On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 5:20 AM, Jeff McAffer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I should have mentioned...
- Please enter a bug for this with your good steps. Thanks!
- We have been running the installer on windows and the Mac quite regularly
and even via JNLP. This must be a quirk in the build as
The deadlock you describe sounds similar to the issues we were dealing with
in bug https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=199103 and
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=186280. Both of these bugs
have been addressed in 3.4. What version of Declarative Services are you
using?
I'm running with a fairly recent version of the ProSyst DS. I don't think
this deadlock is the same as the ones in the bugs you mention though (we
saw those earlier before we got patches for those). Specifically, those
bugs don't involve lazy bundle starting.
It seems to me that there's an
Thanks John and Andrew,
I was able to create metadata that looks sane. There was some issues with a
trailing \n\ following the license in my feature.properties that ended up
as illegal XML characters in the content.xml though. I was as suggested using
the following properties in the build
Open a bug with the errors you are getting.
|
| From: |
|
--|
|Alex Blewitt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm not sure why you cannot just activate every bundle at launch if you
don't care about lazy activation. Is that what you tried to do but it
failed?
A testcase would really help here. You mention lots of locks below but I'm
not sure if these are class loader locks established by the vm or
The map file has been updated for the following Bug changes:
+ Bug 232159. Can't access update site with 3.4.0 I20080502-0100 (FIXED)
The following projects have changed:
org.eclipse.osgi
Tom
___
equinox-dev mailing list
equinox-dev@eclipse.org
The map file has been updated for the following Bug changes:
+ Bug 218532. [ui] IUs below the root that have licenses need to be
surfaced to user (FIXED)
+ Bug 228542. [ui] Check for updates presents wrong licenses to be
accepted (FIXED)
+ Bug 231642. [ui] [repo] I can add the same repo twice
