On Monday 05 August 2013 18:23, Felipe Magno de Almeida wrote :
Hello,
Hello,
Is there any reason in eo2 why the eo wrapper function (the ones
defined by EO2_FUNC_BODY et al) doesn't call the function directly,
instead of registering it with Eo2_Op_Description. Which adds an
unnecessary
On Monday 05 August 2013 12:18, Cedric BAIL wrote :
Hello,
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 11:33 PM, Jérémy Zurcher jer...@asynk.ch wrote:
On Friday 02 August 2013 03:42, Cedric BAIL wrote :
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Jérémy Zurcher jer...@asynk.ch wrote:
these where my numbers
On 04/08/13 08:20, daniel.za...@samsung.com wrote:
Hi Jeremy,
On 08/02/2013 05:33 PM, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
On Friday 02 August 2013 03:42, Cedric BAIL wrote :
Hello,
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Jérémy Zurcher jer...@asynk.ch wrote:
what is the purpose of these hooks again,
Improving
On 05/08/13 06:48, daniel.za...@samsung.com wrote:
Hi Jeremy
On 08/05/2013 02:12 AM, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
On Sunday 04 August 2013 10:20, daniel.za...@samsung.com wrote :
Hi Jeremy,
Hello Daniel
On 08/02/2013 05:33 PM, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
On Friday 02 August 2013 03:42, Cedric BAIL
On 02/08/13 02:42, Cedric BAIL wrote:
Hello,
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Jérémy Zurcher jer...@asynk.ch wrote:
what is the purpose of these hooks again,
Improving our tooling. Right now there is at least a few tools that
can use them :
- espion, that does trace every call to elementary
Hello,
Is there any reason in eo2 why the eo wrapper function (the ones
defined by EO2_FUNC_BODY et al) doesn't call the function directly,
instead of registering it with Eo2_Op_Description. Which adds an
unnecessary indirection.
Also, I've been experimenting with changing Eo to make the class
Hi Jeremy,
On 08/02/2013 05:33 PM, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
On Friday 02 August 2013 03:42, Cedric BAIL wrote :
Hello,
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Jérémy Zurcher jer...@asynk.ch wrote:
what is the purpose of these hooks again,
Improving our tooling. Right now there is at least a few tools
Hello,
On Fri, Aug 2, 2013 at 11:33 PM, Jérémy Zurcher jer...@asynk.ch wrote:
On Friday 02 August 2013 03:42, Cedric BAIL wrote :
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Jérémy Zurcher jer...@asynk.ch wrote:
these where my numbers beforeand now
simple inc() - 9 calls
Hi Jeremy
On 08/05/2013 02:12 AM, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
On Sunday 04 August 2013 10:20, daniel.za...@samsung.com wrote :
Hi Jeremy,
Hello Daniel
On 08/02/2013 05:33 PM, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
On Friday 02 August 2013 03:42, Cedric BAIL wrote :
Hello,
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 2:03 PM,
On Friday 02 August 2013 03:42, Cedric BAIL wrote :
Hello,
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Jérémy Zurcher jer...@asynk.ch wrote:
what is the purpose of these hooks again,
Improving our tooling. Right now there is at least a few tools that
can use them :
- espion, that does trace every
Hi Cédric,
what is the purpose of these hooks again,
these where my numbers beforeand now
simple inc() - 9 calls
calls/eo_do() EO [ns]/call - EO2 [ns]/call - EO2 [ns]/call
#1 20 2529
#3 11 15
Hello,
On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 2:03 PM, Jérémy Zurcher jer...@asynk.ch wrote:
what is the purpose of these hooks again,
Improving our tooling. Right now there is at least a few tools that
can use them :
- espion, that does trace every call to elementary and efl to rebuild
a fake application
On Saturday 27 July 2013 21:02, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote :
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Jérémy Zurcher jer...@asynk.ch wrote:
On Saturday 27 July 2013 11:10, Carsten Haitzler wrote :
On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 14:57:28 -0300 Lucas De Marchi
lucas.demar...@profusion.mobi said:
On
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Jérémy Zurcher jer...@asynk.ch wrote:
On Saturday 27 July 2013 11:10, Carsten Haitzler wrote :
On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 14:57:28 -0300 Lucas De Marchi
lucas.demar...@profusion.mobi said:
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 8:54 PM, Carsten Haitzler ras...@rasterman.com
