to make clear: it COULD be -0, on intel at least it's -1 and thus
evaluates to TRUE, that's why it was unnoticed.
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 5:56 PM, Enlightenment CVS
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Enlightenment CVS committal
Author : barbieri
Project : e17
Module : libs/evas
Dir :
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
to make clear: it COULD be -0, on intel at least it's -1 and thus
evaluates to TRUE, that's why it was unnoticed.
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 5:56 PM, Enlightenment CVS
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Enlightenment CVS committal
Author : barbieri
Project : e17
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 6:46 PM, Kim Woelders [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
to make clear: it COULD be -0, on intel at least it's -1 and thus
evaluates to TRUE, that's why it was unnoticed.
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 5:56 PM, Enlightenment CVS
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Tue, 20 May 2008 18:27:32 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
[EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled:
then u'd have a platform that does NOT do 2's compliment math. not compiler but
cpu... and i'd love to see that exist - NOT. :) everything is 2's compliment
and so a 1 bit signed bitfield when on is -1 which as
On Tue, May 20, 2008 at 8:18 PM, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 20 May 2008 18:27:32 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
[EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled:
then u'd have a platform that does NOT do 2's compliment math. not compiler
but
cpu... and i'd love to see that
On Feb 8, 2008 4:55 PM, Enlightenment CVS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Enlightenment CVS committal
Log Message:
Add const: evas_hash.c
As agreed on IRC, evas_hash_foreach() now takes const, to make clear
that hash shouldn't be changed. If one wants to change he must do a
cast and return 0.
Guys, could you please test it? You can run your applications within
Xephyr -screen WxHx16.
On 10/10/07, Enlightenment CVS [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Enlightenment CVS committal
Author : barbieri
Project : e17
Module : libs/evas
Dir : e17/libs/evas/src/modules/engines/software_16
On Wed, 10 Oct 2007, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
Guys, could you please test it? You can run your applications within
Xephyr -screen WxHx16.
I can test on windows :)
Vincent
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by:
Spotted a segv in the software_16 engine related to building the image
cache. I have an EWL engine setup to use software_16_x11, but EWL does
some aggressive evas object caching. In order to be certain edje
properties get reset, we set the file and key on the edje object to
NULL. As you can see in
On 6/27/07, Nathan Ingersoll [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Spotted a segv in the software_16 engine related to building the image
cache. I have an EWL engine setup to use software_16_x11, but EWL does
some aggressive evas object caching. In order to be certain edje
properties get reset, we set the
On 6/27/07, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for spotting that, I'll fix ASAP (I'm in a hotel right now).
No problem. I put in a fix that prevents the segv, it's just a two
liner so hopefully it doesn't conflict with any outstanding changes
you have.
11 matches
Mail list logo
