[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing report

2022-06-17 Thread updates
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing: Age URL 4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-17d14b279e python-bottle-0.12.21-2.el8 1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-8d638fabd8 restic-0.13.1-1.el8 The following builds have

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

2022-06-17 Thread updates
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-0286a0e93a python-bottle-0.12.21-1.el7 3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-a9236c0113 oniguruma-6.8.2-2.el7 The following builds

[EPEL-devel] Re: Thoughts: epel-release auto-enable crb repo

2022-06-17 Thread Troy Dawson
On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 1:41 PM Troy Dawson wrote: > > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 1:20 PM Carl George wrote: > >> On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 8:33 AM Troy Dawson wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 10:22 PM Carl George wrote: >> >> >> >> On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 5:12 PM Troy Dawson

[EPEL-devel] Re: Thoughts: epel-release auto-enable crb repo

2022-06-17 Thread Maxwell G via epel-devel
On Friday, June 17, 2022 9:03:07 AM CDT Patrick Riehecky via epel-devel wrote: > This way any extra ideas for actions can be added easily later on. > Perhaps a "check" or "status" to see if CRB is enabled/disabled/not- > what-the-os-ships. +1. Having some logic to check if CRB is actually enabled

[EPEL-devel] Re: Request for fence-agents-pve package

2022-06-17 Thread Carl George
On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 8:31 AM Alex Talaran wrote: > > would anyone be willing to package this in epel or help get it in the > existing package please? > > i asked on bugzilla [1] but the current maintainer isnt able to help at > the moment. from what i can tell it might just need uncommented in

[EPEL-devel] Re: Thoughts: epel-release auto-enable crb repo

2022-06-17 Thread Troy Dawson
On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 1:20 PM Carl George wrote: > On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 8:33 AM Troy Dawson wrote: > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 10:22 PM Carl George wrote: > >> > >> On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 5:12 PM Troy Dawson wrote: > >> > > >> > I'm totally top-posting, and I apologize for

[EPEL-devel] Re: Thoughts: epel-release auto-enable crb repo

2022-06-17 Thread Carl George
On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 8:33 AM Troy Dawson wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 10:22 PM Carl George wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 5:12 PM Troy Dawson wrote: >> > >> > I'm totally top-posting, and I apologize for that. >> > >> > For right now, I'm going to put my enable-crb script in

[EPEL-devel] Re: Thoughts: epel-release auto-enable crb repo

2022-06-17 Thread Patrick Riehecky via epel-devel
On Fri, 2022-06-17 at 06:33 -0700, Troy Dawson wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 10:22 PM Carl George wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 5:12 PM Troy Dawson > > wrote: > > > > > > I'm totally top-posting, and I apologize for that. > > > > > > For right now, I'm going to put my enable-crb

[EPEL-devel] Re: Thoughts: epel-release auto-enable crb repo

2022-06-17 Thread Mike Rochefort
On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 9:33 AM Troy Dawson wrote: > I notice that you said crb-enable, crb-disable. > Do you like having the name first, or the function first? I'd put in a vote for "object action" like Carl denoted. As a side note, and this is more for personal learning/clarification, is

[EPEL-devel] Re: Thoughts: epel-release auto-enable crb repo

2022-06-17 Thread Troy Dawson
On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 10:22 PM Carl George wrote: > On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 5:12 PM Troy Dawson wrote: > > > > I'm totally top-posting, and I apologize for that. > > > > For right now, I'm going to put my enable-crb script in epel-release, > but not automatically run it in a %post script or

[EPEL-devel] Request for fence-agents-pve package

2022-06-17 Thread Alex Talaran
would anyone be willing to package this in epel or help get it in the existing package please? i asked on bugzilla [1] but the current maintainer isnt able to help at the moment. from what i can tell it might just need uncommented in the spec file [2]. someone else asked about it [1][3] and