[equinox-dev] org.eclipse.osgi_3.4.2.R34x_v20080826-1230 defines ExecutionEnvironment: J2SE-1.5

2008-10-10 Thread Heiko Seeberger
Hi, After updating to 3.4.1 I had some issues with my test cases for Equinox Aspects. The reason was, that the latest version of the system bundle now defines Java 5 as the first execution environment: Bundle-RequiredExecutionEnvironment: J2SE-1.5,OSGi/Minimum-1.1 Is this by intention? If

[equinox-dev] Disable default start of Jetty.

2008-10-10 Thread Srijith Kochunni
Hi All, I want to use Jetty servlet container to host my servlets within OSGi, however, the equinox.http.jetty bundle seems to start jetty by default on port 80, or the port specified by the org.osgi.service.http.port property in config.ini. However I want to programmatically start the

Re: [equinox-dev] org.eclipse.osgi_3.4.2.R34x_v20080826-1230 defines ExecutionEnvironment: J2SE-1.5

2008-10-10 Thread Thomas Watson
Hi Heiko, The reason this was added was to avoid compilation errors when importing org.eclipse.osgi into your workspace as source from the target SDK. The org.eclipse.osgi project supports the OSGi minimum 1.1 execution environment but will make use of additional classes from J2SE 1.4 and 1.5

Re: [equinox-dev] Disable default start of Jetty.

2008-10-10 Thread Simon Kaegi
You can disable the autostarting of the deafult instance by setting the framework property: org.eclipse.equinox.http.jetty.autostart=false -Simon | | From: | |

Re: [equinox-dev] org.eclipse.osgi_3.4.2.R34x_v20080826-1230 defines ExecutionEnvironment: J2SE-1.5

2008-10-10 Thread Jeff McAffer
I believe there is a property we can put in the build.properties to tell PDE which EE to use for compilation purposes. This seems like the safer and more explicit path regardless of any issues Heiko may be seeing. Jeff Thomas Watson wrote: Hi Heiko, The reason this was added was to

Re: [equinox-dev] org.eclipse.osgi_3.4.2.R34x_v20080826-1230 defines ExecutionEnvironment: J2SE-1.5

2008-10-10 Thread Thomas Watson
We use those properties in the build.properties file in CVS to setup our advanced classpath during the real build. And besides, the build.properties from the CVS project is not the same as the one used by PDE when you import as source. In this case PDE generates one for you based on the

Re: [equinox-dev] org.eclipse.osgi_3.4.2.R34x_v20080826-1230 defines ExecutionEnvironment: J2SE-1.5

2008-10-10 Thread Jeff McAffer
sigh. is another option to include the build.properties in the source and get PDE to use it? I am more curious than expecting a change here. I agree that it is unusual that the BREE content/ordering is causing an issue... Jeff Thomas Watson wrote: We use those properties in the

Re: [equinox-dev] normalized jar

2008-10-10 Thread Andrew Niefer
I would suggest trying 3.4M7 where that bug was first fixed, or just move up to 3.4. Or if there are other problems upgrading, try at least taking org.eclipse.update.core from 3.4 -Andrew Janet Dmitrovich [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 10/09/2008 05:29 PM Please respond to

RE: [equinox-dev] BSF, Groovy, OSGi - class resolution

2008-10-10 Thread Craig Phillips
Hi, Well, I'm about to throw in the towel, regarding BSF; I think I'll move to javax.scripting and see where that leads (which is a bit unwieldy, I know)... I've tried bsfManager.setClassPath() -- that doesn't work; I've tried bsfManager.setClassLoader() with just about every class loader

Re: [equinox-dev] normalized jar

2008-10-10 Thread Janet Dmitrovich
I ran jarsigner -verify against the jars first after normalize and sign, all the jars came back jar verified then packed the jars ( pack200 ) Then installed ( and so unpacked ) on a number of these I get the error jarsigner: java.lang.SecurityException: SHA1 digest error for ..class Does