In-Reply-To= 5B36C364-13FF-44AA-9B01-4ABC25AB4D65%40wirfs-brock.com
Regarding the .jsm suggestion, a colleague suggested .es, no need
for the m as you could say all ES files are modules.
___
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 11:26 PM, Brendan Eich bren...@mozilla.com wrote:
David Sheets wrote:
. Old browsers ignore the new attribute will process the content, which
could be written to work both ways.
Is a new attribute necessary? What about using @type?
Old browsers will ignore
David Sheets wrote:
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 11:26 PM, Brendan Eichbren...@mozilla.com wrote:
David Sheets wrote:
. Old browsers ignore the new attribute will process the content, which
could be written to work both ways.
Is a new attribute necessary? What about using @type?
On Mon, Jan 27, 2014 at 1:29 AM, Brendan Eich bren...@mozilla.com wrote:
David Sheets wrote:
On Sat, Jan 25, 2014 at 11:26 PM, Brendan Eichbren...@mozilla.com
wrote:
David Sheets wrote:
. Old browsers ignore the new attribute will process the content,
which
could be written
Is a new attribute necessary? What about using @type?
Old browsers will ignore unknown types, losing the two-way fallback option.
Two-way fallback? Why is that important? Since modules are implicitly
strict, there is little intersection between scripts and modules.
David Sheets wrote:
There is no out-of-band metadata in a new script attribute. Attributes are
data, not data-about-data, and in-band in HTML.
The channel is the contents of the script element or the ES resource.
The attribute is not transmitted in the contents of the script element
or ES
Kevin Smith wrote:
Is a new attribute necessary? What about using @type?
Old browsers will ignore unknown types, losing the two-way
fallback option.
Two-way fallback? Why is that important? Since modules are
implicitly strict, there is little intersection between scripts
Once you focus on inline bodies, you face harsh adoption barriers without
enabling works-in-old-and-new coding.
OK, I follow.
___
es-discuss mailing list
es-discuss@mozilla.org
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
8 matches
Mail list logo