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 11:47 PM, Carsten Haitzler ras...@rasterman.com wrote:
On Sat, 27 Jul 2013 22:54:07 +0200 Jérémy Zurcher jer...@asynk.ch said:
On Saturday 27 July 2013 11:10, Carsten Haitzler wrote :
On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 14:57:28 -0300 Lucas De Marchi
lucas.demar...@profusion.mobi
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Lucas De Marchi
lucas.demar...@profusion.mobi wrote:
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Jérémy Zurcher jer...@asynk.ch wrote:
On Saturday 27 July 2013 11:10, Carsten Haitzler wrote :
On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 14:57:28 -0300 Lucas De Marchi
On 27/07/13 03:10, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 14:57:28 -0300 Lucas De Marchi
lucas.demar...@profusion.mobi said:
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 8:54 PM, Carsten Haitzler ras...@rasterman.com
wrote:
On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 14:58:30 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
barbi...@profusion.mobi wrote:
[snip]
the con I could see is we loose validation in the caller, you'd need
to validate in the function... Example:
eo_do(evas_obj, ecore_timer_interval_set(10.0));
this would still call directly
On 29/07/13 14:49, Felipe Magno de Almeida wrote:
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
barbi...@profusion.mobi wrote:
[snip]
the con I could see is we loose validation in the caller, you'd need
to validate in the function... Example:
eo_do(evas_obj,
On Monday 29 July 2013 10:31, Lucas De Marchi wrote :
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Jérémy Zurcher jer...@asynk.ch wrote:
On Saturday 27 July 2013 11:10, Carsten Haitzler wrote :
On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 14:57:28 -0300 Lucas De Marchi
lucas.demar...@profusion.mobi said:
On Thu, Jul 25,
On 29/07/13 16:04, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
On Monday 29 July 2013 10:31, Lucas De Marchi wrote :
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Jérémy Zurcher jer...@asynk.ch wrote:
On Saturday 27 July 2013 11:10, Carsten Haitzler wrote :
On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 14:57:28 -0300 Lucas De Marchi
On Monday 29 July 2013 16:03, Tom Hacohen wrote :
On 29/07/13 16:04, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
On Monday 29 July 2013 10:31, Lucas De Marchi wrote :
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Jérémy Zurcher jer...@asynk.ch wrote:
On Saturday 27 July 2013 11:10, Carsten Haitzler wrote :
On Fri, 26
On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 12:04 PM, Jérémy Zurcher jer...@asynk.ch wrote:
On Monday 29 July 2013 10:31, Lucas De Marchi wrote :
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Jérémy Zurcher jer...@asynk.ch wrote:
On Saturday 27 July 2013 11:10, Carsten Haitzler wrote :
On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 14:57:28 -0300
On Saturday 27 July 2013 11:10, Carsten Haitzler wrote :
On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 14:57:28 -0300 Lucas De Marchi
lucas.demar...@profusion.mobi said:
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 8:54 PM, Carsten Haitzler ras...@rasterman.com
wrote:
On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 14:58:30 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
On Sat, Jul 27, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Jérémy Zurcher jer...@asynk.ch wrote:
On Saturday 27 July 2013 11:10, Carsten Haitzler wrote :
On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 14:57:28 -0300 Lucas De Marchi
lucas.demar...@profusion.mobi said:
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 8:54 PM, Carsten Haitzler ras...@rasterman.com
On Sat, 27 Jul 2013 22:54:07 +0200 Jérémy Zurcher jer...@asynk.ch said:
On Saturday 27 July 2013 11:10, Carsten Haitzler wrote :
On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 14:57:28 -0300 Lucas De Marchi
lucas.demar...@profusion.mobi said:
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 8:54 PM, Carsten Haitzler
On 25/07/13 18:58, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri wrote:
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Tom Hacohen tom.haco...@samsung.com wrote:
On 24/07/13 03:09, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Tue, 23 Jul 2013 18:22:02 +0200 Jérémy Zurcher jer...@asynk.ch said:
just to clarify a few points:
