On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 10:15 PM, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 03 Apr 2008 21:25:05 +0200 Kim Woelders [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled:
Cedric BAIL wrote:
So here are some patch that should not break edje too much.
0001 and 0002: Replace call to
On Fri, 4 Apr 2008, Cedric BAIL wrote:
I believe only 0004 should be risky, the other shouldn't be risky. But
as it break illumine. I should try it. Do you have a tarball, an url
or something for this stuff ?
http://illume.projects.openmoko.org/
Vincent
Hi,
So here are some patch that should not break edje too much.
0001 and 0002: Replace call to snprintf by using memcpy or some kind of itoa.
0003: edje_match can work without the need to call memset.
0004: When edje hide an object, their is no need to move/resize it and
mark it as changed
Cedric BAIL wrote:
Hi,
So here are some patch that should not break edje too much.
0001 and 0002: Replace call to snprintf by using memcpy or some kind of itoa.
Is this really worth while? Possibly a small speedup at the cost of
considerably more and considerably uglier code?
/Kim
On Thu, 03 Apr 2008 21:25:05 +0200 Kim Woelders [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled:
Cedric BAIL wrote:
Hi,
So here are some patch that should not break edje too much.
0001 and 0002: Replace call to snprintf by using memcpy or some kind of
itoa.
Is this really worth while? Possibly a
