Le 21/12/2012 20:19, Tom Van Cutsem a écrit :
Given that there are plenty of cases where the configurable:true
contract is violated (i.e. non-deletable configurable properties),
and that it is still possible to fix the 3 violations of the
configurable:false contract, I think I'm swayed to
I never fully understood why the arguments object couldn't be an array, and I
know there is at least an attempted purge of the arguments object from the
language with the addition of rest parameters.. But, for the transitional
period, can the arguments object have an @@iterator property?
On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Nathan Wall nathan.w...@live.com wrote:
I never fully understood why the arguments object couldn't be an array,
and I know there is at least an attempted purge of the arguments object
from the language with the addition of rest parameters.. But, for the
That's great news! Thank you!
Nathan
On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 4:57 PM, Nathan Wall
nathan.w...@live.commailto:nathan.w...@live.com wrote:
I never fully understood why the arguments object couldn't be an array,
and I know there is at least an attempted purge of the arguments object
from
It's good this will be added (no reason not to) but I'll note that is much
less of a requirement to even use the arguments object at all, especially
iteration use cases that are pretty much filled by rest. In fact (almost?)
the only place I've actually referenced the arguments object is to count
Parameter default values weren't good enough for this?
[[[Sent from a mobile device. Please forgive brevity and typos.]]]
Dr. Axel Rauschmayer
a...@rauschma.de
Home: http://rauschma.de
Blog: http://2ality.com
On 22.12.2012, at 23:57, Brandon Benvie bran...@brandonbenvie.com wrote:
It's good
6 matches
Mail list logo