- I
Hi,
Le 26.07.2013 01:54, Carsten Haitzler a écrit :
On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 14:58:30 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
barbi...@profusion.mobi said:
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Tom Hacohen tom.haco...@samsung.com
wrote:
On 24/07/13 03:09, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Tue,
On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 11:26:47 +0200 Raoul Hecky raoul.he...@gmail.com said:
Hi,
Le 26.07.2013 01:54, Carsten Haitzler a écrit :
On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 14:58:30 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
barbi...@profusion.mobi said:
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Tom Hacohen
On 26/07/13 11:23, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 11:26:47 +0200 Raoul Hecky raoul.he...@gmail.com said:
Hi,
Le 26.07.2013 01:54, Carsten Haitzler a écrit :
On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 14:58:30 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
barbi...@profusion.mobi said:
On Thu, Jul
On 23/07/13 16:05, Tom Hacohen wrote:
code
do {
__VA_ARGS__ // (like we do now)
} while (0);
if (0)
bla(__VA_ARGS__) // this will do the checking for us.
/code
Actually, this wouldn't work. :( The problem is, some of the functions
in __VA_ARGS__ may return void, which will break
On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 12:57:24 +0100 Tom Hacohen tom.haco...@samsung.com said:
On 26/07/13 11:23, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 11:26:47 +0200 Raoul Hecky raoul.he...@gmail.com said:
Hi,
Le 26.07.2013 01:54, Carsten Haitzler a écrit :
On Thu, 25 Jul 2013
On 26/07/13 15:33, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 12:57:24 +0100 Tom Hacohen tom.haco...@samsung.com said:
On 26/07/13 11:23, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 11:26:47 +0200 Raoul Hecky raoul.he...@gmail.com said:
Hi,
Le 26.07.2013
On 26/07/13 15:33, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 12:57:24 +0100 Tom Hacohen tom.haco...@samsung.com said:
On 26/07/13 11:23, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 11:26:47 +0200 Raoul Hecky raoul.he...@gmail.com said:
Hi,
Le 26.07.2013
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 8:54 PM, Carsten Haitzler ras...@rasterman.com wrote:
On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 14:58:30 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
barbi...@profusion.mobi said:
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Tom Hacohen tom.haco...@samsung.com wrote:
On 24/07/13 03:09, Carsten Haitzler (The
On Fri, 26 Jul 2013 14:57:28 -0300 Lucas De Marchi
lucas.demar...@profusion.mobi said:
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 8:54 PM, Carsten Haitzler ras...@rasterman.com
wrote:
On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 14:58:30 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
barbi...@profusion.mobi said:
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 1:46 PM,
On 23/07/13 17:04, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
On Tuesday 23 July 2013 15:47, Tom Hacohen wrote :
On 12/07/13 07:42, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Mon, 08 Jul 2013 18:00:15 +0100 Tom Hacohen tom.haco...@samsung.com
said:
ok. looked at eo2test.c
eo2_do(obj,
a =
On 24/07/13 03:09, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Tue, 23 Jul 2013 18:22:02 +0200 Jérémy Zurcher jer...@asynk.ch said:
just to clarify a few points:
- I think the less macro we have in an eo class declaration the best,
actually we have nothing but that extra first parameter
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Tom Hacohen tom.haco...@samsung.com wrote:
On 24/07/13 03:09, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Tue, 23 Jul 2013 18:22:02 +0200 Jérémy Zurcher jer...@asynk.ch said:
just to clarify a few points:
- I think the less macro we have in an eo class
On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 14:58:30 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
barbi...@profusion.mobi said:
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Tom Hacohen tom.haco...@samsung.com wrote:
On 24/07/13 03:09, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Tue, 23 Jul 2013 18:22:02 +0200 Jérémy Zurcher jer...@asynk.ch
Occurs to me Go language calls this deferred, in it we could defer a call to
be called at every exit point.
