Re: [equinox-dev] [vote] graduating the new jar processor bundle

2007-09-10 Thread Jeff McAffer
development mailing list To Equinox development mailing list cc Subject Re: [equinox-dev] [vote] graduating the new jar processor bundle I'm not sure it will be necessary to use JarProcessor for this. The main benefit of using the JarProcessor is when doing modifications recursivel

Re: [equinox-dev] [vote] graduating the new jar processor bundle

2007-09-10 Thread John Arthorne
Equinox development mailing list To Equinox development mailing list cc Subject Re: [equinox-dev] [vote] graduating the new jar processor bundle +1 As for doing it now, is there any benefit to waiting? There is some amount of work that will depend on this change. Both update.co

Re: [equinox-dev] [vote] graduating the new jar processor bundle

2007-09-10 Thread Pascal Rapicault
: [equinox-dev] [vote] graduating the new jar processor bundle +1 As for doing it now, is there any benefit to waiting? There is some amount of

Re: [equinox-dev] [vote] graduating the new jar processor bundle

2007-09-10 Thread Thomas Watson
away are not clear to me. +0 PaScaL From: Jeff McAffer/Ottawa/[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: equinox-dev@eclipse.org Date: 09/09/2007 11:07 PM Subject: [equinox-dev] [vote] graduating the new jar processor bundle As you may know, we used to have the JARProcessor

Re: [equinox-dev] [vote] graduating the new jar processor bundle

2007-09-10 Thread Andrew Niefer
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/10/2007 09:54 AM Please respond to Equinox development mailing list To Equinox development mailing list cc Subject Re: [equinox-dev] [vote] graduating the new jar processor bundle In the long, there is no discussion about doing this change. However the benefits of

Re: [equinox-dev] [vote] graduating the new jar processor bundle

2007-09-10 Thread Simon Kaegi
+1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 09/09/2007 11:05:07 PM: > > As you may know, we used to have the JARProcessor embedded in the > bowels of Update manager. Turns out that there are several uses for > the processor (pack200 support, signing, verifying, ...) and having > this function as a stand-alone

Re: [equinox-dev] [vote] graduating the new jar processor bundle

2007-09-10 Thread John Arthorne
McAffer/Ottawa/[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/09/2007 11:05 PM Please respond to Equinox development mailing list To equinox-dev@eclipse.org cc Subject [equinox-dev] [vote] graduating the new jar processor bundle As you may know, we used to have the JARProcessor embedded in

Re: [equinox-dev] [vote] graduating the new jar processor bundle

2007-09-10 Thread Pascal Rapicault
Subject:[equinox-dev] [vote] graduating the new jar processor bundle

Re: [equinox-dev] [vote] graduating the new jar processor bundle

2007-09-10 Thread DJ Houghton
+1 Jeff McAffer/Ottawa/IB [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [equinox-dev] [vote] graduating the new jar processor bundle

2007-09-09 Thread David R Stevenson
lots of opportunities for exploiting jar processor +1 - Dave Jeff McAffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED] 09/09/2007 08:05 PM Please respond to Equinox development mailing list To equinox-dev@eclipse.org cc Subject [equinox-dev] [vote] graduating the n

[equinox-dev] [vote] graduating the new jar processor bundle

2007-09-09 Thread Jeff McAffer
As you may know, we used to have the JARProcessor embedded in the bowels of Update manager. Turns out that there are several uses for the processor (pack200 support, signing, verifying, ...) and having this function as a stand-alone bundle would be "a good thing"(tm). So in the p2 work we did