in. rev 65950
thank you.
-Regards, Hermet-
-Original Message-
From: PRINCE KUMAR DUBEYlt;prince.du...@samsung.comgt;
To:
enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.netlt;enlightenment-devel@lists.sourceforge.netgt;
Cc:
Sent: 11-12-05(월) 22:14:12
Does it need to use layout? how about box?
and Don't please mix your changes in one patch.
-Regards, Hermet-
-Original Message-
From: PRINCE KUMAR DUBEYlt;prince.du...@samsung.comgt;
To:
On Fri, 04 Nov 2011 06:26:10 + (GMT) SHILPAONKAR SINGH
shilpa.si...@samsung.com said:
in general i think the idea is sound. the devil will be in the details of
implementation.
Hi All,
There is a plan to make elm_viewedit widget.
The concept of this widget is shifting between light
On 06/12/11 10:55, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
in general i think the idea is sound. the devil will be in the details of
implementation.
My biggest worry, is that it can easily cause redundancy.
Many things will have to be implemented again and kept in sync.
--
Tom.
On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 13:05:19 + (GMT) PRINCE KUMAR DUBEY
prince.du...@samsung.com said:
thanks muchly in svn! :)
Hi,
On behalf of Rajeev Ranjan, I am submitting the elm_slideshow patch which add
support for getting notification when transition completes. Change Log:
new signal
On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 13:06:27 + (GMT) PRINCE KUMAR DUBEY
prince.du...@samsung.com said:
Hi,
Attachment to the mail is elm_conform patch.
Change Log:
1. Focus chain issue fix by inserting elm_layout in hierarchy .
i think this is a bit of a hack... i don't like this. so reject because
On Tue, 06 Dec 2011 11:04:11 +0200 Tom Hacohen
tom.haco...@partner.samsung.com said:
On 06/12/11 10:55, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
in general i think the idea is sound. the devil will be in the details of
implementation.
My biggest worry, is that it can easily cause
On Tue, 06 Dec 2011 18:31:48 +0900 ChunEon Parkher...@naver.com said:
i'd say - don't use anything. elm_conformant should be doing this by itself just
like layout, box, frame etc. manage it too.
Then use a box. Box does not need more style and simple to use.
Thank you.
Hi all,
I just took the time to list all the build option and the runtime
option I know inside EFL. You will find them listed here:
http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/wiki/Compilation for the build option
and here : http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/wiki/Environment for the
runtime option. As this
On 06/12/11 15:19, Cedric BAIL wrote:
Hi all,
I just took the time to list all the build option and the runtime
option I know inside EFL. You will find them listed here:
http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/wiki/Compilation for the build option
and here :
May be I didn't explain the problem properly.
The issue is:
focus is not traversing from parent window through conformant to its content or
vice versa.
Since, conformant is an edje object, focus chain breaks here.
For that, I added elm_layout widget so, in widget hierarchy focus can traverse
On Tue, 6 Dec 2011 18:49:22 +0900
Daniel Juyung Seo seojuyu...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah I remember we concluded to put the docs in header file.
The vote was like 50/50.
Daniel Juyung Seo (SeoZ)
On Dec 6, 2011 3:02 PM, Carsten Haitzler ras...@rasterman.com wrote:
On Tue, 6 Dec 2011 00:57:41
Dear Myungjae,
I'm sorry for my overly late response. I was swamped with other stuff
recently and only now got to this.
After the intro, time to get to business: :P
On 25/11/11 02:17, 이명재 wrote:
After applying the previous changeset 64721, the cursor geometry is wrong
in a char-wrapped or a
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Enlightenment SVN
no-re...@enlightenment.org wrote:
Log:
eina: fix system header usage.
Author: cedric
Date: 2011-12-06 08:57:28 -0800 (Tue, 06 Dec 2011)
New Revision: 65969
Trac: http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/changeset/65969
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 6:19 PM, Vincent Torri vincent.to...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 5:57 PM, Enlightenment SVN
no-re...@enlightenment.org wrote:
Log:
eina: fix system header usage.
Author: cedric
Date: 2011-12-06 08:57:28 -0800 (Tue, 06 Dec 2011)
New
This is cool!!
