wouldnt think make split packages vs all the agents just in the -epel
package as i originally submitted? im fine either way just not clear.
do i need to make other changes or does the rest seem ok since i am not
tied to requiring man pages?
On 2022-08-25 08:29, Troy Dawson wrote:
For the
For the names, the source rpm needs to have the -epel suffice
(fence-agents-epel) but then all the "missing" packages have the same name
they would have if they were in RHEL or Fedora. So in this case they would
be
fence-agents-pve
fence-agents-raritan
fence-agents-rcd-serial
fence-agents-virsh
i dont need them but wasnt sure if required for epel to keep things
complete and similar to the base package. how did you want me to change
the names? i left it the same as in the original spec file, and named
this one -epel after previous discussion on list
On 2022-08-24 17:13, Troy Dawson
I'm sure having all the fence agents in one package is nice for you, but if
someone has both Fedora and RHEL based machines, they would appreciate the
packages having the same naming conventions.
This is looking pretty good.
I'll do some poking about for the man pages. How badly do you want the
attached a new spec using 4.10 which should match el9 (desired distro
version) as you noted.
srpm and rpm still seem to build fine without man pages, still not sure
how to generate them.
On 2022-08-08 17:22, Troy Dawson wrote:
Hi Alex,
I've been looking into this some.
What distribution do
rhel 9 ideally.
i was starting with the fedora spec file as i didn't know about needing
the match. it isnt clear why some of these are not included in the rhel
package but most are. i tried to search on the fence-agents github and
bugzilla. does the pve one for instance need something too new
Hi Alex,
I've been looking into this some.
What distribution do you want this for?
I haven't seen anywhere in your emails saying if this is for RHEL 8 or RHEL
9?
The spec file you have attached is for fence-agents-4.11, which is only in
Fedora, so that doesn't let me know either.
The major
i was able to get this built and installable if anyone wants to help
test or maintain it.
an issue exists with the man pages not being built still but im not sure
how the makefile target works for these so they are excluded for now.
maybe some other small tweaks are still needed too since its