Maybe there is an defer extension to compilers providing deferred calls in c?
--Gustavo
Sent from my iPhone
On 25/07/2013, at 20:54, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 8:54 AM, Carsten Haitzler ras...@rasterman.com wrote:
On Thu, 25 Jul 2013 14:58:30 -0300 Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
barbi...@profusion.mobi said:
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 1:46 PM, Tom Hacohen tom.haco...@samsung.com wrote:
On 24/07/13 03:09, Carsten Haitzler (The
On 12/07/13 07:42, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Mon, 08 Jul 2013 18:00:15 +0100 Tom Hacohen tom.haco...@samsung.com said:
ok. looked at eo2test.c
eo2_do(obj,
a = inst_func(eo_o, 32);
inst_func(eo_o, 10);
b = inst_func(eo_o, 50);
);
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 11:47 AM, Tom Hacohen tom.haco...@samsung.com wrote:
On 12/07/13 07:42, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Mon, 08 Jul 2013 18:00:15 +0100 Tom Hacohen tom.haco...@samsung.com
said:
ok. looked at eo2test.c
eo2_do(obj,
a = inst_func(eo_o, 32);
On 23/07/13 02:51, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Mon, 22 Jul 2013 17:30:17 +0100 Tom Hacohen tom.haco...@samsung.com said:
On 21/07/13 14:18, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
Hello from my holiday in France (for the frenchies who know lofofora ;)
On Friday 12 July 2013 15:42, Carsten
On Tuesday 23 July 2013 15:47, Tom Hacohen wrote :
On 12/07/13 07:42, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Mon, 08 Jul 2013 18:00:15 +0100 Tom Hacohen tom.haco...@samsung.com
said:
ok. looked at eo2test.c
eo2_do(obj,
a = inst_func(eo_o, 32);
just to clarify a few points:
- I think the less macro we have in an eo class declaration the best,
actually we have nothing but that extra first parameter called eo2_o, wich
is either an obj_ptr (devs/tasn/eo2) or a call_ctx (devs/jeyzu/eo2)
this should go away if we use a stack per
On Tue, 23 Jul 2013 18:22:02 +0200 Jérémy Zurcher jer...@asynk.ch said:
just to clarify a few points:
- I think the less macro we have in an eo class declaration the best,
actually we have nothing but that extra first parameter called eo2_o, wich
is either an obj_ptr (devs/tasn/eo2) or
On 18/07/13 03:00, Cedric BAIL wrote:
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Carsten Haitzler ras...@rasterman.com
wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 15:10:45 +0100 Tom Hacohen tom.haco...@samsung.com
said:
On 17/07/13 15:04, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
On 07/17/2013 02:07 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
On 16/07/13
On 21/07/13 14:18, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
Hello from my holiday in France (for the frenchies who know lofofora ;)
On Friday 12 July 2013 15:42, Carsten Haitzler wrote :
On Mon, 08 Jul 2013 18:00:15 +0100 Tom Hacohen tom.haco...@samsung.com
said:
ok. looked at eo2test.c
eo2_do(obj,
On Mon, 22 Jul 2013 17:30:17 +0100 Tom Hacohen tom.haco...@samsung.com said:
On 21/07/13 14:18, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
Hello from my holiday in France (for the frenchies who know lofofora ;)
On Friday 12 July 2013 15:42, Carsten Haitzler wrote :
On Mon, 08 Jul 2013 18:00:15 +0100 Tom
Hello from my holiday in France (for the frenchies who know lofofora ;)
On Friday 12 July 2013 15:42, Carsten Haitzler wrote :
On Mon, 08 Jul 2013 18:00:15 +0100 Tom Hacohen tom.haco...@samsung.com said:
ok. looked at eo2test.c
eo2_do(obj,
a = inst_func(eo_o, 32);
On Sun, 21 Jul 2013 15:18:02 +0200 Jérémy Zurcher jer...@asynk.ch said:
Hello from my holiday in France (for the frenchies who know lofofora ;)
On Friday 12 July 2013 15:42, Carsten Haitzler wrote :
On Mon, 08 Jul 2013 18:00:15 +0100 Tom Hacohen tom.haco...@samsung.com
said:
ok.
