On Mon, Apr 20, 2020 at 12:43 pm, Jeremiah C. Foster
wrote:
Right, this is where we are as well since we want the default browser
(Epiphany) to be sandboxed and flatpak is the current best practice.
There are other alternatives that might be useful for containment but
as you see the
Hello,
Before I reply in-line, just wanted to say thanks Michael for your
replies, they have been very helpful for understanding how web app
creation works in Epiphany.
On Wed, 2020-04-15 at 15:56 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 4:25 pm, Jeremiah C. Foster
> wrote:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 4:25 pm, Jeremiah C. Foster
wrote:
On Wed, 2020-04-15 at 14:22 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
Well you must have some appstream metadata, or the web app will not
appear in GNOME Software. But Epiphany itself never looks at the
appstream metadata. I would
On Wed, 2020-04-15 at 14:22 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> Well you must have some appstream metadata, or the web app will not
> appear in GNOME Software. But Epiphany itself never looks at the
> appstream metadata. I would completely ignore that page of the spec
> because none of that
Well you must have some appstream metadata, or the web app will not
appear in GNOME Software. But Epiphany itself never looks at the
appstream metadata. I would completely ignore that page of the spec
because none of that metadata will be used for anything.
If you want web apps to have
On Wed, 2020-04-15 at 12:21 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 12:12 pm, Michael Catanzaro
> wrote:
> > You can still distribute Epiphany web apps and install them in
> > GNOME
> > Software, just create a package that contains a desktop file, like
> > this:
>
> Though
I sent an email in reply to Jeremiah C. Foster and didn't CC to
epiphany-list (I'm not used to mailing lists). Coincidentally, Michael
Catanzaro addressed a lot of what I said:
On 15/04/20 17:55, David wrote:
On 15/04/20 17:28, Jeremiah C. Foster via epiphany-list wrote:
Using the distro
On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 12:12 pm, Michael Catanzaro
wrote:
You can still distribute Epiphany web apps and install them in GNOME
Software, just create a package that contains a desktop file, like
this:
Though don't copy the MimeType=text/plain; as that registers the app as
a text editor for
On Wed, Apr 15, 2020 at 12:28 pm, Jeremiah C. Foster via epiphany-list
wrote:
Using the distro package is smart, but it pushes users back to the
command line because GNOME Software doesn't have support for Epiphany
web apps. This means there are no icons viewable via GNOME Software,
the app
Hello,
On Wed, 15 Apr 2020 12:28:12 -0400, "Jeremiah C. Foster via epiphany-list"
wrote:
> On Wed, 2020-04-15 at 17:35 +0200, Carlos Garcia Campos wrote:
> > El mié, 15-04-2020 a las 11:25 -0400, Jeremiah C. Foster via
> > epiphany-
> > list escribió:
> > > On Tue, 2020-04-14 at 15:46 -0500,
On Wed, 2020-04-15 at 17:35 +0200, Carlos Garcia Campos wrote:
> El mié, 15-04-2020 a las 11:25 -0400, Jeremiah C. Foster via
> epiphany-
> list escribió:
> > On Tue, 2020-04-14 at 15:46 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> > > Well we removed Epiphany web app support from GNOME Software,
> > >
El mié, 15-04-2020 a las 11:25 -0400, Jeremiah C. Foster via epiphany-
list escribió:
> On Tue, 2020-04-14 at 15:46 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> > Well we removed Epiphany web app support from GNOME Software,
> > because
> > it has never worked well.
> >
> > But Epiphany itself still
On Tue, 2020-04-14 at 15:46 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> Well we removed Epiphany web app support from GNOME Software,
> because
> it has never worked well.
>
> But Epiphany itself still supports creating web apps, except when
> running under flatpak.
Flatpak is the preferred way to
Well we removed Epiphany web app support from GNOME Software, because
it has never worked well.
But Epiphany itself still supports creating web apps, except when
running under flatpak.
___
epiphany-list mailing list
epiphany-list@gnome.org
On Sun, 2020-04-12 at 11:48 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 7:52 pm, David via epiphany-list
> wrote:
> > 5. Is there any interest in implementing such features?
>
> I don't plan to spend time on web apps anytime soon myself. Sorry. :/
It's my understanding that GNOME
On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 7:52 pm, David via epiphany-list
wrote:
5. Is there any interest in implementing such features?
I don't plan to spend time on web apps anytime soon myself. Sorry. :/
___
epiphany-list mailing list
epiphany-list@gnome.org
Hello. Since there seam to be no official forum-like place to discuss
Epiphany, make suggestions to devs and ask questions, I'm writing an
email that fits all three categories, about the WebApps feature.
I find the feature quite amazing, it has the potencial to change how
GNU/Linux users
17 matches
Mail list logo
