I'm looking at the edje docs on the web site, they are from 15 or 16
months ago. WTF?
--
A big old stinking pile of genius that no one wants
coz there are too many silver coated monkeys in the world.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-
On Tuesday 27 March 2012 20:42:46 David Seikel wrote:
> I'm looking at the edje docs on the web site, they are from 15 or 16
> months ago. WTF?
Says on the bottom right corner of the page:
"Docs generated Mon Mar 26 2012 00:28:07"
What makes you say the docs are old?
Gastal
On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 08:58:25 -0300 "Jonas M. Gastal"
wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 March 2012 20:42:46 David Seikel wrote:
> > I'm looking at the edje docs on the web site, they are from 15 or 16
> > months ago. WTF?
>
> Says on the bottom right corner of the page:
> "Docs generated Mon Mar 26 2012 00
Oops, when we added EET_DATA_DESCRIPTOR_ADD_BASIC_ARRAY, we should
have added a EET_DATA_DESCRIPTOR_ADD_BASIC_VAR_ARRAY version as well.
If I remember, I did that.
Is it too late to add that API, or does it not count since it's a macro?
--
A big old stinking pile of genius that no one wants
coz
On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 22:43:08 +1000 David Seikel said:
no one has updated the wiki in that time. yes. this is part of our problem.
too many different places that we put documentation or just information. a lot
of docs have moved to the doxy generated ones to improve this (as it also sits
within th
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 3:18 PM, David Seikel wrote:
> Oops, when we added EET_DATA_DESCRIPTOR_ADD_BASIC_ARRAY, we should
> have added a EET_DATA_DESCRIPTOR_ADD_BASIC_VAR_ARRAY version as well.
>
> If I remember, I did that.
I am not sure we handle in eet code more than a VAR_ARRAY_STRING, but
I
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Carsten Haitzler wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 22:43:08 +1000 David Seikel said:
>
> no one has updated the wiki in that time. yes. this is part of our problem.
> too many different places that we put documentation or just information. a lot
> of docs have moved t
On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 11:27:32 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Carsten Haitzler
> wrote:
> > On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 22:43:08 +1000 David Seikel
> > said:
> >
> > no one has updated the wiki in that time. yes. this is part of our
> > problem. too many differe
On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 16:24:28 +0200 Cedric BAIL
wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 3:18 PM, David Seikel
> wrote:
> > Oops, when we added EET_DATA_DESCRIPTOR_ADD_BASIC_ARRAY, we should
> > have added a EET_DATA_DESCRIPTOR_ADD_BASIC_VAR_ARRAY version as
> > well.
> >
> > If I remember, I did that.
>
On Wednesday 28 March 2012 00:36:18 David Seikel wrote:
> The point I'm making is that it used to show the generated docs from
> the About page, at least I'm pretty sure it did. Now it's showing the
> old wiki docs. Something changed? If so, it should get changed back.
Well, I'm not aware that i
On 03/26/2012 10:18 AM, Simon Lees wrote:
>
>
> Original Message
> Subject: E SVN: discomfitor trunk/web/www/p/download
> Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2012 07:38:01 +1030
> From: Enlightenment SVN
> Reply-To: enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>
> To: enl
This has been confirmed by quite a few people over at Bodhi Forums.
Enabling E Notifications is causing a dbus error to come up upon shutting
down/rebooting. The error reads:
"Error during DBus init! Please check if
dbus is correctly installed and running."
The error flashes really fast, fast
On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 13:38:29 -0700
Joel Madero wrote:
> This has been confirmed by quite a few people over at Bodhi Forums.
