I have a VM With a linux on my WinNT system, But I can make a partition and
Put it to boot, because the computer is in the office, not is my machine (or
almost... not in the way that i LIKE to be).
Maybe I think to use a Cygwin to start... in that way I think is more easily
and less demoralize to
> -Mensaje original-
> De: Wil Reichert [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Enviado el: Miércoles 29 de Enero de 2003 19:01
>
> > > Someone knows a port or patch or whatever to make a E on win32
> > platform???.
> E-sense - http://www.kjofol.org/e/, homepage is dysfunctional tho.
> Looks lik
i think having evas on win32 is something that really should be
considered. the whole UI war, in my opinion, is what is holding linux
back. to have a truely helpful and successful widget set i think a
win32 version is needed. but, of course, this is a problem we should
probably deal with lat
Read and respond to this message at:
https://sourceforge.net/forum/message.php?msg_id=1854432
By: stanbey
I just tried to install ETerm (Eterm-0.9.2-1.i386.rpm) and got some failed
dependencies: libast.so.1, linImlib2.so.1 and libutempter.so.0)
I thought I must have an old version of Enlightenm
Hi all,
Probably a simple question for you.
I downloaded eterm and libast.
Installed libast under the normal path (usr/local)
So my files are in /usr/local/lib/usr/local/bin and also in
/usr/local/include i believe.
But when i ./configure the eterm program it always says:
ERROR:you need libas
Since the add of smart object
the loading of image in evas has a small bug:
if you add two times '/' in a path
evas bug strangely
in e/src/icons.c ,icon_update_state
if I had :
---
sprintf(icon,"%s/%s",e_config_user_dir(),"icon/icons.db");
...
/*--*/
I have tried efsd and when I want monitor
a dir with 'op_list_sort'
I never receive some 'file created', when I had new file, due to the
fact that efsd wait a 'end exist'.
I have looking for in the code, and I have found that in efds_main.c
(handler
On Tue, 2003-01-21 at 07:13, Nathan Ingersoll wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 03:19:55PM +1100, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> >
> > yes.. if renaming is to happen.. NOW is the time. i don't want duplicate fn
> > calls for "compatability" i'd like to keep it simple. i'd prefer to make people
> > have
