[equinox-dev] Need 3.6.2 target milestone option in Bugzilla...

2011-02-26 Thread Remy Chi Jian Suen
Hi all, was triaging a bug today and found this missing from the dropdown combo. Could someone please add 3.6.2 to the list? Thanks. Regards, Remy ___ equinox-dev mailing list equinox-dev@eclipse.org https://dev.eclipse.org/mailman/listinfo/equinox-dev

Re: [equinox-dev] Time for a p2 list?

2008-07-07 Thread Remy Chi Jian Suen
Will this spawn a new p2 newsgroup too or should all non-dev questions continue to funnel into eclipse.technology.equinox? Remy On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 10:23 AM, John Arthorne [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: +1 I would read both anyway so it makes no difference to me. But since there is clearly a

Re: [equinox-dev] [prov] peer-to-peer downloads (ECF)

2008-02-15 Thread Remy Chi Jian Suen
!= individual files) they have so that they can upload/download from each other...not sure if that answers your question as you probably knew about that already. Rem Jeff -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:equinox-dev- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Remy Chi Jian

Re: [equinox-dev] [prov] peer-to-peer downloads (ECF)

2008-02-14 Thread Remy Chi Jian Suen
On Thu, Feb 14, 2008 at 2:12 PM, Scott Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Good point :). ECF does have a bittorrent provider as well: CVS /cvsroot/technology/org.eclipse.ecf/providers/org.eclipse.ecf.provider.bittorrent which depends upon

Re: [equinox-dev] Fw: [cross-project-issues-dev] Wiki standardization?

2007-12-14 Thread Remy Chi Jian Suen
Of course one aspect of naming that Remy didn't mention is the over-verbose page titles like Eclipse Web Tools Platform Project when Web Tools Project would work just as well. ;-) $0.02, Nick On Nov 17, 2007 12:17 PM, Remy Chi Jian Suen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I know a wiki is supposed

Re: [equinox-dev] [sec] questions about EE for security

2007-10-31 Thread Remy Chi Jian Suen
On 10/31/07, Scott Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I understand this, as the JAAS work depends upon packages like javax.security.auth, and javax.security.auth.login, etc. which do not seem to be in CDC 1.1/Foundation 1.1. Those packages are marked as optional. I don't know how that all works

Re: [equinox-dev] [sec] questions about EE for security

2007-10-31 Thread Remy Chi Jian Suen
On 10/31/07, Scott Lewis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Right, so bundles that require those packages to compile or run would have to specify EE of JRE 1.4 (or higher)...in other words they can't specifiy 1.1 and be assured of getting those optional packages. Please correct if this is wrong in any