One minor thing about todays HEAD:
org.eclipse.equinox.internal.provisional.p2.engine.phases.Messages has
an incorrect BUNDLE_NAME, this one is missing a provisional...
Thanks. Fixed in HEAD.
___
equinox-dev mailing list
equinox-dev@eclipse.org
Hi Pascal,
this sounds very exciting. The more I understand about P2, the more I
realize how similar it is to what we (Cloudsmith) are planning to do. We
are very interested in participating and with a somewhat aggressive
schedule that involves several committers. The work with the mirroring
We have been working to get the p2 tests integrated with the build so they
are run as part of the automated test framework. Unfortuanatly we have some
tests which are testing (and therefore referencing) bundles which aren't
included in the SDK so there were failures. We have pulled these tests
Hi Pascal and all,
Some additional participation opportunities:
- Multi-threaded downloads using ECF
- User interface for configuring/pausing/resuming/managing downloads
- Use/testing of bittorrent for downloads (and/or other protocols)
- Integration/UI of dynamic repository discovery, both in
Hi Folks,
Sorry, I realize I may have stepped on (Susan's) toes WRT the UI items
below.
Susan can comment (if she wants) on whether participation on the below
fits in with her/others plans in those areas.
Scott
Scott Lewis wrote:
Hi Pascal and all,
Some additional participation
Sorry, I realize I may have stepped on (Susan's) toes WRT the UI items
below.
No worries, Scott!
- User interface for configuring/pausing/resuming/managing downloads
Do you mean something at the ECF level? Or in p2?
In p2 we currently rely on the platform UI progress view rather than
present p2
Yeah, I see your point. It really belongs as some kind of Remote
Communication UI Support stuff available for all plug-ins. Especially now
that ECF is in the SDK via p2
I could imagine the day when
- update sites, CVS repos, etc. are all using ECF
- all of these things use the same security
Hi Pascal,
Pascal Rapicault wrote:
- Multi-threaded downloads using ECF
What do you have in mind here that is different from what we already
have in today?
We currently are not using multiple threads to download different
sections of a single (large) file...e.g. thread 1:
Hi Jeff,
Jeff McAffer wrote:
While we are all loving each other I feel obliged to say that the focus of
this call to action was (I believe) helping p2 *ship in 3.4* with a
reasonable function level.
It wasn't apparent to me that the original participation solicitation
was scoped to be
