On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 6:28 PM, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 04:47:04PM -0800, Dave Peterson wrote:
Wouldn't this be a perfect use case for Software Collections?
http://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/Fedora_Contributor_Documentation/1/html/
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 6:00 AM, Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.comwrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/16/2014 10:14 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Wed, 15 Jan 2014 10:32:18 -0500 Stephen Gallagher
sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
Perhaps this would be a good time to
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 08:05:23AM -0700, Dave Johansen wrote:
system.so we've mostly decided that things in the system shouldn't use SCLs
to work. So we still need to solve the problem of newer python interpreter
and newer django framework for use with apps that EPEL ships.
What about
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 10:55:09AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 08:05:23AM -0700, Dave Johansen wrote:
system.so we've mostly decided that things in the system shouldn't use
SCLs
to work. So we still need to solve the problem of newer python
interpreter
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 09:48:18AM -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
Packages for Infrastructure and Clouds, I think). I was thinking about this
more recently in the context of things we need for Fedora.next in the
coming year or so. The new repo might target both EL and Fedora and provide
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 01:57:18PM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Fri, Jan 17, 2014 at 09:48:18AM -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
Packages for Infrastructure and Clouds, I think). I was thinking about
this
more recently in the context of things we need for Fedora.next in the
coming
On Fri, 17 Jan 2014 08:00:58 -0500
Stephen Gallagher sgall...@redhat.com wrote:
My thoughts are these (in no particular order).
* Treat this branch like Rawhide. All builds targeted at this are
composed to a repo. Signing is nice, but not mandatory in my opinion.
It's pretty much impossible
On Tue, Jan 14, 2014 at 12:35:00PM -0700, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
1) Does providing python-3.4 mean that 3.4 will be the only python every
provided by EPEL?
On Fedora ew have a python package which points to the 2.7 series and a
python3 package which points to the 3.3 series of python. I
