fallback method if unavailable).
So I don't think there is a big risk.
Even if I'm disappointed that we won't have this API for 45 ESR, I
understand the reasons Mozilla gives : it's certainly better this way.
Regards,
Mossroy
Links:
--
[1] http://caniuse.com/#f
e if the bug is in Firefox, in wininet.dll, or
in the F5 VPN that creates the connection). See
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1218767
If someone knows who I should ping at Mozilla to get more attention on
this issue, that would be helpful.
Mossroy
Le 06/01/2016 12:18, Harrison, Ri
rid of them.
I understood that Flash would be an exception for this NPAPI removal, so
maybe Mozilla might allow us to add some other exceptions (through
autoconfig or CCK2)?
Regards,
Mossroy ___
Enterprise mailing list
Enterprise@mozilla.org
https
other extensions (that
might be installed by the user).
Regards,
Mossroy
___
Enterprise mailing list
Enterprise@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enterprise
To unsubscribe from this list, please visit
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/enter
and 1 enabled.
Manually modifying the file does the trick, but I would hate to have to
do that programmatically.
Isn't there a way to set that property through autoconfig? Did anybody
try to do such thing?
Regards,
Mossroy
Le 17-09-2016 20:42, Mossroy a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> Ho
Hi,
Recent versions of Firefox have restricted some technical possibilities
to deploy extensions on Firefox.
Using https://mike.kaply.com/cck2/ is probably the easiest way to do
that. It will also allow you to customize many other things in Firefox.
Regards,
Mossroy
Le 21/09/2016 à 21:46
ificates from the
windows certificate store. It's not available in ESR versions for now,
and I did not test it. See archives of this mailing-list : it has been
discussed in November 2016.
Regards,
Mossroy
Le 28/12/2016 à 15:15, Kim, James a écrit :
>
> Good morning,
>
>
&
I would also put a reverse-proxy in front of the old server.
I did something very similar, for an old Oracle server too :
https://blog.mossroy.fr/2015/02/27/un-reverse-proxy-apache-pour-acceder-a-de-vieux-serveurs-en-sslv3/
[2] (in French)
Regards,
Mossroy
Le 06-02-2017 15:26, Osdoba
Mike, can you elaborate on how to do that with CCK2?
I did not find a relevant parameter in the UI of CCK2 2.2.3.2
Regards,
Mossroy
Le 11/05/2017 à 16:44, Kaply Consulting a écrit :
> You can do this with the CCK2 but it has to be individual domains.
>
> Mike
>
> On May 11
ure.
>
> If you go to Certificates->Overrides, you can specify domains for
> which the certificate security information is bypassed.
>
> So you can add domains that have self signed certificates, for instance.
>
> Mike
>
> On Sun, May 21, 2017 at 9:33 AM, Mossroy
Hi,
We've been using the IETab addon for many years on Firefox ESR :
https://addons.mozilla.org/fr/firefox/addon/ie-tab-2-ff-36/ [1]
This addon also contains a plugin. We're perfectly aware that, as any
Firefox plugin, it will stop working in Firefox RR>=53 and Firefox
ESR>=59. But it's supp
Le 30-05-2017 13:22, James Pearson a écrit :
> Mossroy wrote:
>
>> Some comments in addons.mozilla.org seem to indicate that it might
>> simply come from the declared maxVersion in rdf. But, if I modify it,
>> it breaks the extension signing, so Firefox refuses to
Le 30/05/2017 à 13:47, Mossroy a écrit :
>
> Le 30-05-2017 13:22, James Pearson a écrit :
>
>> Mossroy wrote:
>>>
>>> Some comments in addons.mozilla.org seem to indicate that it might
>>> simply come from the declared maxVersion in rdf. But, if I modify i
Thanks Mike,
I did not find any relevant bug, so I opened
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1369516
I'd be grateful if you helped getting some attention on it.
Regards,
Mossroy
Le 01/06/2017 à 19:11, Kaply Consulting a écrit :
> My guess is that it was marked as inco
52.x branch (as initially planned).
Regards,
Mossroy
Le 06/06/2017 à 18:58, Jorge Villalobos a écrit :
> I responded in the bug. The available options are to ask the developer
> to update the add-on metadata (I'll give that a try) or use an usigned
> fork of the add-on.
>
> Jo
browser.tabs.remote.separateFileUriProcess
to true.
They marked it as fixed in Firefox 55.
However, they marked version 52 ESR as "unaffected". Maybe you could
check with the testcase? Because if it's really affected, we should ask
to backport the fix to the ESR branch too.
Regards,
Mossroy
Le 02/
lenz
>
> Telefon: (02 61) 4 98 - 31 05
> Telefax: (02 61) 4 98 - 20 99
>
> E-Mail: sebastian.metz...@debeka.de
> Internet: www.debeka.de
>
> Besuchen Sie uns auch in sozialen Netzwerken.
> Unsere Adressen finden Sie hier: www.debeka.de/socialmedia
>
> Pflichtangaben der De
7;m talking about the
Firefox extension (installed from https://mike.kaply.com/cck2/), that
lets us generate the autoconfig. I'm asking because it does not look
like a webextension.
Regards,
Mossroy
___
Enterprise mailing list
En
Le 11-01-2018 09:36, Marco Gaiarin a écrit :
> Mandi! Joel Sanderi
> In chel di` si favelave...
>
>> I need help on how to silently install and enable a Firefox Add-on within an
>> organization.
>
> Probably there's complex answers, but briefly:
>
> a) enable 'autoconfig':
> http://mike.ka
It should probably work with the following autoconfig lines :
lockPref("browser.cache.disk.capacity", 35);
lockPref("browser.cache.disk.smart_size.enabled", false);
Le 22-02-2018 15:11, Kumar Kondru a écrit :
> Hi All,
>
> Do we restrict or lock the cache size with 350MB in Firefox v
20 matches
Mail list logo
