On Wed, Feb 08, 2023 at 02:31:39PM -0800, Troy Dawson wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > If I am reading this correctly, the only package affected would be
> > > > drgn (from python-drgn).
> > > > It should hopefully just need a rebuild.
> > > > Is that correct?
> > > > Were you planning on rebuilding
On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 1:19 PM Michel Alexandre Salim <
sali...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 2023-02-08 at 14:09 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 12:37 PM Troy Dawson
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 9:21 AM Michel Alexandre Salim
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> >
On Wed, 2023-02-08 at 14:09 -0500, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 12:37 PM Troy Dawson
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 9:21 AM Michel Alexandre Salim
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Per the incompatible upgrade policy[1] I'm proposing upgrading
> > >
On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 12:37 PM Troy Dawson wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 9:21 AM Michel Alexandre Salim
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Per the incompatible upgrade policy[1] I'm proposing upgrading
>> libkdumpfile from 0.4.1 to the latest 0.5.1 in both EPEL 8 and 9.
>>
>> Bugzilla issues:
>>
On Wed, Feb 8, 2023 at 9:21 AM Michel Alexandre Salim <
sali...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Per the incompatible upgrade policy[1] I'm proposing upgrading
> libkdumpfile from 0.4.1 to the latest 0.5.1 in both EPEL 8 and 9.
>
> Bugzilla issues:
> -