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 8:55 AM, Carsten Haitzler ras...@rasterman.com wrote:
On Sun, 21 Jul 2013 15:18:02 +0200 Jérémy Zurcher jer...@asynk.ch said:
Hello from my holiday in France (for the frenchies who know lofofora ;)
Enjoy !
On Friday 12 July 2013 15:42, Carsten Haitzler wrote :
On
On Mon, 22 Jul 2013 10:24:03 +0900 Cedric BAIL cedric.b...@free.fr said:
On Mon, Jul 22, 2013 at 8:55 AM, Carsten Haitzler ras...@rasterman.com
wrote:
On Sun, 21 Jul 2013 15:18:02 +0200 Jérémy Zurcher jer...@asynk.ch said:
Hello from my holiday in France (for the frenchies who know lofofora
On 16/07/13 09:02, Cedric BAIL wrote:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Stefan Schmidt s.schm...@samsung.com wrote:
On 07/16/2013 12:58 AM, Cedric BAIL wrote:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 12:35 AM, Tom Hacohen tom.haco...@samsung.com
wrote:
On 09/07/13 04:09, Cedric BAIL wrote:
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013
Hello.
On 07/17/2013 02:07 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
On 16/07/13 09:02, Cedric BAIL wrote:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Stefan Schmidt s.schm...@samsung.com
wrote:
Before the efl merge and the git move Daniel and myself played around
with what we already had in svn and made it work again.
On 17/07/13 15:04, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
Hello.
On 07/17/2013 02:07 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
On 16/07/13 09:02, Cedric BAIL wrote:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Stefan Schmidt s.schm...@samsung.com
wrote:
Before the efl merge and the git move Daniel and myself played around
with what we
On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 15:10:45 +0100 Tom Hacohen tom.haco...@samsung.com said:
On 17/07/13 15:04, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
Hello.
On 07/17/2013 02:07 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
On 16/07/13 09:02, Cedric BAIL wrote:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Stefan Schmidt s.schm...@samsung.com
wrote:
On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Carsten Haitzler ras...@rasterman.com wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jul 2013 15:10:45 +0100 Tom Hacohen tom.haco...@samsung.com said:
On 17/07/13 15:04, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
On 07/17/2013 02:07 PM, Tom Hacohen wrote:
On 16/07/13 09:02, Cedric BAIL wrote:
On Tue, Jul
Hello.
On 07/16/2013 12:58 AM, Cedric BAIL wrote:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 12:35 AM, Tom Hacohen tom.haco...@samsung.com
wrote:
On 09/07/13 04:09, Cedric BAIL wrote:
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 2:00 AM, Tom Hacohen tom.haco...@samsung.com
Eo is one of the biggest change we did for 1.8. At this
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 4:35 PM, Stefan Schmidt s.schm...@samsung.com wrote:
On 07/16/2013 12:58 AM, Cedric BAIL wrote:
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 12:35 AM, Tom Hacohen tom.haco...@samsung.com
wrote:
On 09/07/13 04:09, Cedric BAIL wrote:
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 2:00 AM, Tom Hacohen
On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 09:07:14 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman)
ras...@rasterman.com wrote:
On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 08:58:15 +0900 Cedric BAIL cedric.b...@free.fr
said:
Hello,
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 12:35 AM, Tom Hacohen
tom.haco...@samsung.com wrote:
On 09/07/13 04:09, Cedric
On 10/07/13 11:00, Cedric BAIL wrote:
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 6:02 PM, Jérémy Zurcher jer...@asynk.ch wrote:
On Wednesday 10 July 2013 16:41, Cedric BAIL wrote :
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 11:08 PM, Jérémy Zurcher jer...@asynk.ch wrote:
On Tuesday 09 July 2013 13:40, Tom Hacohen wrote :
On
On 09/07/13 04:09, Cedric BAIL wrote:
Hello,
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 2:00 AM, Tom Hacohen tom.haco...@samsung.com wrote:
The hero Jeremy Zurcher has been playing around and looking for ways to
improve Eo and address all the issues that have been raised by everyone.
