Re: [e-users] Thinktux.net CVS Mirror

2006-01-30 Thread The Rasterman
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 08:44:53 -0500 Geoffrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > Daniel Kasak wrote: > > Pascal Schwarz wrote: > > > >> We got some problems with our mirror, we need to get another server. > >> > >> > > Forgive me if this is a silly suggestion, but how about having a daily > > cvs sn

Re: [e-users] Thinktux.net CVS Mirror

2006-01-30 Thread The Rasterman
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 12:45:04 + Martin Hauser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > > Hello, > > > >> where supposed to get deleted had not been. > > > > > > thats not the cvs mirror :) > > > > haha. well why not use subversion? > > > > svn is the better alternative probably, i agree. Though the p

Re: [e-users] Thinktux.net CVS Mirror

2006-01-30 Thread The Rasterman
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 07:23:50 -0500 Lucas Goss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > >> Despite the correct use of of cvs options, whole directories that > >> where supposed to get deleted had not been. > > > > thats not the cvs mirror :) > > haha. well why not use subversion? red cape. bull. beware. >

Re: [e-users] Thinktux.net CVS Mirror

2006-01-27 Thread Martin Hauser
Hi, > On 26/01/06, Andrew Spott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > the tarball will be used by DEFAULT. Using CVS will still be available, > > just not by DEFAULT. > > > > This really is a good thing. > > > > -Andrew > > Yes, it is a good thing. > Would it be possible to add a RSS-Feed to the tarba

Re: [e-users] Thinktux.net CVS Mirror

2006-01-26 Thread The Rasterman
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 22:20:24 +0100 Christian Walther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > On 26/01/06, Andrew Spott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > the tarball will be used by DEFAULT. Using CVS will still be available, > > just not by DEFAULT. > > > > This really is a good thing. > > > > -Andrew > > Y

Re: [e-users] Thinktux.net CVS Mirror

2006-01-26 Thread Andrew Spott
Personally, I would prefer to use CVS, however, i'm not above using the snapshots, especially when it would save the CVS server.-AndrewOn 1/26/06, Thomas Kuther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 10:32:27 -0800Andrew Spott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> the tarball will be used by DEFAULT

Re: [e-users] Thinktux.net CVS Mirror

2006-01-26 Thread Thomas Kuther
On Thu, 26 Jan 2006 10:32:27 -0800 Andrew Spott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > the tarball will be used by DEFAULT. Using CVS will still be > available, just not by DEFAULT. > > This really is a good thing. > > -Andrew > Ah OK. Sorry, i got you wrong then reading you want to "change the ebuilds

Re: [e-users] Thinktux.net CVS Mirror

2006-01-26 Thread Christian Walther
On 26/01/06, Andrew Spott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > the tarball will be used by DEFAULT. Using CVS will still be available, > just not by DEFAULT. > > This really is a good thing. > > -Andrew Yes, it is a good thing. Would it be possible to add a RSS-Feed to the tarball website so that everyon

Re: [e-users] Thinktux.net CVS Mirror

2006-01-26 Thread Andrew Spott
the tarball will be used by DEFAULT.  Using CVS will still be available, just not by DEFAULT.This really is a good thing.-AndrewOn 1/26/06, Thomas Kuther <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 21:35:43 -0500Curtis Napier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> >>Thanks Raster, I'll start using the tar

Re: [e-users] Thinktux.net CVS Mirror

2006-01-26 Thread Thomas Kuther
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 21:35:43 -0500 Curtis Napier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>Thanks Raster, I'll start using the tarball from now on. I'll also > >>look into changing the Gentoo ebuilds so we can get the tarball > >>used by default instead of CVS. > >> > >>/me goes off to find vapier on IRC. N

Re: [e-users] Thinktux.net CVS Mirror

2006-01-25 Thread Ildar Sagdejev
On 25/01/06, Gabriel Rossetti <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > That doesn't work for me, if I replace -* by ~x86 (since I have an x86) > emerge complains : > > Calculating dependencies \ > !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "e" have been masked. > !!! One of the following masked packages is requi

Re: [e-users] Thinktux.net CVS Mirror

2006-01-25 Thread Gabriel Rossetti
Hi, That doesn't work for me, if I replace -* by ~x86 (since I have an x86) emerge complains : Calculating dependencies \ !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy "e" have been masked. !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your request: - x11-wm/e- (masked by: -* keyw

