>>> So it's been discussed a little about doing a EPEL bootstrap for new
>>> architectures. We have a number of arches wanting to do this (ppc64le,
>>> aarch64, i686, s390x). So ppc64le will be our first and this is an
>>> overview of the process I'll be using to do it. Once it's complete
>>> I'll
>> So it's been discussed a little about doing a EPEL bootstrap for new
>> architectures. We have a number of arches wanting to do this (ppc64le,
>> aarch64, i686, s390x). So ppc64le will be our first and this is an
>> overview of the process I'll be using to do it. Once it's complete
>> I'll do a
On 11/25/2015 04:48 PM, Dan Horák wrote:
On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 15:25:21 +
Peter Robinson wrote:
Hi All,
So it's been discussed a little about doing a EPEL bootstrap for new
architectures. We have a number of arches wanting to do this (ppc64le,
aarch64, i686, s390x). So ppc64le will be our f
On Wed, 25 Nov 2015 15:25:21 +
Peter Robinson wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> So it's been discussed a little about doing a EPEL bootstrap for new
> architectures. We have a number of arches wanting to do this (ppc64le,
> aarch64, i686, s390x). So ppc64le will be our first and this is an
> overview of
Hi All,
So it's been discussed a little about doing a EPEL bootstrap for new
architectures. We have a number of arches wanting to do this (ppc64le,
aarch64, i686, s390x). So ppc64le will be our first and this is an
overview of the process I'll be using to do it. Once it's complete
I'll do a better
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 2:32 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> Could some please run a repoclosure/broken deps report for EPEL7 with
> RHEL7.2? I tried, but I only have rhel7 server which is missing some
> components in the EPEL7 buildroot. So I think this will have to be done by
> releng. It seems
On Wed, Nov 25, 2015 at 5:14 AM, Gang U Xu wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Our HW is P8.
> Do you know if EPEL 7 support ppc6e little endian?
>
> I can find some packages with ppc64.
> For example, https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/epel/7/ppc64/
> I guess it is big endian but not sure.
>
> Could anyone confi