>>
>>
>>
>> *"Arthur van Dorp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>*
>> Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>
>> 09/14/2007 01:20 AM
>> Please respond to
>> Equinox development mailing list
>>
>>
>>
>> To
&g
*"Arthur van Dorp" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>*
> Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> 09/14/2007 01:20 AM
> Please respond to
> Equinox development mailing list
>
>
>
> To
> "Equinox development mailing list"
> cc
>
> Subject
EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
09/14/2007 01:20 AM
Please respond to
Equinox development mailing list
To
"Equinox development mailing list"
cc
Subject
AW: [equinox-dev] Equinox->Bundles component is getting crowded
> The challenge is that all
>
BJ Hargrave wrote on 09/13/2007 03:13:56 PM:
> > Why not reify the structure we think we have?
>
> I think part of the issue is that there is no common view of the
structure
> "we think we have" to reify it.
I agree that there is likely no common view currently. That does not mean
there cann
lla
> components and N commit right sets with M >=N. Right now (for bundles)
M
> and N both equal 1. Are we looking to increase M or N or both?
> --
>
> BJ Hargrave
> Senior Technical Staff Member, IBM
> OSGi Fellow and CTO of the OSGi Alliance
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
&g
and CTO of the OSGi Alliance
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> office: +1 386 848 1781
> mobile: +1 386 848 3788
>
>
>
>
> From:
> Jeff McAffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Equinox development mailing list
> Date:
> 2007-09-13 09:04
> Subject:
> Re: [equinox-de
the OSGi Alliance
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
office: +1 386 848 1781
mobile: +1 386 848 3788
From:
Jeff McAffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Equinox development mailing list
Date:
2007-09-13 09:04
Subject:
Re: [equinox-dev] Equinox->Bundles component is getting crowded
to me it is neither of t
e: +1 386 848 1781
mobile: +1 386 848 3788
From:
Jeff McAffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Equinox development mailing list
Date:
2007-09-12 16:03
Subject:
Re: [equinox-dev] Equinox->Bundles component is getting crowded
yes but under the new plan you pointed out, the commit rights will be
om:
Jeff McAffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Equinox development mailing list
Date:
2007-09-12 16:03
Subject:
Re: [equinox-dev] Equinox->Bundles component is getting crowded
yes but under the new plan you pointed out, the commit rights will be
managed by groups and groups will have a 1:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 2007-09-12 16:01:05:
>
> BJ Hargrave wrote on 09/12/2007 03:33:59 PM:
>
> > I am not sure this is true. According to portal.eclipse.org, I am a
> > committer on eclipse, eclipse.equinox and eclipse.incubator. Thus it
would
> > seem to me we only need to elect one to
OTECTED]
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
09/12/2007 03:42 PM
Please respond to
Equinox development mailing list
To
Equinox development mailing list
cc
Subject
Re: [equinox-dev] Equinox->Bundles component is getting crowded
Since "component" is a confusing term, I should clarify
BJ Hargrave wrote on 09/12/2007 03:33:59 PM:
> I am not sure this is true. According to portal.eclipse.org, I am a
> committer on eclipse, eclipse.equinox and eclipse.incubator. Thus it
would
> seem to me we only need to elect one to eclipse.equinox to have commit
> rights to all the framework
uinox development mailing list
cc
Subject
Re: [equinox-dev] Equinox->Bundles component is getting crowded
I agree one component per bundle is probably overkill. However, it's not
necessarily true that the CVS commit groups match 1-1 with Bugzilla
groups. While it's oft
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 2007-09-12 14:47:42:
> There are two extreme positions to take. Lump a large number of
> loosely related deliverables under one component or create a
> separate component for each and every deliverable. I'm not sure I
> favor the latter extreme. Currently the Equinox
07 02:50 PM
Subject:Re: [equinox-dev] Equinox->Bundles component is g
espond to
Equinox development mailing list
To
Equinox development mailing list
cc
Subject
Re: [equinox-dev] Equinox->Bundles component is getting crowded
It would probably be best if each separately downloadable item had its own
component against which people could file bugs.
--
BJ
1 386 848 3788
From:
Thomas Watson/Austin/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Equinox development mailing list
Date:
2007-09-12 12:34
Subject:
Re: [equinox-dev] Equinox->Bundles component is getting crowded
For the security stuff I was referring to the security-specific bundles
like login (JAAS integrati
:
Thomas Watson/Austin/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:
Equinox development mailing list
Date:
2007-09-12 12:34
Subject:
Re: [equinox-dev] Equinox->Bundles component is getting crowded
For the security stuff I was referring to the security-specific bundles
like login (JAAS integration etc.)
You are right th
D] equinox-dev@eclipse.org
cc
09/12/2007 11:42 AM Subject
[equinox-dev] Equinox->Bundles
TECTED]
09/12/2007 11:42 AM
Please respond to
Equinox development mailing list
To
equinox-dev@eclipse.org
cc
Subject
[equinox-dev] Equinox->Bundles component is getting crowded
The Equinox project continues to grow with new components and new
contributes being added. Thanks everyone!!
The Equinox project continues to grow with new components and new
contributes being added. Thanks everyone!!
As new contributions are graduated into Equinox proper we need to place
them under one of the existing components. Currently we have the
"Framework" and "Bundles" components for Equinox
21 matches
Mail list logo