>
> Enabling E Notifications is causing a dbus error to come up upon shutting
> down/rebooting. The error reads:
>
> "Error during DBus init! Please check if
> dbus is cor
E displays a popup notification that says something along the lines of:
"Error during DBus init! Please check if
dbus is correctly installed and running"
As the system shuts down, it is harmless and the system still quickly shuts
down (which is why it is hard to say exactly what the massage says)
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 23:52, Jeff Hoogland wrote:
> E displays a popup notification that says something along the lines of:
>
> "Error during DBus init! Please check if
> dbus is correctly installed and running"
>
> As the system shuts down, it is harmless and the system still quickly shuts
> do
On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 00:36:18 +1000 David Seikel said:
> On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 11:27:32 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Carsten Haitzler
> > wrote:
> > > On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 22:43:08 +1000 David Seikel
> > > said:
> > >
> > > no one has updated the
As Jeff said, it's been pointed out by at least 10 or so people over at
Bodhi forums so it's not just my system. I'm experiencing it on three
systems myself
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 3:01 PM, thomasg wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 23:52, Jeff Hoogland
> wrote:
> > E displays a popup notificatio
On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 16:56:05 -0700
Joel Madero wrote:
> As Jeff said, it's been pointed out by at least 10 or so people over at
> Bodhi forums so it's not just my system. I'm experiencing it on three
> systems myself
>
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 3:01 PM, thomasg wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Mar 27, 201
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 01:56, Joel Madero wrote:
> As Jeff said, it's been pointed out by at least 10 or so people over at
> Bodhi forums so it's not just my system. I'm experiencing it on three
> systems myself
>
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 3:01 PM, thomasg wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 23:
I guess that is just how Ubuntu shutdown order goes.
Is it decided then that this is an issue with the shutdown order and not an
E-related thing?
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 6:59 PM, Michael Blumenkrantz <
michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 16:56:05 -0700
> Joel Madero wro
Now that it's been pointed out I remember vaguely reading a critical piece
against Ubuntu for decreasing shutdown times by using some method that
shuts down services incorrectly.
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 5:02 PM, Jeff Hoogland wrote:
> I guess that is just how Ubuntu shutdown order goes.
>
> I
Thats fine - I'll just comment this error message out of the E code at
compile time then. It literally only pops up for half a second at shut
down.
It ONLY happens with the new E notification module though.
It DOES NOT happen when using other notification daemons such as notify-osd.
That lead me
On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 19:02:42 -0500
Jeff Hoogland wrote:
> I guess that is just how Ubuntu shutdown order goes.
>
> Is it decided then that this is an issue with the shutdown order and not an
> E-related thing?
>
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 6:59 PM, Michael Blumenkrantz <
> michael.blumenkra...@gm
On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 19:05:20 -0500
Jeff Hoogland wrote:
> Thats fine - I'll just comment this error message out of the E code at
> compile time then. It literally only pops up for half a second at shut
> down.
>
> It ONLY happens with the new E notification module though.
>
> It DOES NOT happen
On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 13:38:29 -0700 Joel Madero said:
> This has been confirmed by quite a few people over at Bodhi Forums.
>
> Enabling E Notifications is causing a dbus error to come up upon shutting
> down/rebooting. The error reads:
>
> "Error during DBus init! Please check if
> dbus is corr
On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 19:05:20 -0500 Jeff Hoogland said:
> Thats fine - I'll just comment this error message out of the E code at
> compile time then. It literally only pops up for half a second at shut
> down.
>
> It ONLY happens with the new E notification module though.
>
> It DOES NOT happen
On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 19:15:51 -0500
Jeff Hoogland wrote:
> This is exactly the case - what should I investigate?
>
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 7:14 PM, Michael Blumenkrantz <
> michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 19:05:20 -0500
> > Jeff Hoogland wrote:
> >
> > > Thats
For #1 I take blame for incomplete bug report, I'm trying to get more
involved and I try to include what I think is helpful. It's a learning
process and I hope you bare with me. Jeff has been slowly helping me be
more complete and accurate with my reporting.
for #3.well, stop emailing and star
On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 19:05:20 -0500 Jeff Hoogland said:
wait... i just had an idea... is something SENDING e a HUP signal during
shutdown? one of the shutdown scripts? sending e a HUP signal (killall -HUP
enlightenment) tells e to RESTART. (HUP is a common signal used for this -
telling daemons to
On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 20:30:19 -0400 Michael Blumenkrantz
said:
> On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 19:15:51 -0500
> Jeff Hoogland wrote:
>
> > This is exactly the case - what should I investigate?
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 7:14 PM, Michael Blumenkrantz <
> > michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 09:36:41 +0900
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 20:30:19 -0400 Michael Blumenkrantz
> said:
>
> > On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 19:15:51 -0500
> > Jeff Hoogland wrote:
> >
> > > This is exactly the case - what should I investigate?
