On Tuesday, 24 August 2004, at 05:21:23 (+0200),
Marco wrote:
> The "ltdl" library was not checked during configure. I added some
> line in configure.in to correct this.
This is incorrect. The libltdl sources are generated by running
autogen.sh and act as part of the Imlib2 package. You may hav
Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-08-24 15:01]:
> On Tuesday, 24 August 2004, at 05:21:23 (+0200),
> Marco wrote:
>
> > The "ltdl" library was not checked during configure. I added some
> > line in configure.in to correct this.
>
> This is incorrect. The libltdl sources are generated by
I just finished putting together my amd64 based system, and i'm trying to get the EFL
to compile using linux32 emulation. I can get imlib2, edb, and eet to compile but i
have yet to get evas to compile successfully. Currently it fails building the
evas_software_x11_test with this error
"gcc -
Hello,
with this patch Iconbar displays names of the months and days of
the week (and possible other words) according to the current
LC_TIME.
--
Szymon Boniecki
http://dmr.art.pl
--- iconbar_orig.c 2004-08-24 23:52:52.934738096 +0200
+++ iconbar.c 2004-08-24 23:58:
On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 08:15:06 -0400 Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> On Tuesday, 24 August 2004, at 05:21:23 (+0200),
> Marco wrote:
>
> > The "ltdl" library was not checked during configure. I added some
> > line in configure.in to correct this.
>
> This is
On Wednesday 25 August 2004 12:31 am, Chris Boersma wrote:
> I just finished putting together my amd64 based system, and i'm trying to
> get the EFL to compile using linux32 emulation. I can get imlib2, edb, and
> eet to compile but i have yet to get evas to compile successfully.
> Currently it f
On Wednesday, 25 August 2004, at 08:55:15 (+0900),
Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> not anymore. it relies on the system libltdl now.
Yeah, I discovered that after I went back and checked the revert you
committed. Would it help/hurt to put --ltdl on the end of the
libtoolize call? Or should we just ap
On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 21:08:41 -0400 Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> On Wednesday, 25 August 2004, at 08:55:15 (+0900),
> Carsten Haitzler wrote:
>
> > not anymore. it relies on the system libltdl now.
>
> Yeah, I discovered that after I went back and checked t
On 24/08/04, at 21:08 -0400, Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...]
> It
> kinda bugs me that we're now expecting end users to have libtool
> installed
What's wrong with that? Isn't the trio Autoconf, Automake and Libtool a
must in every box?
With kind regards,
Didier.
---