We revisited some old
Hello,
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 12:35 AM, Tom Hacohen tom.haco...@samsung.com wrote:
On 09/07/13 04:09, Cedric BAIL wrote:
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 2:00 AM, Tom Hacohen tom.haco...@samsung.com wrote:
The hero Jeremy Zurcher has been playing around and looking for ways to
improve Eo and address
On Tue, 16 Jul 2013 08:58:15 +0900 Cedric BAIL cedric.b...@free.fr said:
Hello,
On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 12:35 AM, Tom Hacohen tom.haco...@samsung.com wrote:
On 09/07/13 04:09, Cedric BAIL wrote:
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 2:00 AM, Tom Hacohen tom.haco...@samsung.com
...
That lead to an
On Mon, 08 Jul 2013 18:00:15 +0100 Tom Hacohen tom.haco...@samsung.com said:
ok. looked at eo2test.c
eo2_do(obj,
a = inst_func(eo_o, 32);
inst_func(eo_o, 10);
b = inst_func(eo_o, 50);
);
first... passing in eo_o... should probably go away. ie
On Thursday 11 July 2013 03:28, Cedric BAIL wrote :
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Jérémy Zurcher jer...@asynk.ch wrote:
still not fully functional,
here is the concept:
- enhance const Eo_Op_Description *descs; in Eo_Class_Description into:
typedef struct _Eo_Op_Description
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 5:36 PM, Jérémy Zurcher jer...@asynk.ch wrote:
On Thursday 11 July 2013 03:28, Cedric BAIL wrote :
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Jérémy Zurcher jer...@asynk.ch wrote:
still not fully functional,
here is the concept:
- enhance const Eo_Op_Description
On Thursday 11 July 2013 19:11, Cedric BAIL wrote :
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 5:36 PM, Jérémy Zurcher jer...@asynk.ch wrote:
On Thursday 11 July 2013 03:28, Cedric BAIL wrote :
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 4:06 PM, Jérémy Zurcher jer...@asynk.ch wrote:
still not fully functional,
here is
Hello,
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 7:41 PM, Jérémy Zurcher jer...@asynk.ch wrote:
On Thursday 11 July 2013 19:11, Cedric BAIL wrote :
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 5:36 PM, Jérémy Zurcher jer...@asynk.ch wrote:
On Thursday 11 July 2013 03:28, Cedric BAIL wrote :
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 4:06 PM,
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 11:08 PM, Jérémy Zurcher jer...@asynk.ch wrote:
On Tuesday 09 July 2013 13:40, Tom Hacohen wrote :
On 09/07/13 03:55, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Mon, 08 Jul 2013 18:00:15 +0100 Tom Hacohen tom.haco...@samsung.com
said:
Hey guys,
The hero
On Wednesday 10 July 2013 16:41, Cedric BAIL wrote :
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 11:08 PM, Jérémy Zurcher jer...@asynk.ch wrote:
On Tuesday 09 July 2013 13:40, Tom Hacohen wrote :
On 09/07/13 03:55, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Mon, 08 Jul 2013 18:00:15 +0100 Tom Hacohen
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 6:02 PM, Jérémy Zurcher jer...@asynk.ch wrote:
On Wednesday 10 July 2013 16:41, Cedric BAIL wrote :
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 11:08 PM, Jérémy Zurcher jer...@asynk.ch wrote:
On Tuesday 09 July 2013 13:40, Tom Hacohen wrote :
On 09/07/13 03:55, Carsten Haitzler (The
Hi,
could you have a look at devs/jeyzu/eo2
the last commit propose something to solve the func as OP issue,
it just needs Eo_Op_Description to be replaced with a new struct,
so for now it just calls op 0 all the time.
