Count me in for meeting B (I'd love to help if you don't mind getting
endless questions for a while Conor), and seeing as I'm a PhD student
ant time is good too :)
Joel.
On Tue, 19 Oct 2004 17:41:49 +0100, Conor McBride <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thorsten Altenkirch wrote:
> > If I'd only know
|Monday |Tuesday |Wednesday|Thursday |Friday |Saturday |Sunday |
Oct| | |20 |21 |22 |23 |24 |Oct
Oct|25 |26 |27 |28 X|29X |30 X |31 X |Oct
Nov|1|2|3|4 X|5 X |6 X |7
Thorsten Altenkirch wrote:
Another one for the "implementors mtg"?
Certainly. Soon!
I propose Nottingham/Beeston as a venue. We could have the offical part
on the campus and the inoffical part in the Victorial Hotel in Beeston.
I am happy to organize the official part.
Sounds reasonable...
Judgem
Another one for the "implementors mtg"?
Certainly. Soon!
I propose Nottingham/Beeston as a venue. We could have the offical part
on the campus and the inoffical part in the Victorial Hotel in Beeston.
I am happy to organize the official part.
After Judgement Day we know whether we have money to sp
James,
You are right on the point about distinguishing stable and experimental
releases - this seems quite important, given recent events. Any volunteers
for this?
Ideally we should also have some kind of automatic basic testing as well,
to prevent obvious breakages. Volunteers? There are fragme
Adam Megacz wrote:
[ forwarded to the public list at Dr. McBride's request; I also]
[ realized that I neglected to mention Gilmore's ITT as a possible ]
[ solution ]
What is Gilmore's ITT (is this Stephen Gilmore, is he doing Types these
[ forwarded to the public list at Dr. McBride's request; I also]
[ realized that I neglected to mention Gilmore's ITT as a possible ]
[ solution ]
..One thing I wanted to mention to you -- I noticed that you assumed
Type:Type in your la
