Re: [E-devel] eterm & FC4

2005-07-18 Thread Didier Casse
Sorry Mike for the miscommunication. I attached the complete log. :) -- With kind regards, Didier. Yum/apt repository for DR17/EFL: http://sps.nus.edu.sg/~didierbe Didier F.B Casse PhD candidate, Singapore Synchrotron Light Source (SSLS) National University of Singapore. On 7/18/0

Re: [E-devel] eterm & FC4

2005-07-18 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Monday 18 July 2005 04:25 am, Didier Casse wrote: > On 7/18/05, Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sunday 17 July 2005 10:32 pm, Didier Casse wrote: > > > config.status: error: cannot find input file: Makefile.in > > > > Makefile.in doesnt exist because the autotools failed > > > >

Re: [E-devel] eterm & FC4

2005-07-18 Thread Didier Casse
On 7/18/05, Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sunday 17 July 2005 10:32 pm, Didier Casse wrote: > > config.status: error: cannot find input file: Makefile.in > > Makefile.in doesnt exist because the autotools failed > > no idea why exactly they failed, you cut the log after that poin

Re: [E-devel] eterm & FC4

2005-07-17 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Sunday 17 July 2005 10:32 pm, Didier Casse wrote: > config.status: error: cannot find input file: Makefile.in Makefile.in doesnt exist because the autotools failed no idea why exactly they failed, you cut the log after that point ... -mike

Re: [E-devel] eterm & FC4

2005-07-17 Thread Didier Casse
I checked out libast from CVS but the latter is looking for makefile.in which doesn't seem to be around. Any clues anybody? :( Am I missing out something? [SNIP] checking for snprintf... yes checking for vsnprintf... yes checking for strcasestr... yes checking for strcasechr... no checking for str

Re: [E-devel] eterm & FC4

2005-07-17 Thread Michael Jennings
On Sunday, 17 July 2005, at 11:51:51 (-0500), laurence vanek wrote: > I just did a fresh CVS co and rebuilt libast (no issues now). For the > Eterm build I did this: > > export ACLOCAL_FLAGS="-I /usr/local/share/aclocal" > > > as Nathan & you suggested prior to "./autogen.sh". > > It works on

Re: [E-devel] eterm & FC4

2005-07-17 Thread dienekes
laurence vanek wrote: > > I just did a fresh CVS co and rebuilt libast (no issues now). For the > Eterm build I did this: > > export ACLOCAL_FLAGS="-I /usr/local/share/aclocal" > > > as Nathan & you suggested prior to "./autogen.sh". > > It works on my updated FC4 sytem. "make" & "make install" ok

Re: [E-devel] eterm & FC4

2005-07-17 Thread laurence vanek
Michael Jennings wrote: Have you tried setting ACLOCAL_FLAGS="-I /usr/local/share/aclocal" when calling autogen.sh? Michael Michael - I just did a fresh CVS co and rebuilt libast (no issues now). For the Eterm build I did this: export ACLOCAL_FLAGS="-I /usr/local/share/aclocal" as Nath

Re: [E-devel] eterm & FC4

2005-07-17 Thread Michael Jennings
On Saturday, 16 July 2005, at 13:32:10 (-0500), laurence vanek wrote: > libast.m4 resides at "/usr/local/share/aclocal/libast.m4". since I > didnt put it there I presume the "make install" did during my build > of libast. Yes, that's correct. But that doesn't mean aclocal will automatically look

Re: [E-devel] eterm & FC4

2005-07-16 Thread laurence vanek
Michael Jennings wrote: On Sunday, 17 July 2005, at 01:58:46 (+0200), dienekes wrote: Eterm builds and works fine with the commented out line. Did you actually read the comment? If you have to comment out that line, the problem is on YOUR END. As you are so skilled I wonder tha

Re: [E-devel] eterm & FC4

2005-07-16 Thread Michael Jennings
On Sunday, 17 July 2005, at 01:58:46 (+0200), dienekes wrote: > Eterm builds and works fine with the commented out line. Did you actually read the comment? If you have to comment out that line, the problem is on YOUR END. > As you are so skilled I wonder that there is a "eterm & FC4" thread. >

Re: [E-devel] eterm & FC4

2005-07-16 Thread dienekes
Michael Jennings wrote: >Those who cannot read have no business using Eterm. > > Eterm builds and works fine with the commented out line. >No, there is something wrong with Eterm's user. > > > As you are so skilled I wonder that there is a "eterm & FC4" thread. With a working configure there

Re: [E-devel] eterm & FC4

2005-07-16 Thread dienekes
Nathan Ingersoll wrote: >The problem with the configure is that it wasn't able to substitute a >libast.m4 macro when aclocal ran from autogen.sh. Where do you have >libast installed? > > > > > /usr/local/enlightenment/ I modified the value of the ACLOCAL environment variable to /usr/local/enl

