Re: [equinox-dev] [sec] questions about EE for security

2007-11-01 Thread Jeff McAffer
g Thomas Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/01/2007 09:28 AM Please respond to Equinox development mailing list To Equinox development mailing list cc Subject Re: [equinox-dev] [sec] questions about EE for security Both John and Rem are correct. Bundle

Re: [equinox-dev] [sec] questions about EE for security

2007-11-01 Thread Oleg Besedin
TED]> Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 11/01/2007 09:28 AM Please respond to Equinox development mailing list To Equinox development mailing list cc Subject Re: [equinox-dev] [sec] questions about EE for security Both John and Rem are correct. Bundles which want to run on a smaller EE tha

Re: [equinox-dev] [sec] questions about EE for security

2007-11-01 Thread Thomas Watson
quinox development mailing list Date: 10/31/2007 09:30 PM Subject: Re: [equinox-dev] [sec] questions about

Re: [equinox-dev] [sec] questions about EE for security

2007-10-31 Thread John Arthorne
/2007 05:53 PM Please respond to Equinox development mailing list To Equinox development mailing list cc Subject [equinox-dev] [sec] questions about EE for security Hi Folks, Some questions: I thought I understood (from Equinox Summit) that the recently approved minimum EE for Equinox 3

Re: [equinox-dev] [sec] questions about EE for security

2007-10-31 Thread Remy Chi Jian Suen
On 10/31/07, Scott Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Right, so bundles that require those packages to compile or run would have > to specify EE of JRE 1.4 (or higher)...in other words they can't specifiy > 1.1 and be assured of getting those optional packages. Please correct if > this is wrong i

Re: [equinox-dev] [sec] questions about EE for security

2007-10-31 Thread Scott Lewis
Remy Chi Jian Suen wrote: On 10/31/07, Scott Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I understand this, as the JAAS work depends upon packages like javax.security.auth, and javax.security.auth.login, etc. which do not seem to be in CDC 1.1/Foundation 1.1. Those packages are marked as "option

Re: [equinox-dev] [sec] questions about EE for security

2007-10-31 Thread Remy Chi Jian Suen
On 10/31/07, Scott Lewis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I understand this, as the JAAS > work depends upon packages like javax.security.auth, and > javax.security.auth.login, etc. which do not seem to be in CDC > 1.1/Foundation 1.1. Those packages are marked as "optional". I don't know how that all

[equinox-dev] [sec] questions about EE for security

2007-10-31 Thread Scott Lewis
Hi Folks, Some questions: I thought I understood (from Equinox Summit) that the recently approved minimum EE for Equinox 3.4 (Ganymede) was CDC 1.1/Foundation 1.1. I see from looking at the equinox JAAS integration bundles (e.g. org.eclipse.equinox.security.auth) that the runtime environmen