On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 05:02:42PM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 8/26/19 2:33 AM, Petr Pisar wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 01:56:09PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > > So, I see the following options for how to handle default streams in RHEL
> > > 8
> > >
> > > Option 1: We disallow
On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 08:44:56PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 5:49 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >
> > On 8/23/19 10:56 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> ...
>
> > > For default profiles, we have some options as well:
> > >
> > > Option 1: We disallow setting default prof
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
12 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-3012c9e1ad
bird-1.6.8-1.el6
12 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-04a99d9149
seamonkey-2.49.5-2.el6
8 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.or
On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 1:56 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> As you know, we delayed support of Modularity in EPEL (called
> Application Streams in RHEL) until 8.1 while we worked out some
> remaining issues. Some of those issues were technical, but we have a
> few others that will come down to po
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 4:33 AM Petr Pisar wrote:
>
> On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 01:56:09PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > So, I see the following options for how to handle default streams in RHEL 8
> >
> > Option 1: We disallow assigning default streams at all within EPEL 8.
> > This will prote
On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 5:49 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On 8/23/19 10:56 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
...
> > For default profiles, we have some options as well:
> >
> > Option 1: We disallow setting default profiles for EPEL streams. Pros:
> > no risk of conflict with RHEL, should they now or in
On 8/26/19 2:33 AM, Petr Pisar wrote:
On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 01:56:09PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
So, I see the following options for how to handle default streams in RHEL 8
Option 1: We disallow assigning default streams at all within EPEL 8.
This will protect us against a future change
On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 5:54 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> After the announcement today of centos-stream, I wonder if it would make
> sense to move epel8-playground to build against that instead of the
> latest rhel8 release?
>
> It would make playground less usefull for testing new radical changes
>
On 9/24/19 4:41 PM, Troy Dawson wrote:
Actually, looking closer, there is not package called "vulkan".
So, not having 'vulkan-devel' is very logical.
For RHEL8 vulkan synced with F29, which split it's packaging up. In
vulkan's place is
vulkan-headers
vulkan-loader
vulkan-tools
vulkan-validatio
After the announcement today of centos-stream, I wonder if it would make
sense to move epel8-playground to build against that instead of the
latest rhel8 release?
It would make playground less usefull for testing new radical changes
against the current stable point release, but on the other hand,
Actually, looking closer, there is not package called "vulkan".
So, not having 'vulkan-devel' is very logical.
For RHEL8 vulkan synced with F29, which split it's packaging up. In
vulkan's place is
vulkan-headers
vulkan-loader
vulkan-tools
vulkan-validation-layers
So, look what you would use in
On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 at 17:18, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
>
> The lack of uniformity among arches on RHEL 8 is becoming annoying.
>
> The latest one is a head-scratcher:
>
> No matching package to install: 'vulkan-devel'
>
> Really? RHEL 8 is not shipping vulkan on all arches?
>
The only vulkan-de
Is this really an architecture variance?
Which architecture *has* vulkan-devel?
On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 2:18 PM Michael Cronenworth wrote:
>
> The lack of uniformity among arches on RHEL 8 is becoming annoying.
>
> The latest one is a head-scratcher:
>
> No matching package to install: 'vulkan-de
The lack of uniformity among arches on RHEL 8 is becoming annoying.
The latest one is a head-scratcher:
No matching package to install: 'vulkan-devel'
Really? RHEL 8 is not shipping vulkan on all arches?
Thanks,
Michael
___
epel-devel mailing list --
Add to this weeks meeting:
#topic How to add volunteers who just want to focus on EPEL packages?
On Tue, 24 Sep 2019 at 14:00, wrote:
>
> Dear all,
>
> You are kindly invited to the meeting:
>EPEL Steering Co on 2019-09-25 from 18:00:00 to 19:00:00 GMT
>At freenode@fedora-meeting
>
> The
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
EPEL Steering Co on 2019-09-25 from 18:00:00 to 19:00:00 GMT
At freenode@fedora-meeting
The meeting will be about:
This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting. A general agenda is the
following:
#meetingname EPEL
#topic Intro
I have released new mock-core-configs with epel-8-* configs which points to
CentOS 8 plus EPEL.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?packages=mock-core-configs
Please test it and report any issues.
--
Miroslav Suchy, RHCA
Red Hat, Associate Manager ABRT/Copr, #brno, #fedora-buildsys
_
17 matches
Mail list logo
