Re: [e-users] exebuf preload?

2006-02-05 Thread Andreas Volz
Am Sun, 5 Feb 2006 11:09:51 +0900 schrieb Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman): I was sure I tested it before and it failed. But now it works. Sorry for troubling you. Here is the dump file. I hope you could use it: http://brachttal.net/tmp/exebuf_dump so basically it looks like your

RE: [e-users] Re: [E-devel] Continuing... Anonymous CVS Servers - YOU CAN HELP!

2006-02-05 Thread Gorman, Mitch
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Morten Nilsen Sent: Saturday, February 04, 2006 9:44 PM To: eusers Subject: Re: [e-users] Re: [E-devel] Continuing... Anonymous CVS Servers - Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: I would say give them

Re: [e-users] exebuf preload?

2006-02-05 Thread Ben
On 2/5/06, Andreas Volz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, I'll try this next weekend if no solution was found until then. Perhaps it's an interesting information that it takes nearly the same time if I press TAB-TAB in an empty bash command and the system collects all executables. It's interesting

Re: [e-users] exebuf preload?

2006-02-05 Thread The Rasterman
On Sun, 5 Feb 2006 17:29:37 -0500 Ben [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled: On 2/5/06, Andreas Volz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Ok, I'll try this next weekend if no solution was found until then. Perhaps it's an interesting information that it takes nearly the same time if I press TAB-TAB in an empty

Re: [e-users] exebuf preload?

2006-02-05 Thread Dusik
On 05/02/06, Andreas Volz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Display all 3225 possibilities? (y or n) Are 3225 executables very much? I tested it on a Debian System with 1049 possibilities and it was _much_ faster (this system/harddisk is also much slower). So perhaps it's usefull to know the

Re: [e-users] exebuf preload?

2006-02-05 Thread The Rasterman
On Sun, 5 Feb 2006 21:19:31 -0500 Dusik [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled: On 05/02/06, Andreas Volz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Display all 3225 possibilities? (y or n) Are 3225 executables very much? I tested it on a Debian System with 1049 possibilities and it was _much_ faster (this

Re: [e-users] exebuf preload?

2006-02-05 Thread Dusik
On 05/02/06, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, 5 Feb 2006 21:19:31 -0500 Dusik [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled: My tab-tab gives me 2800 possibilities on Gentoo on a reiserfs 3 disk (it's supposed to be a fast SATA disk too). Bash completion takes under a second,

Re: [e-users] exebuf preload?

2006-02-05 Thread The Rasterman
On Sun, 5 Feb 2006 22:22:06 -0500 Dusik [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled: On 05/02/06, The Rasterman Carsten Haitzler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, 5 Feb 2006 21:19:31 -0500 Dusik [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled: My tab-tab gives me 2800 possibilities on Gentoo on a reiserfs 3 disk (it's

Re: [e-users] exebuf preload?

2006-02-05 Thread Dusik
Raster, As I understand what you're saying is all the disk IO happens after the exebuf window pops up. I'm seeing all the disk IO *before* the window pops up, after I press ALT+ESC. BTW, if most people aren't having this issue, I don't mind dropping it. It doesn't bother me *that* much. But

Re: [e-users] exebuf preload?

2006-02-05 Thread Jesse Luehrs
On Mon, 6 Feb 2006 00:38:02 -0500 Dusik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Raster, As I understand what you're saying is all the disk IO happens after the exebuf window pops up. I'm seeing all the disk IO *before* the window pops up, after I press ALT+ESC. BTW, if most people aren't having this

Re: [e-users] exebuf preload?

2006-02-05 Thread The Rasterman
On Mon, 6 Feb 2006 00:38:02 -0500 Dusik [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled: Raster, As I understand what you're saying is all the disk IO happens after the exebuf window pops up. I'm seeing all the disk IO *before* the window pops up, after I press ALT+ESC. no it happ4ens AT the time exebuf pops