8:34 PM, "Vincent Torri" wrote:
>>
>> there are some problems in the current efl/ tree on Windows. I have
>> local changes so could it be possible that you don't commit anything
>> until i finish that ?
>>
>> Btw,
Cedric Bail
On Oct 15, 2012 8:34 PM, "Vincent Torri" wrote:
>
> there are some problems in the current efl/ tree on Windows. I have
> local changes so could it be possible that you don't commit anything
> until i finish that ?
>
> Btw, do we use only openssl and drop gnutls ?
No, their is a with-
there are some problems in the current efl/ tree on Windows. I have
local changes so could it be possible that you don't commit anything
until i finish that ?
Btw, do we use only openssl and drop gnutls ?
Vincent
--
Don'
On 10/10/12 18:45, Lucas De Marchi wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Vincent Torri
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
>> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Vincent Torri
>>> wrote:
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbie
On Sun, 14 Oct 2012 11:40:36 +0200 Ralph Sennhauser
said:
> On Sat, 13 Oct 2012 14:37:11 +0900
> Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>
> > > So again: Either force-disable/force-enable a feature or allow
> > > configure switches for it, automagic just causes more confusion and
> > > more wo
On Sun, 14 Oct 2012 11:40:36 +0200
Ralph Sennhauser wrote:
> Automagic deps are harder to spot and need to be treated as hard
> dependencies in source based distros unless the packager patchs the
> build to add the missing configure option. Binary distros can indeed
> get away without it being a
On Sat, 13 Oct 2012 14:37:11 +0900
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> > So again: Either force-disable/force-enable a feature or allow
> > configure switches for it, automagic just causes more confusion and
> > more work for packagers and users.
>
> more for packagers. less for users. u
On Fri, 12 Oct 2012 15:54:44 +0200 Thomas Sachau said:
> Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) schrieb:
> > On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 21:52:30 +0200 Thomas Sachau said:
> >
> >> Tom Hacohen schrieb:
> >>> On 10/10/12 11:11, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 10/10/12 10:04, Tom Hacohen w
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) schrieb:
> On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 21:52:30 +0200 Thomas Sachau said:
>
>> Tom Hacohen schrieb:
>>> On 10/10/12 11:11, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
Hello.
On 10/10/12 10:04, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> On 10/10/12 11:00, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
>> Hello.
>>
On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 15:17:35 +0200 Vincent Torri said:
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Carsten Haitzler
> wrote:
> > On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 09:37:00 +0100 Stefan Schmidt
> > said:
> >
> >> Hello.
> >>
> >> On 10/10/12 08:12, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> >> >
> >> > what i want is f
On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:39:34 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
said:
> On Wednesday, October 10, 2012, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 09:15:32 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> > > said:
> >
> > > On Wednesday, October 10, 2012, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> > >
> > > > On 10/10/12 10:37,
On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 21:52:30 +0200 Thomas Sachau said:
> Tom Hacohen schrieb:
> > On 10/10/12 11:11, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> >> Hello.
> >>
> >> On 10/10/12 10:04, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> >>> On 10/10/12 11:00, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 10/10/12 09:50, David Seikel wrote:
Tom Hacohen schrieb:
> On 10/10/12 11:11, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
>> Hello.
>>
>> On 10/10/12 10:04, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>>> On 10/10/12 11:00, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
Hello.
On 10/10/12 09:50, David Seikel wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 09:37:00 +0100 Stefan Schmidt
> wrote:
>
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Vincent Torri wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Vincent Torri
>> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
>>> wrote:
On Wednesday, October 10, 2012,
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Vincent Torri
> wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
>> wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, October 10, 2012, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
>>>
On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 09:15:32 -0
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 10:46 AM, Vincent Torri wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> wrote:
>> On Wednesday, October 10, 2012, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 09:15:32 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
>>> > said:
>>>
>>> > On Wednesday, October 10,
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 3:39 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
wrote:
> On Wednesday, October 10, 2012, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 09:15:32 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
>> > said:
>>
>> > On Wednesday, October 10, 2012, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>> >
>> > > On 10/10/12 10:37, Stefan Sc
On Wednesday, October 10, 2012, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 09:15:32 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> > said:
>
> > On Wednesday, October 10, 2012, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> >
> > > On 10/10/12 10:37, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> > > > Magic checks, debug and log level left out here as the
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 2:54 PM, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 09:37:00 +0100 Stefan Schmidt
> said:
>
>> Hello.
