Re: [E-devel] [EGIT] [core/efl] master 02/02: ecore: force initialization of Efl.Io.Closer.Fd.

2017-09-26 Thread Cedric Bail
> Original Message > Subject: Re: [E-devel] [EGIT] [core/efl] master 02/02: ecore: force > initialization of Efl.Io.Closer.Fd. > Local Time: September 25, 2017 8:01 PM > UTC Time: September 26, 2017 3:01 AM > From: j...@videolan.org > To: Enlightenment dev

Re: [E-devel] [EGIT] [core/efl] master 02/02: ecore: force initialization of Efl.Io.Closer.Fd.

2017-09-25 Thread Jean-Philippe André
ssage ---- > >> Subject: Re: [E-devel] [EGIT] [core/efl] master 02/02: ecore: force > initialization of Efl.Io.Closer.Fd. > >> Local Time: September 23, 2017 11:39 AM > >> UTC Time: September 23, 2017 6:39 PM > >> From: barbi...@gmail.com > >> To:

Re: [E-devel] [EGIT] [core/efl] master 02/02: ecore: force initialization of Efl.Io.Closer.Fd.

2017-09-25 Thread Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
then we should have an equivalent of a constructor for a mixin? as you said, eventually "initialize to 0" is not good enough On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 7:11 PM, Cedric Bail wrote: >> Original Message >> Subject: Re: [E-devel] [EGIT] [core/efl] mast

Re: [E-devel] [EGIT] [core/efl] master 02/02: ecore: force initialization of Efl.Io.Closer.Fd.

2017-09-25 Thread Cedric Bail
> Original Message > Subject: Re: [E-devel] [EGIT] [core/efl] master 02/02: ecore: force > initialization of Efl.Io.Closer.Fd. > Local Time: September 23, 2017 11:39 AM > UTC Time: September 23, 2017 6:39 PM > From: barbi...@gmail.com > To: Enlightenment dev

Re: [E-devel] [EGIT] [core/efl] master 02/02: ecore: force initialization of Efl.Io.Closer.Fd.

2017-09-23 Thread Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
This is not right. You can use only -1 and you can use the constructor. Em sex, 22 de set de 2017 às 18:58, Cedric BAIL escreveu: > cedric pushed a commit to branch master. > > > http://git.enlightenment.org/core/efl.git/commit/?id=17507bab43e18b3a29fb045302de6c4f88fef594 > > commit 17507bab43e1