Re: [e-users] Thinktux.net CVS Mirror

2006-01-25 Thread Curtis Napier
Andrew Spott wrote: Thanks for changing the ebuilds. They are my primary form on building E17, and I don't know enough about how to change them to be able to use the tarballs. -Andrew On 1/24/06, *Curtis Napier* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: Geoffrey wrote:

RE: [e-users] Thinktux.net CVS Mirror

2006-01-25 Thread Stéphane Joguet
25 janvier 2006 05:37 À : Curtis Napier Cc : enlightenment-users@lists.sourceforge.net Objet : Re: [e-users] Thinktux.net CVS Mirror   Thanks for changing the ebuilds.  They are my primary form on building E17, and I don't know enough about how to change them to be able to use the tar

Re: [e-users] Thinktux.net CVS Mirror

2006-01-24 Thread Andrew Spott
Thanks for changing the ebuilds.  They are my primary form on building E17, and I don't know enough about how to change them to be able to use the tarballs.-AndrewOn 1/24/06, Curtis Napier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Geoffrey wrote:> Quick note, your post went to me alone, not the list... :)>> Curt

Re: [e-users] Thinktux.net CVS Mirror

2006-01-24 Thread Curtis Napier
Geoffrey wrote: > Quick note, your post went to me alone, not the list... :) > > Curtis Napier wrote: >>If the tarball at freedesktop is known good I would much >>rather use that than taking my chances with CVS.I also use E17 as my >>primary WM on 3 machines so stability is more important to me th

Re: [e-users] Thinktux.net CVS Mirror

2006-01-24 Thread Michael Jennings
On Tuesday, 24 January 2006, at 14:54:08 (-0600), Hawkwind wrote: > svn happens to have a lot more choices and is more secure. A lot more choices for what? More secure by whose definition? > In fact, I'm personally thinking of setting up a mirror, but if I do > I'll be using svn by all means u

Re: [e-users] Thinktux.net CVS Mirror

2006-01-24 Thread Hawkwind
Not really a new solution nor a problem. I would think that if someone wants to setup a mirror and they wanted to use svn they could. svn happens to have a lot more choices and is more secure. In fact, I'm personally thinking of setting up a mirror, but if I do I'll be using svn by all means unl

Re: [e-users] Thinktux.net CVS Mirror

2006-01-24 Thread Michael Jennings
On Tuesday, 24 January 2006, at 21:42:53 (+0100), Johan Verrept wrote: > Any why not ? Because it is not a solution. It is a whole new set of problems. Michael -- Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX) http://www.kainx.org/ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> n + 1, Inc., http://www.nplus1.net/ Author, Eter

Re: [e-users] Thinktux.net CVS Mirror

2006-01-24 Thread Johan Verrept
Michael Jennings wrote: The next person to suggest subversion gets kicked in the teeth. "Temper is the one thing you can't get rid of by losing it." -- Jack Nicholson, "Anger Management" Any why not ? J. --

Re: [e-users] Thinktux.net CVS Mirror

2006-01-24 Thread Michael Jennings
On Tuesday, 24 January 2006, at 07:23:50 (-0500), Lucas Goss wrote: > haha. well why not use subversion? The next person to suggest subversion gets kicked in the teeth. Michael -- Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX) http://www.kainx.org/ <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> n + 1, Inc., http://www.nplus1.net/

Re: [e-users] Thinktux.net CVS Mirror

2006-01-24 Thread Geoffrey
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 02:13:40 -0500 Curtis Napier > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > > >> Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: >> >>> well enlightenment.freedesktop.org provides tarballs that get >>> made whevere cvs is kind of stable and workable every

Re: [e-users] Thinktux.net CVS Mirror

2006-01-24 Thread Geoffrey
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > well enlightenment.freedesktop.org provides tarballs that get made > whevere cvs is kind of stable and workable every week or 2 - but > people barely use it. somehow people are addicted to HAVING to use > cvs and get the "latest". :/ Hmm, I know how that

Re: [e-users] Thinktux.net CVS Mirror

2006-01-24 Thread Geoffrey
Daniel Kasak wrote: Pascal Schwarz wrote: We got some problems with our mirror, we need to get another server. Forgive me if this is a silly suggestion, but how about having a daily cvs snapshot tarball thing shared via p2p? This is for re-compilers only - of course developers still need a

Re: [e-users] Thinktux.net CVS Mirror

2006-01-24 Thread Geoffrey
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 18:56:02 +0100 Pascal Schwarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > > >>We got some problems with our mirror, we need to get another server. >> >>Details available here: >>http://pascal-schwarz.ch/blog/index.php/2006/01/23/e17-cvs-mirror-news

