On 11.10.20 23:29, Nick Howitt wrote:
> How do you intend to handle the switch to PHP7.3?
Not sure yet - I wanted to make sure it even makes sense to keep
nextcloud in EPEL7 first. But that's another reason it's probably risky
to jump people from NC10 to NC18+ (NC13 was the last release to
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
9 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-f853880b07
prosody-0.11.7-1.el6
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing
kyotocabinet-1.2.78-1.el6
Details about builds:
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
12 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-98b234afda
libuv-1.40.0-1.el7
9 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-bd6a96cd24
python34-3.4.10-7.el7
9
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
9 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-0f2bfced63
prosody-0.11.7-1.el8
4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-b15161810d
pdns-4.3.1-1.el8
The following builds have been
On 11/10/2020 18:22, Christopher Engelhard wrote:
On 11.10.20 15:10, H wrote:
I'd like it updated, and kept updated, for EPEL 7.
Do you happen to have a system with the current 10.0.something EPEL7
package set up & would you be willing to - if I make an updated package
- test the upgrade
On 11.10.20 15:10, H wrote:
> I'd like it updated, and kept updated, for EPEL 7.
Do you happen to have a system with the current 10.0.something EPEL7
package set up & would you be willing to - if I make an updated package
- test the upgrade process? I could set up something myself, but I think
On Sun, Oct 11, 2020 at 07:47:22AM +0200, Christopher Engelhard wrote:
> Hi,
> the nextcloud server package is currently stuck at ancient version 10
> (current is 20) in EPEL7 (It's not (yet) available EPEL8 repos).
>
> I'd like to fix that, but
>
> - upstream releases a new version roughly
On Sun, Oct 11, 2020 at 02:05:20PM +0200, Christopher Engelhard wrote:
> I'm sort of hesitant to dive into learning how modularity works, though
> ... although, maybe a good opportunity to learn.
The spin-up is a little rougher than we'd hoped, but once you've got it set
up it shouldn't be too
On October 11, 2020 7:57:45 AM EDT, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
>Le dim. 11 oct. 2020 à 07:47, Christopher Engelhard a
>écrit :
>>
>> Hi,
>> the nextcloud server package is currently stuck at ancient version 10
>> (current is 20) in EPEL7 (It's not (yet) available EPEL8 repos).
>>
>> I'd like to fix
The version check can be disabled in NC:
diff -Naur -b nextcloud/lib/private/Updater.php
nextcloud.njh/lib/private/Updater.php
--- nextcloud/lib/private/Updater.php 2019-04-08 15:22:33.0 -0600
+++ nextcloud.tjr/lib/private/Updater.php 2019-05-20 12:48:46.007165729
-0600
@@ -188,14
One thing I forgot that makes things even worse:
- upstream does not support updates across more than one major version,
so anybody who actually has the old v10 installed will have their
installation completely broken by ANY update at this point
- for the same reason, trying to limit major
On 11.10.20 13:57, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
> I'm fine with retiring it.
>
> But on the alternatives , you can have modules (or application
> streams) for both epel and fedora.
> It would be a good way forward. so it won't enforce nextcloud version
> with a given fedora and or epel and would allow
Hi,
Same as in nextcloud, I'm proposing to retire blender from epel7.
The packaged version if still working is very old and unmaintained.
(there are lots of unfixed CVE).
Having a full featured and modern blender there looks out of reach.
Thanks.
--
-
Nicolas (kwizart)
Le dim. 11 oct. 2020 à 07:47, Christopher Engelhard a écrit :
>
> Hi,
> the nextcloud server package is currently stuck at ancient version 10
> (current is 20) in EPEL7 (It's not (yet) available EPEL8 repos).
>
> I'd like to fix that, but
>
> - upstream releases a new version roughly every 4
Hello Alexandre!
On 11.09.20 20:52, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
The rationale is that many Fedora packagers do not specifically care
about EL, and with their long release cycles the maintenance burden is
higher (e.g. upgrading to fix a security vulnerability might not be
possible if the newer
15 matches
Mail list logo