>>
>> On 10/10/12 08:12, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>> >
>> > what i want is for everyone please to test the efl tree and look at
>> > configure options a
On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 09:37:00 +0100 Stefan Schmidt said:
> Hello.
>
> On 10/10/12 08:12, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> >
> > what i want is for everyone please to test the efl tree and look at
> > configure options and find things to clean up/remove/whatever. i already
> > think we ne
On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:51:19 +0100 Stefan Schmidt said:
> Hello.
>
> On 10/10/12 10:40, David Seikel wrote:
> > On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:33:30 +0100 Stefan Schmidt
> > wrote:
> >
> >> On 10/10/12 10:17, David Seikel wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:00:54 +0100 Stefan Schmidt
> >>> wrote:
> >>
On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 09:15:32 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
said:
> On Wednesday, October 10, 2012, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>
> > On 10/10/12 10:37, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> > > Magic checks, debug and log level left out here as they seem to be
> > > handled by profiles. Should valgrind support also b
On Wednesday, October 10, 2012, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> On 10/10/12 10:37, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> > Magic checks, debug and log level left out here as they seem to be
> > handled by profiles. Should valgrind support also be handled with this?
> >
>
> I guess.
>
> > Unit tests, coverage and benchmark
On Wednesday, October 10, 2012, David Seikel wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 09:37:00 +0100 Stefan Schmidt
> > wrote:
> > Image loaders are way more complicated sadly as we drag in
> > dependencies here. I would vote for making jpeg, png, gif, bmp, eet
> > on by default.
> >
> > For the others we mig
On 10/10/12 12:30, Martin Jansa wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 10:33:30AM +0100, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
>> Hello.
>>
>> On 10/10/12 10:17, David Seikel wrote:
>>> On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:00:54 +0100 Stefan Schmidt
>>> wrote:
On 10/10/12 09:50, David Seikel wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Oct 201
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 10:33:30AM +0100, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 10/10/12 10:17, David Seikel wrote:
> > On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:00:54 +0100 Stefan Schmidt
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On 10/10/12 09:50, David Seikel wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 09:37:00 +0100 Stefan Schmidt
> >>> wrot
On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:42:21 +0100 Stefan Schmidt
wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 10/10/12 10:27, David Seikel wrote:
> > On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 11:15:47 +0200 Tom Hacohen
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> I think the ideas is to remove useless options, not useful. :)
> >> I'm not really against it, I'm fine with autom
Hello.
On 10/10/12 10:40, David Seikel wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:33:30 +0100 Stefan Schmidt
> wrote:
>
>> On 10/10/12 10:17, David Seikel wrote:
>>> On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:00:54 +0100 Stefan Schmidt
>>> wrote:
On 10/10/12 09:50, David Seikel wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 09:37
Hello.
On 10/10/12 10:27, David Seikel wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 11:15:47 +0200 Tom Hacohen
> wrote:
>>
>> I think the ideas is to remove useless options, not useful. :)
>> I'm not really against it, I'm fine with automagically detecting
>> stuff if packagers don't find this annoying, the real
On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:33:30 +0100 Stefan Schmidt
wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 10/10/12 10:17, David Seikel wrote:
> > On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:00:54 +0100 Stefan Schmidt
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> On 10/10/12 09:50, David Seikel wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 09:37:00 +0100 Stefan Schmidt
> >>> wrote:
>
Hello.
On 10/10/12 10:17, David Seikel wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:00:54 +0100 Stefan Schmidt
> wrote:
>>
>> On 10/10/12 09:50, David Seikel wrote:
>>> On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 09:37:00 +0100 Stefan Schmidt
>>> wrote:
>
>> But I disagree here. Autodetection is even worse in the case for the
>> im
On 10/10/12 11:27, David Seikel wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 11:15:47 +0200 Tom Hacohen
> wrote:
>
>> On 10/10/12 11:11, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
>>> Hello.
>>>
>>> On 10/10/12 10:04, Tom Hacohen wrote:
On 10/10/12 11:00, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 10/10/12 09:50, David Se
I prefer my stripes to be red, white, and blue, thank you very much
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 10:27 AM, David Seikel wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 11:15:47 +0200 Tom Hacohen
> wrote:
>
> > On 10/10/12 11:11, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> > > Hello.
