Re: [Mozilla Enterprise] ESR questions

2016-04-14 Thread Delise, John
We actually use the RR (rapid release) version and not the ESR to 1700 machines using SCCM, we use the built-in uninstaller of Firefox to always uninstall first then install the latest version. We are fortunate to have the PolicyPak Application Manager from PolicyPak Software where we use

Re: [Mozilla Enterprise] EXTERNAL: Re: Pop-up whitelist in ESR 45

2016-04-14 Thread Kasper, Ryan V
Great point Mike – yes the issue only manifested on new installations for us! That is why then – existing users had it migrated automatically by Firefox. Thanks, Ryan Kasper Lockheed Martin Software Distribution ryan.v.kas...@lmco.com From: Enterprise

Re: [Mozilla Enterprise] ESR questions

2016-04-14 Thread florence.gluckman
Hi At Orange France, we also use FF ESR with SCCM for about 100 000 PC Bien cordialement florence +33 (0) 6 74 35 54 53 De : Enterprise [mailto:enterprise-boun...@mozilla.org] De la part de Skrivseth, Daniel Envoyé : jeudi 14 avril 2016 16:30 À : Heaton, Joseph@Wildlife;

Re: [Mozilla Enterprise] ESR questions

2016-04-14 Thread Skrivseth, Daniel
I also use SCCM to deploy applications and have a better success rate with Firefox than any other software. I find it easier to manage than the standard version of Firefox. The slower adoption of new features is appreciated by my users who are not always fans of change. I use a vbscript to do

Re: [Mozilla Enterprise] ESR questions

2016-04-14 Thread The Wanderer
On 2016-04-14 at 09:51, Heaton, Joseph@Wildlife wrote: > Does ESR make Firefox any easier to manage in the enterprise? I have > around 3400 PCs spread throughout the state, some of which don't > connect to the network with any regularity. Historically, the major advantage of ESR has been the

[Mozilla Enterprise] ESR questions

2016-04-14 Thread Heaton, Joseph@Wildlife
Does ESR make Firefox any easier to manage in the enterprise? I have around 3400 PCs spread throughout the state, some of which don't connect to the network with any regularity. Is it difficult to implement? I use SCCM for most software deployments, and we would also bake it into the gold

Re: [Mozilla Enterprise] Windows 10?

2016-04-14 Thread Eric Periard
I've been running FF ESR since the early alpha days, worked just fine Eruc -Original Message- From: Enterprise [mailto:enterprise-boun...@mozilla.org] On Behalf Of Sebastian Metzger Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2016 2:31 AM To: enterprise@mozilla.org Subject: Re: [Mozilla Enterprise]

Re: [Mozilla Enterprise] Pop-up whitelist in ESR 45

2016-04-14 Thread Kaply Consulting
My guess is that because your sqlite file was already prefilled, it got migrated to the new format. If you are explicitly adding the entries, you need to add both. Mike On Thu, Apr 14, 2016 at 2:37 AM, Sebastian Metzger < sebastian.metz...@debeka.de> wrote: > Hello, > > we are using a

Re: [Mozilla Enterprise] Pop-up whitelist in ESR 45

2016-04-14 Thread Sebastian Metzger
Hello, we are using a prefilled permissions.sqlite. In which we added hosts in the format "testpage.com". Because of the suggestions made, I thought that I have to add http://testpage.com and https://testpage.com since ff42. But it still seems to work with testpage.com in ff45esr. Did I

Re: [Mozilla Enterprise] Windows 10?

2016-04-14 Thread Sebastian Metzger
Hello, please see https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/40.0/releasenotes/ Therefore Windows is official (!) supported since Firefox 40RR. Therefore Firefox 45ESR seems to be the first official Firefox ESR release for windows 10. In other words when you plan to migrate to windows 10 now,