in. rev 65950
thank you.
-Regards, Hermet-
-Original Message-
From: "PRINCE KUMAR DUBEY"
To:
"enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net"
Cc:
Sent: 11-12-05(월) 22:14:12
Subject: Re:
Does it need to use layout? how about box?
and Don't please mix your changes in one patch.
-Regards, Hermet-
-Original Message-
From: "PRINCE KUMAR DUBEY"
To:
"enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net"
On Fri, 04 Nov 2011 06:26:10 + (GMT) SHILPAONKAR SINGH
said:
in general i think the idea is sound. the devil will be in the details of
implementation.
> Hi All,
>
> There is a plan to make elm_viewedit widget.
> The concept of this widget is shifting between light weight viewable widget
>
On 06/12/11 10:55, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> in general i think the idea is sound. the devil will be in the details of
> implementation.
My biggest worry, is that it can easily cause redundancy.
Many things will have to be implemented again and kept in sync.
--
Tom.
---
On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 13:05:19 + (GMT) PRINCE KUMAR DUBEY
said:
thanks muchly in svn! :)
> Hi,
>
> On behalf of Rajeev Ranjan, I am submitting the elm_slideshow patch which add
> support for getting notification when transition completes. Change Log:
> new signal “transition,end” has been
On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 13:06:27 + (GMT) PRINCE KUMAR DUBEY
said:
>
> Hi,
>
> Attachment to the mail is elm_conform patch.
> Change Log:
> 1. Focus chain issue fix by inserting elm_layout in hierarchy .
i think this is a bit of a hack... i don't like this. so reject because of
this. i think co
On Tue, 06 Dec 2011 11:04:11 +0200 Tom Hacohen
said:
> On 06/12/11 10:55, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> > in general i think the idea is sound. the devil will be in the details of
> > implementation.
>
> My biggest worry, is that it can easily cause redundancy.
>
> Many things will
Then use a box. Box does not need more style and simple to use.
Thank you.
-Regards, Hermet-
-Original Message-
From: "Carsten Haitzler"
To: "Enlightenment developer
list"
Cc: "PRINCE
On Tue, 06 Dec 2011 18:31:48 +0900 ChunEon Park said:
i'd say - don't use anything. elm_conformant should be doing this by itself just
like layout, box, frame etc. manage it too.
> Then use a box. Box does not need more style and simple to use.
> Thank you.
> ---
Yeah I remember we concluded to put the docs in header file.
The vote was like 50/50.
Daniel Juyung Seo (SeoZ)
On Dec 6, 2011 3:02 PM, "Carsten Haitzler" wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Dec 2011 00:57:41 -0500 Michael Blumenkrantz
> said:
>
> > On Tue, 6 Dec 2011 06:53:48 +0100
> > Vincent Torri wrote:
> >
Hi all,
I just took the time to list all the build option and the runtime
option I know inside EFL. You will find them listed here:
http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/wiki/Compilation for the build option
and here : http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/wiki/Environment for the
runtime option. As this w
On 06/12/11 15:19, Cedric BAIL wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I just took the time to list all the build option and the runtime
> option I know inside EFL. You will find them listed here:
> http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/wiki/Compilation for the build option
> and here : http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/
May be I didn't explain the problem properly.
The issue is:
focus is not traversing from parent window through conformant to its content or
vice versa.
Since, conformant is an edje object, focus chain breaks here.
For that, I added elm_layout widget so, in widget hierarchy focus can traverse
from
On Tue, 6 Dec 2011 18:49:22 +0900
Daniel Juyung Seo wrote:
> Yeah I remember we concluded to put the docs in header file.
> The vote was like 50/50.
>
> Daniel Juyung Seo (SeoZ)
> On Dec 6, 2011 3:02 PM, "Carsten Haitzler" wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 6 Dec 2011 00:57:41 -0500 Michael Blumenkrantz
> >
Dear Myungjae,
I'm sorry for my overly late response. I was swamped with other stuff
recently and only now got to this.
After the intro, time to get to business: :P
On 25/11/11 02:17, 이명재 wrote:
> After applying the previous changeset 64721, the cursor geometry is wrong
> in a char-wrapped or a
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Enlightenment SVN <
no-re...@enlightenment.org> wrote:
> Log:
> eina: fix system header usage.
>
>
> Author: cedric
> Date: 2011-12-06 08:57:28 -0800 (Tue, 06 Dec 2011)
> New Revision: 65969
> Trac: http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/changeset/659
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 6:19 PM, Vincent Torri wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Enlightenment SVN <
> no-re...@enlightenment.org> wrote:
>
>> Log:
>> eina: fix system header usage.