--- Hell'O from Yverdoom
Jérémy (jeyzu)
sorry the thread is broken, I forgot to synk the mailbox when leaving
the office, btw here are my numbers from afdb8f3
gcc (GCC) 4.8.1
Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Duo CPU E7500 @2.93GHz
64 bits
with -g -ggdb3 -O3
Signal/Basic Tests: OK
Signal/CollectorVector: OK
Signal/CollectorUntil0: OK
On Tuesday 09 July 2013 12:09, Cedric BAIL wrote :
Hello,
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 2:00 AM, Tom Hacohen tom.haco...@samsung.com wrote:
The hero Jeremy Zurcher has been playing around and looking for ways to
improve Eo and address all the issues that have been raised by everyone.
We
On 09/07/13 03:55, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Mon, 08 Jul 2013 18:00:15 +0100 Tom Hacohen tom.haco...@samsung.com said:
Hey guys,
The hero Jeremy Zurcher has been playing around and looking for ways to
improve Eo and address all the issues that have been raised by everyone.
On Tuesday 09 July 2013 13:40, Tom Hacohen wrote :
On 09/07/13 03:55, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Mon, 08 Jul 2013 18:00:15 +0100 Tom Hacohen tom.haco...@samsung.com
said:
Hey guys,
The hero Jeremy Zurcher has been playing around and looking for ways to
improve Eo
On 09/07/13 15:08, Jérémy Zurcher wrote:
On Tuesday 09 July 2013 13:40, Tom Hacohen wrote :
On 09/07/13 03:55, Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote:
On Mon, 08 Jul 2013 18:00:15 +0100 Tom Hacohen tom.haco...@samsung.com
said:
Hey guys,
The hero Jeremy Zurcher has been playing around
Hey guys,
The hero Jeremy Zurcher has been playing around and looking for ways to
improve Eo and address all the issues that have been raised by everyone.
We revisited some old ideas, tried some new ideas and changed our
compromises and preferences to better suit our needs (followed by the
forgot to git-daemon-export-ok?
http://git.enlightenment.org/devs/tasn/eo2.git = no repositories found
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 2:00 PM, Tom Hacohen tom.haco...@samsung.com wrote:
Hey guys,
The hero Jeremy Zurcher has been playing around and looking for ways to
improve Eo and address all the
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 4:58 PM, Gustavo Sverzut Barbieri
barbi...@profusion.mobi wrote:
forgot to git-daemon-export-ok?
http://git.enlightenment.org/devs/tasn/eo2.git = no repositories found
You can find it on the core efl repository in devs/tasn/eo2 branch.
On Mon, Jul 8, 2013 at 2:00 PM,
On Mon, 08 Jul 2013 18:00:15 +0100 Tom Hacohen tom.haco...@samsung.com said:
Hey guys,
The hero Jeremy Zurcher has been playing around and looking for ways to
improve Eo and address all the issues that have been raised by everyone.
We revisited some old ideas, tried some new ideas and
Hello,
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 2:00 AM, Tom Hacohen tom.haco...@samsung.com wrote:
The hero Jeremy Zurcher has been playing around and looking for ways to
improve Eo and address all the issues that have been raised by everyone.
We revisited some old ideas, tried some new ideas and changed our
On Mon, 08 Jul 2013 18:00:15 +0100 Tom Hacohen tom.haco...@samsung.com said:
Hey guys,
The hero Jeremy Zurcher has been playing around and looking for ways to
improve Eo and address all the issues that have been raised by everyone.
We revisited some old ideas, tried some new ideas and
87 matches
Mail list logo
