Re: [e-users] OpenGL rendering

2006-02-01 Thread mista
Am Mittwoch, den 01.02.2006, 09:08 +0900 schrieb Carsten Haitzler: On Tue, 31 Jan 2006 23:09:45 + mista [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled: Am Dienstag, den 31.01.2006, 10:27 +0900 schrieb Carsten Haitzler: you need to implmenent text, gradient, line and polygon re3dnering still. the rest

Re: [e-users] OpenGL rendering

2006-02-01 Thread mista
Sorry. The mentioned problem with xcompmgr was produced only by it, not by e. --- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX search engine that makes searching your

Re: [e-users] OpenGL rendering: sorry i won't open my mouth again

2006-02-01 Thread Curtis Napier
Jesse Luehrs wrote: On Wed, 01 Feb 2006 15:35:39 -0500 Curtis Napier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I disagree, how are the devs at Xorg supposed to know that this is an issue if no one tells them? I know this particular issue is very well known in the Xorg community but nevertheless, someone

Re: [e-users] OpenGL rendering: sorry i won't open my mouth again

2006-02-01 Thread Dènis Riedijk
On 2/2/06, Curtis Napier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: SNIPThey probably are sick and tired of it. I would be if I was them. Butthat doesn't matter. The FOSS way is for *someone* to inform them ofE17's needs. If they choose to work on that or not is up to them but if no one ever tells them E17's needs

Re: [e-users] OpenGL rendering: sorry i won't open my mouth again

2006-01-31 Thread Florent Thiery
I really am sorry about this, i didn't read realize that the discussion had beed closed already... Just a simple question though, how is the rendering mode of Mac OSX? Hardware or software? Will the Aero engine of Vista be the first totally-hardware-driven graphical engine? Carsten Haitzler

Re: [e-users] OpenGL rendering: sorry i won't open my mouth again

2006-01-31 Thread Jesse Luehrs
On Tue, 31 Jan 2006 15:14:36 +0100 Florent Thiery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I really am sorry about this, i didn't read realize that the discussion had beed closed already... Just a simple question though, how is the rendering mode of Mac OSX? Hardware or software? Will the Aero engine of

Re: [e-users] OpenGL rendering: sorry i won't open my mouth again

2006-01-31 Thread Виктор Кожухаров
On Tue, 2006-01-31 at 09:48 -0600, Jesse Luehrs wrote: On Tue, 31 Jan 2006 15:14:36 +0100 Florent Thiery [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I really am sorry about this, i didn't read realize that the discussion had beed closed already... Just a simple question though, how is the rendering mode of

Re: [e-users] OpenGL rendering: sorry i won't open my mouth again

2006-01-31 Thread Jesse Luehrs
On Tue, 31 Jan 2006 18:31:18 +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: that's a very bad advice. don't bug the xorg devs, unless its important. they have enough trouble reviving x as it is. I wasn't entirely serious(: My point was just that they would actually be able to do something about it, unlike the

Re: [e-users] OpenGL rendering

2006-01-31 Thread mista
Am Dienstag, den 31.01.2006, 10:27 +0900 schrieb Carsten Haitzler: now as i was saying - forget it. i am sick to death of having this discussion every few weeks - repeatedly. either setup up - learn to code and fix the engine yourself and address these issues in the gl engine AND in all the

Re: [e-users] OpenGL rendering: sorry i won't open my mouth again

2006-01-31 Thread The Rasterman
On Tue, 31 Jan 2006 15:14:36 +0100 Florent Thiery [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled: I really am sorry about this, i didn't read realize that the discussion had beed closed already... Just a simple question though, how is the rendering mode of Mac OSX? Hardware or software? Will the Aero engine of

Re: [e-users] OpenGL rendering

2006-01-31 Thread The Rasterman
On Tue, 31 Jan 2006 23:09:45 + mista [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled: Am Dienstag, den 31.01.2006, 10:27 +0900 schrieb Carsten Haitzler: now as i was saying - forget it. i am sick to death of having this discussion every few weeks - repeatedly. either setup up - learn to code and fix

Re: [e-users] OpenGL rendering: sorry i won't open my mouth again

2006-01-31 Thread The Rasterman
On Wed, 1 Feb 2006 09:01:52 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled: On Tue, 31 Jan 2006 15:14:36 +0100 Florent Thiery [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled: I really am sorry about this, i didn't read realize that the discussion had beed closed already... Just a simple

Re: [e-users] OpenGL rendering

2006-01-30 Thread The Rasterman
On Mon, 30 Jan 2006 23:41:48 +1100 Daniel Kasak [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled: Скворцов Никита wrote: Good day! I was wondering, if anybody is using E17 with OpenGL rendering engine as default? Is it stable in any way? At least workable? =) It's not ready yet. Rest assured there

Re: [e-users] OpenGL rendering

2006-01-30 Thread Geoffrey
Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: On Mon, 30 Jan 2006 23:41:48 +1100 Daniel Kasak [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled: Скворцов Никита wrote: Good day! I was wondering, if anybody is using E17 with OpenGL rendering engine as default? Is it stable in any way? At least workable? =) It's not

Re: [e-users] OpenGL rendering

2006-01-30 Thread Florent Thiery
Geoffrey a écrit : Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) wrote: On Mon, 30 Jan 2006 23:41:48 +1100 Daniel Kasak [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled: Скворцов Никита wrote: Good day! I was wondering, if anybody is using E17 with OpenGL rendering engine as default? Is it stable in any

Re: [e-users] OpenGL rendering

2006-01-30 Thread The Rasterman
On Mon, 30 Jan 2006 19:37:40 +0100 Florent Thiery [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled: Yup :) How far is the implementation of Hardware/Software OpenGL rendering? Of course the most interesting part of it would be the hardware opengl. I must say that DR17 is a performance-eater, except if you cut

Re: [e-users] OpenGL rendering

2006-01-30 Thread David Seikel
OpenGL? Just say NO! Think I'll have a good look at the FAO and see if it is adequate. pgppDoy2ffXyH.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [e-users] OpenGL rendering

2006-01-30 Thread David Seikel
On Tue, 31 Jan 2006 12:45:43 +0900 Carsten Haitzler (The Rasterman) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 31 Jan 2006 11:47:04 +1000 David Seikel [EMAIL PROTECTED] babbled: OpenGL? Just say NO! Think I'll have a good look at the FAO and see if it is adequate. you assume people read