> > >
> > > On 10/10/12 10:04, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> > >
On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 11:15:47 +0200 Tom Hacohen
wrote:
> On 10/10/12 11:11, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> > Hello.
> >
> > On 10/10/12 10:04, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> >> On 10/10/12 11:00, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> >>> Hello.
> >>>
> >>> On 10/10/12 09:50, David Seikel wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 09:37:
On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 10:00:54 +0100 Stefan Schmidt
wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 10/10/12 09:50, David Seikel wrote:
> > On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 09:37:00 +0100 Stefan Schmidt
> > wrote:
> >> Image loaders are way more complicated sadly as we drag in
> >> dependencies here. I would vote for making jpeg, png
On 10/10/12 11:11, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 10/10/12 10:04, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>> On 10/10/12 11:00, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
>>> Hello.
>>>
>>> On 10/10/12 09:50, David Seikel wrote:
On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 09:37:00 +0100 Stefan Schmidt
wrote:
> Image loaders are way more comp
On 10/10/12 11:07, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> Are these things actually released and in the distros by now?
Harfbuzz: probably soon (already?). Fribidi: it's there in debian
stable, I think. :)
>
>>
>> Agreed (wrt the ignoring). Some people have no need for it as they do
>> not utilize multiple lan
On 10/10/12 10:07, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 10/10/12 09:56, Christopher Michael wrote:
>> On 10/10/12 09:46, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>>> On 10/10/12 10:37, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
Image loaders are way more complicated sadly as we drag in dependencies
here. I would vote for making j
Hello.
On 10/10/12 09:56, Christopher Michael wrote:
> On 10/10/12 09:46, Tom Hacohen wrote:
>> On 10/10/12 10:37, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
>>> Image loaders are way more complicated sadly as we drag in dependencies
>>> here. I would vote for making jpeg, png, gif, bmp, eet on by default.
>>>
> Bmp ?
On 10/10/12 11:00, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 10/10/12 09:50, David Seikel wrote:
>> On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 09:37:00 +0100 Stefan Schmidt
>> wrote:
>>> Image loaders are way more complicated sadly as we drag in
>>> dependencies here. I would vote for making jpeg, png, gif, bmp, eet
>>> on
Hello.
On 10/10/12 09:50, David Seikel wrote:
> On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 09:37:00 +0100 Stefan Schmidt
> wrote:
>> Image loaders are way more complicated sadly as we drag in
>> dependencies here. I would vote for making jpeg, png, gif, bmp, eet
>> on by default.
>>
>> For the others we might need to s
On 10/10/12 09:46, Tom Hacohen wrote:
> On 10/10/12 10:37, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
>> Magic checks, debug and log level left out here as they seem to be
>> handled by profiles. Should valgrind support also be handled with this?
>>
>
> I guess.
>
>> Unit tests, coverage and benchmark will be enabled f
On Wed, 10 Oct 2012 09:37:00 +0100 Stefan Schmidt
wrote:
> Image loaders are way more complicated sadly as we drag in
> dependencies here. I would vote for making jpeg, png, gif, bmp, eet
> on by default.
>
> For the others we might need to see what libs distros ship in a
> default installation s
On 10/10/12 10:37, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
> Magic checks, debug and log level left out here as they seem to be
> handled by profiles. Should valgrind support also be handled with this?
>
I guess.
> Unit tests, coverage and benchmark will be enabled for all libs at once
> I suppose.
>
Unit tests an
Hello.
On 10/10/12 08:12, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>
> what i want is for everyone please to test the efl tree and look at configure
> options and find things to clean up/remove/whatever. i already think we need
> to
> remove much more.
Magic checks, debug and log level left out h
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 9:12 AM, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> so everyone by now should know that we are merging all of core efl into a
> single efl tree. in the process simplifying options etc.
>
> please be aware that any changes you make to obj/eo, eina, eet or evil must
> also be done in the efl
ecore-con can drop the flag for enable/disable c-ares support; this should
ONLY be enabled on windows, and it can be detected as such at configure
time. I'd like to say the same about ipv6 support across the board, but
people will likely throw tantrums
On Wed, Oct 10, 2012 at 8:12 AM, Carsten Hait
50 matches
Mail list logo