Please update ElementaryChanges wiki page for elementary API or
whatever changes.
http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/wiki/ElementaryChanges
I just saw the elm_index code and there are a lot to be fixed in elm_index :(
This will be done soon :)
Thanks.
Daniel Juyung Soe (SeoZ)
On
On Tue, 06 Dec 2011 15:57:15 +0200 Tom Hacohen
tom.haco...@partner.samsung.com said:
On 06/12/11 15:19, Cedric BAIL wrote:
Hi all,
I just took the time to list all the build option and the runtime
option I know inside EFL. You will find them listed here:
On Tue, 6 Dec 2011 14:19:01 +0100 Cedric BAIL cedric.b...@free.fr said:
Hi all,
I just took the time to list all the build option and the runtime
option I know inside EFL. You will find them listed here:
http://trac.enlightenment.org/e/wiki/Compilation for the build option
and here :
On Tue, 06 Dec 2011 14:48:16 + (GMT) PRINCE KUMAR DUBEY
prince.du...@samsung.com said:
May be I didn't explain the problem properly.
The issue is:
focus is not traversing from parent window through conformant to its content
or vice versa. Since, conformant is an edje object, focus chain
On Tue, 6 Dec 2011 09:49:27 -0500 Michael Blumenkrantz
michael.blumenkra...@gmail.com said:
On Tue, 6 Dec 2011 18:49:22 +0900
Daniel Juyung Seo seojuyu...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah I remember we concluded to put the docs in header file.
The vote was like 50/50.
Daniel Juyung Seo (SeoZ)
SOUNDS AWESOME!
But I can't test it :( I got segv when I ran 'exactness -r'
Anyhow, this is so nice and every widget developer have to use it and
test with it.
Thanks.
Daniel Juyung Seo (SeoZ)
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 1:05 AM, Enlightenment SVN
no-re...@enlightenment.org wrote:
Log:
Exactness:
Hello ~ Prince.
With current elm_conformant's codes, focus tree doesn't have any problem
because,
every content, which is set by elm_conformant_content_set_func, will be a
sub-object of elm_conformant.
(you can check elm_widget_sub_object_add in _content_set_hook function)
I cannot
Dear, Tom, Raster and EFL people.
Now I'm trying to reduce the code diffs between EFL svn and my company's
local git repository.
I'm sending you entry-related patches continuously those are specialized in
mobile environment such as selection handlers and magnifier.
First, I attached edje entry
The problem is how focus will pass from parent through conformant (an edje
object) to its children and vice-versa.
Thanks.
--- Original Message ---
Sender : ???woo_hyun0...@naver.com
Date : Dec 07, 2011 07:41 (GMT+05:30)
Title : RE: Re: [E-devel] [Patch] elm_conform patch
Hello ~ Prince.
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 4:52 AM, Myungjae Lee sac...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear, Tom, Raster and EFL people.
Now I'm trying to reduce the code diffs between EFL svn and my company's
local git repository.
I'm sending you entry-related patches continuously those are specialized in
mobile
As the author of illume stuff, this is a hack. I agree. Fix it proper,
or don't fix it. As always, patches are welcome...but improper patches
do get rejected. Using 'layout' to Avoid the problem is no solution.
dh
On 12/06/11 19:00, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Tue, 06 Dec
Ahmen, but are they not included already via 'private' headers ? I'm
finding that (in the EFL) most needed headers are pretty much already
there.
dh
On 12/06/11 19:49, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
Log:
let's not fail to include standard headers when we need things like..
ooh.. malloc?
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 8:21 AM, Vincent Torri vincent.to...@gmail.comwrote:
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 4:52 AM, Myungjae Lee sac...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear, Tom, Raster and EFL people.
Please review this patch and apply it if it's acceptable.
Or if you have any opinion for this feel free to
On 12/06/11 20:10, Enlightenment SVN wrote:
Log:
NO! you break api. you made my e sit here with a segv in a getenv.
because now many libraries and api's don't have prototyopes for
malloc/calloc and much more and this goes horribly wrong especially on
64bit! the eina headers have
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 8:26 AM, Vincent Torri vincent.to...@gmail.comwrote:
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 8:21 AM, Vincent Torri vincent.to...@gmail.comwrote:
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 4:52 AM, Myungjae Lee sac...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear, Tom, Raster and EFL people.
Please review this patch and
30 matches
Mail list logo
