On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 17:30:16 +1300 jochen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> jochen wrote:
> > Hi guys,
> > I'm have another segfault. CVS of today. It happens when I close an
> > eterm with alt-right -> close. happens every time. Closing with
> > ctrl-alt-x or the close button works however. and it s
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 17:30:16 +1300 jochen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
>
>
>>jochen wrote:
>>
>>>Hi guys,
>>>I'm have another segfault. CVS of today. It happens when I close an
>>>eterm with alt-right -> close. happens every time. Closing with
>>>ctrl-alt
On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 20:13:40 +1300 jochen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> > On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 17:30:16 +1300 jochen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > babbled:
> >
> >
> >>jochen wrote:
> >>
> >>>Hi guys,
> >>>I'm have another segfault. CVS of today. It happens wh
Hi,
This change makes the theme list scrollable - for the time when themes start rushing in :)
It also now uses the widgets/button and scrollbars from the default theme.
If anyone can apply this it would be great :)
Thanx,
-- Chady 'Leviathan' Kassoufhttp://chady.net/
e_utils.diff
Description: B
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 20:13:40 +1300 jochen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
>
>
>>Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>>
>>>On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 17:30:16 +1300 jochen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>babbled:
>>>
>>>
>>>
jochen wrote:
>Hi guys,
Randy Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I've been using the monitor module, and annoyingly it reports >100% cpu
> usage. Here's a simple patch to hide this.
I have just looked at the patch, and as you say it hides the >100%
load, but itsn't this an indication of a more fundamental problem?
On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 20:37:41 +1300 jochen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> > On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 20:13:40 +1300 jochen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > babbled:
> >
> >
> >>Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 17:30:16 +1300 jochen
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 20:37:41 +1300 jochen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
>
>
>>Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>>
>>>On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 20:13:40 +1300 jochen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>babbled:
>>>
>>>
>>>
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>>
On Thursday, 29 September 2005, at 02:21:22 (+0300),
adi wrote:
> i just want to announce the people who are using erme that they
> should update their version... i have created a current version that
> will be updated more often that the "release" versions.
I've created RPM's for erme. You can
Actually, I put those in so we have a more realistic idea of the number
of objects we're pushing around under load. I'll leave them commented
out for now, but I may uncomment them in the future.On 10/18/05, enlightenment-cvs@lists.sourceforge.net
wrote:
En
Hi,
I updated on the weekend, and on my first attempt to open "Files" I got a segv.
When I tried a second time I couldn't reproduce (it displayed the
window full of icons), but after updating and rebuilding again tonight
I've again hit the segv, and I now have a backtrace.
I'll be away from the l
On 10/18/05, David Stevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I updated on the weekend, and on my first attempt to open "Files" I got a
> segv.
> When I tried a second time I couldn't reproduce (it displayed the window
> full of icons), but after updating and rebuilding again tonight I've aga
This happened to me as well, though I was able to cause it more than
once. I am uncertain how the additional times came up(wasn't on the
initial click like the first time).
I will see if I can reproduce it tonight.On 10/18/05, Hisham Mardam Bey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:On 10/18/05, David Steven
I'm somewhat new to this, but my guess would be that the reason this occurs is because we are sampling user system and nice percentages asynchronously. Thus we get, from the kernel (via /proc/stat) something like user and system for time0, but nice from time1, because this file is dynamically bein
Randy Robertson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'm somewhat new to this,
Me too! :-)
> Thus we get, from the kernel (via /proc/stat) something like user
> and system for time0, but nice from time1, because this file is
> dynamically being modified in the time between some of the values
> are read
Hi again,
there is a new version of the calendar module at:
http://home.comcast.net/~nasa01/calendar-18Oct05.tar.gz
This version adds the ability to select the 1st day of the week
and adds support for gettext.
I don't have any .po files, for other languages, (and still need to
learn what to
On 10/19/05, Nathan A. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi again,there is a new version of the calendar module at:http://home.comcast.net/~nasa01/calendar-18Oct05.tar.gzThis version adds the ability to select the 1st day of the week
and adds support for gettext.I don't have any .po files, for other
On Tue, 2005-10-18 at 16:03 -0700,
enlightenment-cvs@lists.sourceforge.net wrote:
> Enlightenment CVS committal
>
> Author : codewarrior
> Project : e17
> Module : apps/e
>
> Dir : e17/apps/e/src/bin
>
>
> Modified Files:
> Makefile.am e_fileman_smart.c e_includes.h
> Added Files:
On 10/18/05, Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thursday, 29 September 2005, at 02:21:22 (+0300),
> adi wrote:
>
> > i just want to announce the people who are using erme that they
> > should update their version... i have created a current version that
> > will be updated more often
On 10/18/05, Michael Jennings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://caos.nplus1.net/cAos-2/ext/autobuilder/i386/00_LOGS/e/e_modules-tclock/
> http://caos.nplus1.net/cAos-2/ext/autobuilder/i386/00_LOGS/e/e_modules-calendar/
I like the notation e_modules_foo rather than a stand-alone foo. Good
choic
On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 20:24:48 -0400 dan sinclair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> On Tue, 2005-10-18 at 16:03 -0700,
> enlightenment-cvs@lists.sourceforge.net wrote:
> > Enlightenment CVS committal
> >
> > Author : codewarrior
> > Project : e17
> > Module : apps/e
> >
> > Dir : e17/apps/e/src
On Wednesday, 19 October 2005, at 10:28:10 (+0800),
Didier Casse wrote:
> Cool! Just a question, shouldn't we add this:
>
> Requires: perl-Gtk2
>
> I find that in Fedora, it can't work withough the perl-Gtk2 package
> in. I'm not sure if with CAos it's somewhere else. Comments?
The automatic de
After a somewhat heated debate in #edevelop yesterday, I decided to
start writing my first E17 code, a module that I like to call emu. Emu
will be developed in two, maybe three stages. While I may be
duplicating, or at least appear to be duplicating, some effort, raster
seemed to think stage one
As promised, here's a look at what the current development plan is for EWL.
Constructor API:I have never liked the parameter inconsistency in
the widget constructor calls, but have been content to support them as
people are used to it from other toolkits, and it can save them some
extra lines of c
David Seikel wrote:
After a somewhat heated debate in #edevelop yesterday, I decided to
start writing my first E17 code, a module that I like to call emu.
Wish I'd seen that, have a log?
Emu will eventually be a generic scriptable E17 module who's purpose in
life is to allow people to wri
On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 22:41:21 -0700 shadoi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >After a somewhat heated debate in #edevelop yesterday, I decided to
> >start writing my first E17 code, a module that I like to call emu.
>
> Wish I'd seen that, have a log?
I always keep IRC logs. I'll send it to you pri
On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 15:59:41 +1000 David Seikel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 22:41:21 -0700 shadoi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > >After a somewhat heated debate in #edevelop yesterday, I decided to
> > >start writing my first E17 code, a module that I like to call
> > >emu.
On 10/19/05, dan sinclair <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Would making this follow the thumbnail spec not make more sense, then we
> wouldn't have to repeat all the work of re-thumbnailing things that are
> already done. (You could re-use the thumbs for backgrounds that emblem
> creates for instance
On Wed, 19 Oct 2005 15:59:41 +1000 David Seikel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled:
> On Tue, 18 Oct 2005 22:41:21 -0700 shadoi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > >After a somewhat heated debate in #edevelop yesterday, I decided to
> > >start writing my first E17 code, a module that I like to call emu.
29 matches
Mail list logo