[EPEL-devel] Re: Proposal: EPEL9 timeline

On Wed, 10 Feb 2021 at 14:48, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 10. 02. 21 20:24, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, 10 Feb 2021 at 14:19, Miro Hrončok > > wrote: > > > > On 10. 02. 21 19:53, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > fedpkg-minimal > > >

[EPEL-devel] Re: Proposal: EPEL9 timeline

On 10. 02. 21 20:24, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: On Wed, 10 Feb 2021 at 14:19, Miro Hrončok > wrote: On 10. 02. 21 19:53, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > fedpkg-minimal > epel-release > epel-rpm-macros Those make perfect sense to me. >

[EPEL-devel] Re: Proposal: EPEL9 timeline

On Wed, 10 Feb 2021 at 14:24, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > On Wed, 10 Feb 2021 at 14:19, Miro Hrončok wrote: > >> On 10. 02. 21 19:53, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: >> > fedpkg-minimal >> > epel-release >> > epel-rpm-macros >> >> >> Those make perfect sense to me. >> >> > fedpkg >> > koji >>

[EPEL-devel] Re: Proposal: EPEL9 timeline

On Wed, 10 Feb 2021 at 14:19, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 10. 02. 21 19:53, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > fedpkg-minimal > > epel-release > > epel-rpm-macros > > > Those make perfect sense to me. > > > fedpkg > > koji > > bodhi > > But I don't understand why those are required. What am I missing?

[EPEL-devel] Re: Proposal: EPEL9 timeline

On 10. 02. 21 19:53, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: fedpkg-minimal epel-release epel-rpm-macros Those make perfect sense to me. fedpkg koji bodhi But I don't understand why those are required. What am I missing? -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok

[EPEL-devel] Re: Proposal: EPEL9 timeline

On Mon, 8 Feb 2021 at 17:36, Troy Dawson wrote: > On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 11:50 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 08:19:24AM -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > There is a little nuance here. In order to get the repository going, > we had > > > to 'mass-branch' about 40

[EPEL-devel] Re: Proposal: EPEL9 timeline

On Mon, Feb 8, 2021 at 11:50 AM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 08:19:24AM -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > There is a little nuance here. In order to get the repository going, we had > > to 'mass-branch' about 40 or so packages. fedpkg and some other items > > require quite

[EPEL-devel] Re: Proposal: EPEL9 timeline

On 08. 02. 21 14:19, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: There is a little nuance here. In order to get the repository going, we had to 'mass-branch' about 40 or so packages. fedpkg and some other items require quite a few packages which all have to be done at once. Without those you can't build

[EPEL-devel] Re: Proposal: EPEL9 timeline

On Mon, Feb 08, 2021 at 08:19:24AM -0500, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > There is a little nuance here. In order to get the repository going, we had > to 'mass-branch' about 40 or so packages. fedpkg and some other items > require quite a few packages which all have to be done at once. Without >

[EPEL-devel] Re: Proposal: EPEL9 timeline

On Sun, 7 Feb 2021 at 18:26, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Overall this seems fine to me, a few nitpicks inline... > > On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 01:51:15PM -0800, Troy Dawson wrote: > > This is a proposal. It's mainly writing down what I think most of us > > agreed on at last weeks EPEL Steering Committee

[EPEL-devel] Re: Proposal: EPEL9 timeline

Overall this seems fine to me, a few nitpicks inline... On Fri, Feb 05, 2021 at 01:51:15PM -0800, Troy Dawson wrote: > This is a proposal. It's mainly writing down what I think most of us > agreed on at last weeks EPEL Steering Committee meeting. Feel free to > continue to discuss and/or have