Hi all, was triaging a bug today and found this missing from the
dropdown combo. Could someone please add 3.6.2 to the list? Thanks.
Regards,
Remy
___
equinox-dev mailing list
equinox-dev@eclipse.org
https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 12:07 PM, Ian Skerrett wrote:
> FWIW, I was on the Equinox home page http://eclipse.org/equinox/ and clicked
> on the right-hand link labeled 'planning' which took me to
> http://wiki.eclipse.org/Equinox/Plan.
Yeah I stopped relying on the websites once the new standard pl
On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 11:44 AM, Ian Skerrett wrote:
> Where can I find the Equinox plan for the Helios release? I looked at
> http://wiki.eclipse.org/Equinox/Plan/Helios but I am assuming this is not
> complete? Is this a work in progress or is it located somewhere else?
I'm guessing it's t
Will this spawn a new p2 newsgroup too or should all "non-dev"
questions continue to funnel into eclipse.technology.equinox?
Remy
On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 10:23 AM, John Arthorne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> +1
>
> I would read both anyway so it makes no difference to me. But since there is
> cle
Hi Scott,
I think you are missing org.eclipse.osgi from HEAD?
http://dev.eclipse.org/mhonarc/lists/equinox-dev/msg04114.html
Regards,
Rem
On Sun, Apr 20, 2008 at 6:15 PM, Scott Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hey all,
>
> In 3.4M6a, I just updated to the latest of all the projects in
> org.e
That's an IBM internal mirror, no?
Remy
On Tue, Apr 15, 2008 at 1:18 PM, DJ Houghton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Peter,
>
> We have an Eclipse Update Site with bundles from the latest integration
> builds available here: http://fullmoon.ottawa.ibm.com/eclipse/testUpdates/
> The content in thi
; > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:equinox-dev-
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Remy Chi Jian Suen
> > Sent: Thursday, February 14, 2008 2:15 PM
> > To: Equinox development mailing list
>
> > Subject: Re: [equinox-dev] [prov] peer-to-peer downloads (ECF)
>
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 2:12 PM, Scott Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Good point :). ECF does have a bittorrent provider as well:
>
> CVS
>
> /cvsroot/technology/org.eclipse.ecf/providers/org.eclipse.ecf.provider.bittorrent
> which depends upon
> /cvsroot/technology/org.eclipse.ecf/incub
age (and can't do a Move because
> there are already two existing pages, or because you want to have a landing
> page direct to a Category [1]), just do something like this:
>
> #REDIRECT [[:Category:Eclipse_Web_Tools_Platform_Project]]
>
> [1] http://wiki.eclipse.org/Web_T
On 10/31/07, Scott Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Right, so bundles that require those packages to compile or run would have
> to specify EE of JRE 1.4 (or higher)...in other words they can't specifiy
> 1.1 and be assured of getting those optional packages. Please correct if
> this is wrong i
On 10/31/07, Scott Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I understand this, as the JAAS
> work depends upon packages like javax.security.auth, and
> javax.security.auth.login, etc. which do not seem to be in CDC
> 1.1/Foundation 1.1.
Those packages are marked as "optional". I don't know how that all
Foundation 1.1 sounds good as it does include the
javax.security.auth.*packages as optional API.
http://jcp.org/en/jsr/detail?id=219
Regards,
Rem
On 8/16/07, Jeff McAffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Something small would be good. Foundation 1.1 might be a good option?
>
> Jeff
>
>
>
> *"M
ECJ will not flag class usage issues (it does for generics, but that's a
syntax issue, per se). "Perfect match" for EEs are the only way to prevent
yourself from using the wrong classes, I believe.
Regards,
Rem
On 8/13/07, David R Stevenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> Hi, Tim,
>
> The faux p
You're not alone, Alex. I think ip is a horrible name.
initprovisioning or initprov or something would've been better.
There's just no way that someone's going to know that 'ip' is 'initial
provisioning'.
Regards,
Rem
On 7/7/07, Alex Blewitt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Am I really the only one w
14 matches
Mail list logo
