Re: EPEL and SCL

2014-03-20 Thread Karsten Wade
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 03/20/2014 05:30 PM, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote: I've never heard of this EPIC repository and google doesn't seem to know it either. Where can this be found? It doesn't exist, it's an idea that Robyn has floated semi-seriously as a way to

Re: EPEL EpSCO Email Meeting:

2014-09-04 Thread Karsten Wade
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/04/2014 02:05 PM, Jim Perrin wrote: Perhaps this is an issue where a shorter life-cycle expectation needs to be set? For anything related to the new repo, this is an important part of the idea. We want to set a new expectation with the new

Re: [EPEL-devel] Meeting face to face CentOS Project and EPEL

2015-01-06 Thread Karsten Wade
On 01/05/2015 12:39 PM, Till Maas wrote: Hi, On Fri, Jan 02, 2015 at 01:27:16AM +, Karanbir Singh wrote: we are working to arrange a meeting with the EPEL folks at Fosdem 2015, on 31st Jan at 7pm ( venue to be confirmed ), to try and workout some options on how the two efforts might

Re: [EPEL-devel] [CentOS-devel] Meeting face to face CentOS Project and EPEL

2015-01-04 Thread Karsten Wade
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/01/2015 06:59 PM, Brian Stinson wrote: On Jan 02 01:27, Karanbir Singh wrote: hi, crossposting this to centos-devel and epel-devel we are working to arrange a meeting with the EPEL folks at Fosdem 2015, on 31st Jan at 7pm ( venue to be

Re: [EPEL-devel] [Proposal] Converge EPEL and CBS

2015-09-22 Thread Karsten Wade
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/22/2015 12:18 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > Also, this would probibly be some kind of big deal to some > people who like that EPEL is built against rhel. > Personally, I don't think it matters, but it would have to > be

Re: [EPEL-devel] [CentOS-devel] [Proposal] Converge EPEL and CBS

2015-09-21 Thread Karsten Wade
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/21/2015 07:12 AM, Haïkel wrote: > * EPEL will use CentOS repositories instead of mirroring RHEL > repositories Worth noting that one of the values people get (or perceive) about EPEL is that it is built against RHEL repositories. This is really

Re: [EPEL-devel] [Proposal] Converge EPEL and CBS

2015-09-23 Thread Karsten Wade
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 09/23/2015 09:49 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On 23 September 2015 at 10:31, Matthew Miller > <mat...@fedoraproject.org> wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 08:45:32PM -0700, Karsten Wade wrote: >>> AIUI, the conc

[EPEL-devel] Re: 32 bit revisited

2016-10-20 Thread Karsten Wade
cOn 10/20/2016 07:06 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Sun, 16 Oct 2016 21:54:44 -0700 > Karsten Wade <kw...@redhat.com> wrote: > >> On 10/15/2016 10:43 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >>> On Sat, 15 Oct 2016 07:54:25 + (UTC) >>> john tatt <zika...@yahoo.com>

[EPEL-devel] Re: 32 bit revisited

2016-10-20 Thread Karsten Wade
On 10/20/2016 01:17 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Thu, Oct 20, 2016 at 12:55:02PM -0700, Karsten Wade wrote: >> Part of my thinking is the situation where CentOS SIGs need EPEL >> packages and (aiui currently) have to import to git.centos.org and build >> the packages on cb

[EPEL-devel] Re: 32 bit revisited

2016-10-16 Thread Karsten Wade
CentOS CI... I'll go out for a stretch here and ask ... what if we build not only against CentOS CI but in the CentOS build system? - Karsten -- Karsten Wade Community Infra & Platform (Mgr) Open Source and Standards, @redhatopen @quaid gpg: AD0E0C41 sig