Re: [Mozilla Enterprise] WG: Restore Classic Print Preview Dialog Box UI in Mozilla Firefox

On 3/30/2021, 10:59:49 PM, Paul Kosinski via Enterprise wrote: > On Tue, 30 Mar 2021 16:54:13 -0400 > Tanstaafl wrote: >> That said - chromium is in no way 'Google', other than, yes, some >> google engineers contribute to the codebase. > Then why does Chromium's default h

Re: [Mozilla Enterprise] WG: Restore Classic Print Preview Dialog Box UI in Mozilla Firefox

Source doesn't guarantee it's > desirability: Chromium is Open Source, but it's too much tied into Google > infrastructure to be totally trustworthy. > > > On Tue, 30 Mar 2021 10:50:20 -0400 > Tanstaafl wrote: > >> On 2/28/2021 1:29 PM, Thane K. Sherrington wrote >&g

Re: [Mozilla Enterprise] WG: Restore Classic Print Preview Dialog Box UI in Mozilla Firefox

On 3/30/2021 10:50 AM, Tanstaafl wrote > Most importantly, like Thane said, I won't be coming back... unless > Mozilla does something spectacular to make me give it another look - > like, opening up the UI to Addons at the same or similar level that > XUL allowed. Oh - and only if

Re: [Mozilla Enterprise] WG: Restore Classic Print Preview Dialog Box UI in Mozilla Firefox

On 2/28/2021 1:29 PM, Thane K. Sherrington wrote > Mike, my complaint (and the complaint I get from my clients) is the > lack of Simplify Printing.    I get that it's "coming soon" but that's > not the way to roll out a brand new printing system.  Finish it, then > roll it out.  The regular

Re: [Mozilla Enterprise] Naming the installation files

Just created one for Thunderbird too: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1593748 On Mon Nov 04 2019 12:09:41 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time), Tanstaafl wrote: > I just did because this has been annoying me for a while too... > > https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?i

Re: [Mozilla Enterprise] Naming the installation files

I just did because this has been annoying me for a while too... https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1593740 Is there a way to desigate this one to both Firefox and Thunderbird? Or do I need to create one for Thunderbird too? On Mon Nov 04 2019 09:39:49 GMT-0500 (Eastern Standard Time),

Re: [Mozilla Enterprise] Firefox ESR Offline Patching solution.

On Mon Jul 29 2019 12:37:48 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time), Mike Kaply wrote: > I have an (very) old post that describes this: > > https://mike.kaply.com/2007/03/26/deploying-firefox-2-within-the-enterprise-part-5/ > > I think some things have change slightly since then (particular the >

Re: [Mozilla Enterprise] PDF files are printed in the wrong orientation

On 7/15/2019, 3:30:13 PM, Eddie Rowe wrote: > We also hardened our Adobe Reader setup using the DoD STIG so it nice > to have one set of settings to manage in GPO on the Windows side (we > don’t speak Mac or Linux). Eddie, can you elaborate on this? IS this a GPO template or something that

Re: [Mozilla Enterprise] Mozilla FF ESR - Slack Support Group?

On Fri Jul 12 2019 16:00:17 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time), Paul Kosinski wrote: > No, they don't activate *your* camera (AFAIK). What can happen is that > if a Facebook member posts your picture, Ah, I forgot about pictures... crap... my sister posts a lot of pictures on fb. I hate social

Re: [Mozilla Enterprise] Mozilla FF ESR - Slack Support Group?

On Thu Jul 11 2019 21:06:01 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time), Paul Kosinski wrote: > They do face recognition (even of non-users), How, exactly does that work? Are you implying that they somehow secretly activate my camera, cause the physical slider switch that blocks it to move to the unblocked

Re: [Mozilla Enterprise] Firefox ESR 60.7.2 released

On Fri Jun 21 2019 03:59:33 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time), < wrote: > Is this new version as critical as ESR 60.7.1 ? > > We’re currently updating all our computers in urgency from ESR 60.6.3 > (or below) to ESR 60.7.1 > > Do we need absolutely to do the same process to update urgently to

Re: [Mozilla Enterprise] FirefoxESR 60 and Windows 10 edition 1803 Problems installing.

I'm on the list, please don't reply to me directly (it breaks Reply To List for me). On Thu May 17 2018 06:43:45 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time), William Spratt wrote: > > > Not my call.  Sometimes you’ve just got to play the cards your dealt.  > In this case I have

Re: [Mozilla Enterprise] FirefoxESR 60 and Windows 10 edition 1803 Problems installing.

I'd never heard of Avecto Defendpoint, and after investigating, I see why. A tool apparently aimed at Admins/Entities that think they need to provide Local Admin privileges to all users - that can't properly interact with UAC? Sorry, but my advice is dump the useless tool. On Thu May 17 2018

Re: [Mozilla Enterprise] differences between 60 and 60esr?

On 5/8/2018, 3:43:28 PM, Mike Kaply wrote: > I can promise you that won't happen. The only place where we would have > a domain joined requirement is on Rapid Release. I'm curious - since ESR is more intended for organizations who want something more stable - and are more

Re: [Mozilla Enterprise] ESR52 vs "modern" javascript

On Fri Apr 20 2018 22:14:04 GMT-0400 (Eastern Standard Time), John R. Sweet wrote: > This conflict between "modern javascript" and legacy extensions -- > or whatever the heck is going on -- is a really bad situation. We > need a couple of extensions that won't work past v

Re: [Mozilla Enterprise] OT: Duplicate messages from list

On 9/16/2016 7:08 AM, William Spratt wrote: > For the record we have an exchange server and I'm only getting one copy of > each e-mail. Exchange can do de-duplication, which could explain why you aren't seeing them... ___

Re: [Mozilla Enterprise] OT: Duplicate messages from list

On 9/15/2016 11:19 PM, Andrew J. Buehler wrote: > I also receive mail via IMAP, albeit through Thunderbird, so there's a > chance it may be IMAP-related somehow; do any of the people who have > reported (offlist, thus far) that they don't see the problem use IMAP? I use

Re: [Mozilla Enterprise] Add-on Signing in ESR

illa, who are the developers of Firefox. > > Daniel Wolf > > -Original Message- > From: Enterprise [mailto:enterprise-boun...@mozilla.org] On Behalf Of Timo > Pietilä > Sent: Tuesday, February 2, 2016 12:04 AM > To: enterprise@mozilla.org > Subject: Re: [Mozilla Enterpri