Re: [EPEL-devel] Proposal for Python 3 packaging in EPEL 7

2015-01-09 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On 9 January 2015 at 07:38, Bohuslav Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com wrote: Dave, thanks for the input. Yes, it's technically possible to put both dashes and dots in package name, although I'm sort of failing to see what the benefit of doing that would be. Is this for readability only? For me,

Re: [EPEL-devel] EPEL meeting minutes 2015-01-09

2015-01-09 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On 9 January 2015 at 13:04, Mátyás Selmeci mat...@cs.wisc.edu wrote: On 01/09/15 12:04, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/epel/2015-01-09/epel.2015-01-09-17.00.log.html 17:03:30 smooge OK we don't have much old business from the last meeting because it was a

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

2015-01-09 Thread updates
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 992 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5620/bugzilla-3.4.14-2.el6 211 https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2014-1616/puppet-2.7.26-1.el6 82

Re: [EPEL-devel] EPEL meeting minutes 2015-01-09

2015-01-09 Thread Mátyás Selmeci
On 01/09/15 12:04, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/epel/2015-01-09/epel.2015-01-09-17.00.log.html 17:03:30 smooge OK we don't have much old business from the last meeting because it was a couple of weeks ago 17:03:45 smooge We had the orphaning and tyll found

Re: [EPEL-devel] EPEL meeting minutes 2015-01-09

2015-01-09 Thread Mátyás Selmeci
On 01/09/15 15:44, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: On 9 January 2015 at 13:04, Mátyás Selmeci mat...@cs.wisc.edu mailto:mat...@cs.wisc.edu wrote: On 01/09/15 12:04, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/epel/2015-01-09/epel.2015-01-09-17.00.log.html 17:03:30

Re: [EPEL-devel] EPEL meeting minutes 2015-01-09

2015-01-09 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On 9 January 2015 at 15:20, Mátyás Selmeci mat...@cs.wisc.edu wrote: On 01/09/15 15:44, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: On 9 January 2015 at 13:04, Mátyás Selmeci mat...@cs.wisc.edu wrote: On 01/09/15 12:04, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:

Re: [EPEL-devel] Proposal for Python 3 packaging in EPEL 7

2015-01-09 Thread Bohuslav Kabrda
- Original Message - Is the EPIC proposal totally dead? It seems like that would be a nicer and more general solution to this problem (not wanting to ship a Python 3.x stack for 10 years). I'm not sure about that, but I think we can align python3 in epel with EPIC even if EPIC is

Re: [EPEL-devel] Proposal for Python 3 packaging in EPEL 7

2015-01-09 Thread Bohuslav Kabrda
On 7 January 2015 at 04:05, Bohuslav Kabrda bkab...@redhat.com wrote: - Original Message - Hi all, I know I've been promising this for quite some time to several people, so I finally managed to put together a proposal for packaging Python 3 in EPEL 7 (it'd

Re: [EPEL-devel] Proposal for Python 3 packaging in EPEL 7

2015-01-09 Thread Bohuslav Kabrda
- Original Message - On Wed, 2015-01-07 at 06:05 -0500, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote: - Original Message - Hi all, I know I've been promising this for quite some time to several people, so I finally managed to put together a proposal for packaging Python 3 in EPEL 7