Re: [e-users] Thinktux.net CVS Mirror

2006-01-24 Thread Martin Hauser
Hello, > >> where supposed to get deleted had not been. > > > > thats not the cvs mirror :) > > haha. well why not use subversion? > svn is the better alternative probably, i agree. Though the problem here is that sourceforge is (still) using cvs and i assume that 90% of the people programming

Re: [e-users] Thinktux.net CVS Mirror

2006-01-24 Thread The Rasterman
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 02:13:40 -0500 Curtis Napier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > > > > well enlightenment.freedesktop.org provides tarballs that get made whevere > > cvs is kind of stable and workable every week or 2 - but people barely use > > it. somehow

Re: [e-users] Thinktux.net CVS Mirror

2006-01-24 Thread Lucas Goss
>> Despite the correct use of of cvs options, whole directories that >> where supposed to get deleted had not been. > > thats not the cvs mirror :) haha. well why not use subversion? >> well enlightenment.freedesktop.org provides tarballs that get made whevere cvs >> is kind of stable and workabl

Re: [e-users] Thinktux.net CVS Mirror

2006-01-24 Thread Martin Hauser
Hiho, > [...] Previous quotes deleted > 25GB! well then. now we have an idea what it "Takes" to be a cvs mirror... a > fair bit. thats a constant 3mbit/s of traffic. i assume it spikes during the > daytime in usa and europe maybe - so i imagine it might creep up to a good > 10mbit/sec around thos

Re: [e-users] Thinktux.net CVS Mirror

2006-01-24 Thread Gavin Costello
On 24-Jan-2006 03:52, Carsten Haitzler wrote: > well enlightenment.freedesktop.org provides tarballs that get made whevere cvs > is kind of stable and workable every week or 2 - but people barely use it. ---end quoted text--- Would it be possible to put the date of each package as well as the rele

Re: [e-users] Thinktux.net CVS Mirror

2006-01-23 Thread Curtis Napier
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: > > well enlightenment.freedesktop.org provides tarballs that get made whevere cvs > is kind of stable and workable every week or 2 - but people barely use it. > somehow people are addicted to HAVING to use cvs and get the "latest". :/ > Who makes that ta

Re: [e-users] Thinktux.net CVS Mirror

2006-01-23 Thread Andrew Spott
I know with me this is because I have an ebuild I can do to rebuild E.  emerge makes things really easy.also, various scripts make it easy to do, and they use cvs.  I don't believe that normally people are interested in using CVS, except when it is made so increadibly easy. My suggestion, change th

Re: [e-users] Thinktux.net CVS Mirror

2006-01-23 Thread David Seikel
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 15:52:22 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > well enlightenment.freedesktop.org provides tarballs that get made > whevere cvs is kind of stable and workable every week or 2 - but > people barely use it. somehow people are addicted to HAVING to us

Re: [e-users] Thinktux.net CVS Mirror

2006-01-23 Thread The Rasterman
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 15:34:25 +1100 Daniel Kasak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > Pascal Schwarz wrote: > > >We got some problems with our mirror, we need to get another server. > > > > > Forgive me if this is a silly suggestion, but how about having a daily > cvs snapshot tarball thing shared vi

Re: [e-users] Thinktux.net CVS Mirror

2006-01-23 Thread The Rasterman
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 06:43:48 +0100 Pascal Schwarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > > i would assume GB :) > > correct, we're talking about gigabytes > > > i assume it spikes during the > > daytime in usa and europe maybe - so i imagine it might creep up to a > > good > > 10mbit/sec around those ti

Re: [e-users] Thinktux.net CVS Mirror

2006-01-23 Thread The Rasterman
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 14:32:55 +1000 David Seikel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 12:03:32 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > i think it may be time to set up an anonymous cvs mirror network for > > e. i might consider turning sf.net anon cv

Re: [e-users] Thinktux.net CVS Mirror

2006-01-23 Thread Pascal Schwarz
> i would assume GB :) correct, we're talking about gigabytes > i assume it spikes during the > daytime in usa and europe maybe - so i imagine it might creep up to a > good > 10mbit/sec around those times at peaks? yeah there are in fact spikes depending on daytime in usa and europe, but I don't

Re: [e-users] Thinktux.net CVS Mirror

2006-01-23 Thread Daniel Kasak
Pascal Schwarz wrote: We got some problems with our mirror, we need to get another server. Forgive me if this is a silly suggestion, but how about having a daily cvs snapshot tarball thing shared via p2p? This is for re-compilers only - of course developers still need a cvs server. Dan

