The map file has been updated for the following Bug changes:
+ Bug 168281. [launcher] JNI launching fails on aix.ppc (FIXED)
+ Bug 196890. Equinox 3.3 HttpService bundle not OSGi/Minimum-1.1
compliant. (ASSIGNED)
+ Bug 202496. [Launcher] Variable substitution in .ee files (FIXED)
+ Bug 204812. Ex
I successfully created a director application and launched it to provision
the sdk using the -data C:\temp\workspace -configuration
C:\temp\workspace\.config when there was still a configuration directory in
the directory application install tree. However when I removed this
configuration and
I've just updated the project sets to remove rhino.
Pascal Rapicault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
10/15/2007 10:27 AM
Please respond to Equinox development mailing list
To: Equinox development mailing list
cc:
Subject:Re: [equinox-dev] [
Done
|>
| From: |
|>
>--|
|Pascal Rapicault/Ottawa/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
This is because the map files and the features have not been updated yet.
I will take care of this.
|>
| From: |
|>
>--|
This is excellent news. The version of the DownloadManagerStrategy
I'm working on for M3 won't have the complexity to be able to take
advantage of this new capability, but we will definitely be looking
at using this in the M4 version which will have the more complex
multi-threaded algorith
I repopulated my workspace with head this morning. The org.mozilla.rhino
plugin was still in the workspace. I was expecting it to be removed since
Simon's changes.___
equinox-dev mailing list
equinox-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/lis
FYI (especially Tim Webb),
ECF has added the partial file download to the file transfer API as per
these bugs from Equinox Summit:
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=205011
https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=204386
ECF 1.2 will be coming out this week, please consider vo
We should develop some of our own testcases to get complete coverage. The
OSGi test suite can be used by the committers (which are also OSGi members)
during our test pass for each mile stone. The OSGi test cases should not
be considered as a complete test suite, in many cases they will let bugs
All of the bundles that implement OSGi defined services:
org.eclipse.equinox.ds
org.eclipse.equinox.ip
org.eclipse.equinox.wireadmin
org.eclipse.equinox.io
pass the corresponding OSGi test cases. How you proceed in this case because OSGi test cases are not publicly available?
-Pavlin
We also will need to setup automated tests for the bundles which are
graduated. (See https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=206333)
Tom
From: Thomas Watson/Austin/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
The bundles contributed by Prosyst have been in the incubator since July.
The codebase Prosyst donated is already production quality and has been
used in many products at Prosyst. A small number of issues have been
reported against the bundles in the incubator. But these are to be
expected and
ok but then "split phase" is too general. We need a term to talk about
the case where one downloads the stuff and then later does the
install/configure.
Jeff
John Arthorne/Ottawa/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
10/15/2007 08:56 AM
Please respond to
Equinox development mailing
We also have a "sizing phase" for computing the install size, which the UI
decouples from the other phases when a preview is shown to the user prior
to downloading. There will likely be other cases as the number of phases
grows.
I definitely don't suggest such terminology be exposed to end user
14 matches
Mail list logo