>>
>>
>> Author: cedric
>> Date: 2011-12-06 08:57:28 -0800 (Tue, 06 Dec 2011)
>> New Revision: 6
This is cool!!
Please update ElementaryChanges wiki page for elementary API or
whatever changes.
http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/wiki/ElementaryChanges
I just saw the elm_index code and there are a lot to be fixed in elm_index :(
This will be done soon :)
Thanks.
Daniel Juyung Soe (SeoZ)
On Tue,
On Tue, 06 Dec 2011 15:57:15 +0200 Tom Hacohen
said:
> On 06/12/11 15:19, Cedric BAIL wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I just took the time to list all the build option and the runtime
> > option I know inside EFL. You will find them listed here:
> > http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/wiki/Compilation
On Tue, 6 Dec 2011 14:19:01 +0100 Cedric BAIL said:
> Hi all,
>
>I just took the time to list all the build option and the runtime
> option I know inside EFL. You will find them listed here:
> http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/wiki/Compilation for the build option
> and here : http://trac.enli
On Tue, 06 Dec 2011 14:48:16 + (GMT) PRINCE KUMAR DUBEY
said:
> May be I didn't explain the problem properly.
> The issue is:
> focus is not traversing from parent window through conformant to its content
> or vice versa. Since, conformant is an edje object, focus chain breaks here.
> For tha
On Tue, 6 Dec 2011 09:49:27 -0500 Michael Blumenkrantz
said:
> On Tue, 6 Dec 2011 18:49:22 +0900
> Daniel Juyung Seo wrote:
>
> > Yeah I remember we concluded to put the docs in header file.
> > The vote was like 50/50.
> >
> > Daniel Juyung Seo (SeoZ)
> > On Dec 6, 2011 3:02 PM, "Carsten Hait
SOUNDS AWESOME!
But I can't test it :( I got segv when I ran 'exactness -r'
Anyhow, this is so nice and every widget developer have to use it and
test with it.
Thanks.
Daniel Juyung Seo (SeoZ)
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 1:05 AM, Enlightenment SVN
wrote:
> Log:
> Exactness: initial commit.
>
> (Comm
Hello ~ Prince.
With current elm_conformant's codes, focus tree doesn't have any problem
because,
every content, which is set by elm_conformant_content_set_func, will be a
sub-object of elm_conformant.
(you can check elm_widget_sub_object_add in _content_set_hook function)
I cannot remember
Dear, Tom, Raster and EFL people.
Now I'm trying to reduce the code diffs between EFL svn and my company's
local git repository.
I'm sending you entry-related patches continuously those are specialized in
mobile environment such as selection handlers and magnifier.
First, I attached edje entry pa
The problem is how focus will pass from parent through conformant (an edje
object) to its children and vice-versa.
Thanks.
--- Original Message ---
Sender : ???
Date : Dec 07, 2011 07:41 (GMT+05:30)
Title : RE: Re: [E-devel] [Patch] elm_conform patch
Hello ~ Prince.
With current elm_con
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 4:52 AM, Myungjae Lee wrote:
> Dear, Tom, Raster and EFL people.
>
> Now I'm trying to reduce the code diffs between EFL svn and my company's
> local git repository.
> I'm sending you entry-related patches continuously those are specialized in
> mobile environment such as s
As the author of illume stuff, this is a hack. I agree. Fix it proper,
or don't fix it. As always, patches are welcome...but improper patches
do get rejected. Using 'layout' to "Avoid" the problem is no solution.
dh
On 12/06/11 19:00, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Tue, 06 Dec
Ahmen, but are they not included already via 'private' headers ? I'm
finding that (in the EFL) most needed headers are pretty much already
there.
dh
On 12/06/11 19:49, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
> Log:
> let's not fail to include standard headers when we need things like..
>ooh.. malloc?
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 8:21 AM, Vincent Torri wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 4:52 AM, Myungjae Lee wrote:
>
>> Dear, Tom, Raster and EFL people.
>>
>> Please review this patch and apply it if it's acceptable.
>> Or if you have any opinion for this feel free to give me a feedback.
>>
>
> i've
On 12/06/11 20:10, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
> Log:
> NO! you break api. you made my e sit here with a segv in a getenv.
>because now many libraries and api's don't have prototyopes for
>malloc/calloc and much more and this goes horribly wrong especially on
>64bit! the eina headers have
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 8:26 AM, Vincent Torri wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 8:21 AM, Vincent Torri wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 4:52 AM, Myungjae Lee wrote:
>>
>>> Dear, Tom, Raster and EFL people.
>>>
>>> Please review this patch and apply it if it's acceptable.
>>> Or if you h
32 matches
Mail list logo