Re: [e-users] Thinktux.net CVS Mirror

2006-01-23 Thread David Seikel
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 12:03:32 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > i think it may be time to set up an anonymous cvs mirror network for > e. i might consider turning sf.net anon cvs access off if this > network proves to work well. hena is settign up another anonymous

Re: [e-users] Thinktux.net CVS Mirror

2006-01-23 Thread The Rasterman
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 19:09:05 +0100 Pascal Schwarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > a cvs server which is able to take the load (we had up to 25gb traffic a > day, and it still grew) > Our server was not really under high load of other applications, but we > saw that cvs sometimes took a lot of cpu p

Re: [e-users] Thinktux.net CVS Mirror

2006-01-23 Thread The Rasterman
On Mon, 23 Jan 2006 18:56:02 +0100 Pascal Schwarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > We got some problems with our mirror, we need to get another server. > > Details available here: > http://pascal-schwarz.ch/blog/index.php/2006/01/23/e17-cvs-mirror-news/ that's sad - but ineivtable. anon cvs puts a

Re: [e-users] Thinktux.net CVS Mirror

2006-01-23 Thread The Rasterman
On Tue, 24 Jan 2006 02:59:14 +0100 Morten Nilsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> babbled: > Pascal Schwarz wrote: > > a cvs server which is able to take the load (we had up to 25gb traffic a > > day, and it still grew) > > 25gb is very obscure.. do you mean 25Gb or 25GB? > > I'm guessing GB, but it is best

Re: [e-users] Thinktux.net CVS Mirror

2006-01-23 Thread Morten Nilsen
Pascal Schwarz wrote: a cvs server which is able to take the load (we had up to 25gb traffic a day, and it still grew) 25gb is very obscure.. do you mean 25Gb or 25GB? I'm guessing GB, but it is best to be sure. Cheers, -- Morten :wq --- T

Re: [e-users] Thinktux.net CVS Mirror

2006-01-23 Thread adi
Hello, I can help you with the cvs server. i have a p4 2G, 1G ram, plenty of disk space... and the connection is 100mbit but it shares a 155mbit with other servers and in general only 30mbit are free in peak hours. send me an email it you think that this could help. best regards adi On 1/23/06,

Re: [e-users] Thinktux.net CVS Mirror

2006-01-23 Thread Pascal Schwarz
thinktux is located at hetzner.de and is connected with 100mbit to a not so bad backbone. On Mon, 2006-01-23 at 13:34 -0500, Geoffrey wrote: > What kind of bandwidth are we talking about here? > > -- > Until later, Geoffrey -- Pascal Schwarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> signature.asc Description: Thi

Re: [e-users] Thinktux.net CVS Mirror

2006-01-23 Thread Geoffrey
Pascal Schwarz wrote: We got some problems with our mirror, we need to get another server. Details available here: http://pascal-schwarz.ch/blog/index.php/2006/01/23/e17-cvs-mirror-news/ What kind of bandwidth are we talking about here? -- Until later, Geoffrey

Re: [e-users] Thinktux.net CVS Mirror

2006-01-23 Thread David Coulson
Pascal Schwarz wrote: > a cvs server which is able to take the load (we had up to 25gb traffic a > day, and it still grew) > Our server was not really under high load of other applications, but we > saw that cvs sometimes took a lot of cpu power Is this for enlightenment primary CVS, or mirroring

Re: [e-users] Thinktux.net CVS Mirror

2006-01-23 Thread Pascal Schwarz
a cvs server which is able to take the load (we had up to 25gb traffic a day, and it still grew) Our server was not really under high load of other applications, but we saw that cvs sometimes took a lot of cpu power On Mon, 2006-01-23 at 13:03 -0500, David Coulson wrote: > I may be able to help -

Re: [e-users] Thinktux.net CVS Mirror

2006-01-23 Thread David Coulson
Pascal Schwarz wrote: > We got some problems with our mirror, we need to get another server. > > Details available here: > http://pascal-schwarz.ch/blog/index.php/2006/01/23/e17-cvs-mirror-news/ I may be able to help - What exactly is required? David -- David J. Coulson email: [EMAIL PROTEC

[e-users] Thinktux.net CVS Mirror

2006-01-23 Thread Pascal Schwarz
We got some problems with our mirror, we need to get another server. Details available here: http://pascal-schwarz.ch/blog/index.php/2006/01/23/e17-cvs-mirror-news/ -- Pascal Schwarz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part