> > >
> > > On Tue, M
On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 20:38:39 -0400 Michael Blumenkrantz
said:
> > > things you should investigate:
> > > 1) why the initial bug report was entirely faulty and incomplete
> > > 2) the results of sending a backtrace produced by running e17 compiled
> > > with this really bad patch I've attached
> >
2012/3/27 Vikram Narayanan :
> On 3/27/2012 12:37 AM, Michael Blumenkrantz wrote:
>> On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 00:21:19 +0530
>> Vikram Narayanan wrote:
>>
>>> In ecrire,
>>> Check return values of *alloc functions, though its unlikely to
>>> fail. There are chances though!
>>>
>>> Comments please.
>>>
On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 09:45:59 +0900
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 20:38:39 -0400 Michael Blumenkrantz
> said:
>
> > > > things you should investigate:
> > > > 1) why the initial bug report was entirely faulty and incomplete
> > > > 2) the results of sending a back
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 10:08 PM, Michael Blumenkrantz
wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 09:45:59 +0900
> Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 20:38:39 -0400 Michael Blumenkrantz
>> said:
>>
>> > > > things you should investigate:
>> > > > 1) why the initial bug report was
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 10:46 PM, Lucas De Marchi
wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 10:08 PM, Michael Blumenkrantz
> wrote:
>> On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 09:45:59 +0900
>> Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 20:38:39 -0400 Michael Blumenkrantz
>>> said:
>>>
>>> > > > thin
Dear All, Hello.
Please review the previous patch first which is related with the WIN key.
Even though there is no answer to the previous question, I have made
and attached a patch to fire the mouse-up event when you hold down
keys which make WM_CHAR and WM_SYSCHAR.
Please review the patch and giv
On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 08:41:00 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 00:36:18 +1000 David Seikel
> said:
>
> > On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 11:27:32 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 11:17 AM, Carsten Haitzler
> > > wrote:
> > > >
On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 00:40:33 +1000 David Seikel
wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 16:24:28 +0200 Cedric BAIL
> wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 3:18 PM, David Seikel
> > wrote:
> > > Oops, when we added EET_DATA_DESCRIPTOR_ADD_BASIC_ARRAY, we should
> > > have added a EET_DATA_DESCRIPTOR_ADD_BA
I'll try rebuilding E with that line commented out and see what happens -
thanks for putting some thought towards the issues.
Love you E folks :)
On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 9:21 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri <
barbi...@profusion.mobi> wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 27, 2012 at 10:46 PM, Lucas De Marchi
> wro
On Tue, 27 Mar 2012 22:51:18 -0500 Jeff Hoogland said:
well i mostly put bafflement towards the issue and scratched my head going
"wtf? how can this be?". the hup thing came to mind as a possible way e could
go thru an init process again...
> I'll try rebuilding E with that line commented out an
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 2:51 AM, Enlightenment SVN
wrote:
> Log:
> elm examples: Define __UNUSED__ when HAVE_CONFIG_H is not defined.
btw, config.h (here elementary_config.h) must always be the first
header to be included. It's not the case in the examples
Vincent
>
> Author: seoz
> Date:
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 4:23 AM, Kim Shinwoo wrote:
> Dear All, Hello.
>
> Please review the previous patch first which is related with the WIN key.
it's already in svn :-)
> Even though there is no answer to the previous question, I have made
> and attached a patch to fire the mouse-up event wh
the exploratory email for my new potential project: some sort of evas effects
library
such a library would basically be evas (NOT elm) bound to ecore
animators in various ways, providing a simple api to do something like
effectapi_rotate(obj, EFFECTAPI_ROTATE_CW, 270, 3.0);
for a 270 degree cloc
Dear all,
I added one line to fix the bug at tree effect. If the item is equal to
expanded_next_item, expanded_next_item set to NULL in _item_del
Thanks,
Joey
Index: src/lib/elm_genlist.c
===
--- src/lib/elm_genlist.c (revision 69689
On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 01:31:25 -0400 Michael Blumenkrantz
wrote:
> the exploratory email for my new potential project: some sort of evas
> effects library
>
> such a library would basically be evas (NOT elm) bound to ecore
> animators in various ways, providing a simple api to do something like
>
Thanks in SVN!
http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/changeset/69691
Daniel Juyung Seo (SeoZ)
On Wed, Mar 28, 2012 at 3:06 PM, chanwook jung wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I added one line to fix the bug at tree effect. If the item is equal to
> expanded_next_item, expanded_next_item set to NULL in _item_del
47 matches
Mail list logo