Re: [E-devel] eterm & FC4

2005-07-16 Thread Michael Jennings
On Sunday, 17 July 2005, at 00:07:34 (+0200), dienekes wrote: > # NOTE: The following line is NOT NOT NOT NOT NOT a typo! > # If you are having problems with it, libast.m4 is not installed > # or aclocal couldn't find it. Hence the problem is on YOUR end. > dps_snprintf_oflow() Those who cannot

Re: [E-devel] eterm & FC4

2005-07-16 Thread Nathan Ingersoll
The problem with the configure is that it wasn't able to substitute a libast.m4 macro when aclocal ran from autogen.sh. Where do you have libast installed? On 7/16/05, dienekes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Nathan Ingersoll wrote: > > >This is not a correct solution, it's working around a problem

Re: [E-devel] eterm & FC4

2005-07-16 Thread dienekes
Nathan Ingersoll wrote: >This is not a correct solution, it's working around a problem with aclocal. >Try: >export ACLOCAL_FLAGS="-I /usr/local/share/aclocal" >./autogen.sh > > unfortunately this also doesn't help. I also linked libast.m4 to /usr/share/aclocal and /usr/local/share/ac

Re: [E-devel] eterm & FC4

2005-07-16 Thread Nathan Ingersoll
This is not a correct solution, it's working around a problem with aclocal. Try: export ACLOCAL_FLAGS="-I /usr/local/share/aclocal" ./autogen.sh Libast installs libast.m4 which is required by aclocal to substitute dps_snprintf_oflow. The default install path is in /usr/local/share/aclocal,

Re: [E-devel] eterm & FC4

2005-07-16 Thread dienekes
Thererafter I changed # NOTE: The following line is NOT NOT NOT NOT NOT a typo! # If you are having problems with it, libast.m4 is not installed # or aclocal couldn't find it. Hence the problem is on YOUR end. dps_snprintf_oflow() of ./configure to # NOTE: The following line is NOT NOT NOT N

Re: [E-devel] eterm & FC4

2005-07-16 Thread dienekes
laurence vanek wrote: > Im running FC4, any suggestions as to where the "proper location" > might be? Perhaps its > a path issue. I installed libast before I run configure for Eterm in /usr/local/enlightenment where all my E stuff resides. Result: checking for nl_langinfo... yes ./configure: lin

Re: [E-devel] eterm & FC4

2005-07-16 Thread laurence vanek
Michael Jennings wrote: On Friday, 15 July 2005, at 22:18:32 (-0500), laurence vanek wrote: ./configure: line 23460: syntax error near unexpected token `echo' ./configure: line 23460: `echo "$as_me:$LINENO: checking for pow in -lm" >&5' Install libast.m4 into the proper location. Mi

Re: [E-devel] eterm & FC4

2005-07-16 Thread Michael Jennings
On Friday, 15 July 2005, at 22:18:32 (-0500), laurence vanek wrote: > ./configure: line 23460: syntax error near unexpected token `echo' > ./configure: line 23460: `echo "$as_me:$LINENO: checking for pow in -lm" >&5' Install libast.m4 into the proper location. Michael -- Michael Jennings (a.k.

Re: [E-devel] eterm & FC4

2005-07-15 Thread laurence vanek
Mike Frysinger wrote: On Friday 15 July 2005 09:33 pm, laurence vanek wrote: yes, that worked. thank you. added to cvs then As a side note, ./autogen for Eterm generates complaint for configure file. The file lines involved are line number 23460, 23461. Complaining about syntax

Re: [E-devel] eterm & FC4

2005-07-15 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Friday 15 July 2005 09:33 pm, laurence vanek wrote: > yes, that worked. thank you. added to cvs then > As a side note, ./autogen for Eterm generates complaint for configure file. > The file lines involved are line number 23460, 23461. Complaining about > syntax error in the following 2 lines

Re: [E-devel] eterm & FC4

2005-07-15 Thread laurence vanek
Mike Frysinger wrote: On Friday 15 July 2005 12:02 am, laurence vanek wrote: This patch allow me to build libast.but during Eterm make I got: = In file included from feature.h:99, from actions.c:27: /usr/local/include/libast.h:289:19: error: #if with no expressio

Re: [E-devel] eterm & FC4

2005-07-15 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Friday 15 July 2005 12:02 am, laurence vanek wrote: > This patch allow me to build libast.but during Eterm make I got: > > = > In file included from feature.h:99, > from actions.c:27: > /usr/local/include/libast.h:289:19: error: #if with no expression does this work

Re: [E-devel] eterm & FC4

2005-07-14 Thread laurence vanek
Mike Frysinger wrote: On Thursday 14 July 2005 12:19 am, laurence vanek wrote: Of course eterm needs libast to build. I would imagine its gcc4 in FC4. failed same way for me with gcc-4.0.1 on Gentoo ... checked in this patch which seemed to fix the issue for me: Index: libast.h ==

Re: [E-devel] eterm & FC4

2005-07-13 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Thursday 14 July 2005 12:19 am, laurence vanek wrote: > Of course eterm needs libast to build. I would imagine its gcc4 in FC4. failed same way for me with gcc-4.0.1 on Gentoo ... checked in this patch which seemed to fix the issue for me: Index: libast.h