Re: Suggestion: Destructuring object initializer.

A big thing in a programming language for me is "glanceability" (ability to glance at code and discern roughly what's going on). Allowing destructuring braces to be mixed in object literals may well be a natural extension of destructuring: I'm not denying that. I just think that since they

Re: Proposal to add keyword "nowait"

I just considered this proposal in a context of `node.js` environment. I write microservices which execute requests to database and other microservices. All such requests are asynchronous. Therefore I execute them in body of async function. And sometimes I forget to add `await` for such

Re: Proposal to add keyword "nowait"

Yes, I was mistaken. That is possible only to do via type checking systems. it's not work of javascript of the interpreter. Thanks for explanations. > 12 февр. 2018 г., в 10:32, T.J. Crowder > написал(а): > > Previous discussion: >

Re: Proposal to add keyword "nowait"

Previous discussion: https://esdiscuss.org/topic/async-await-await-async-a-simpler-less-error-prone-async-syntax -- T.J. Crowder On Mon, Feb 12, 2018 at 6:29 AM, Александр Ефремов wrote: > Sorry, but I didn’t understand you sentence. And I have knowledge in the > promises

Re: Proposal to add keyword "nowait"

Sorry, but I didn’t understand you sentence. And I have knowledge in the promises of course. > 12 февр. 2018 г., в 9:59, Isiah Meadows написал(а): > > Yeah, and given it's the default, I'm not persuaded of the benefit to be > gained here. > > (Most feature requests

Re: Proposal to add keyword "nowait"

Yeah, and given it's the default, I'm not persuaded of the benefit to be gained here. (Most feature requests like these in my experience come from such users who use `async`/`await` without learning promises first. Without that knowledge, people typically don't get that it's merely syntax sugar

Re: Re: Proposal to add keyword "nowait"

Yes, agree that it doesn't backwards compatible. But type checking systems (like typescript and flow) it's overhead for fast development. ___ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss

Re: Proposal to add keyword "nowait"

This certainly doesn't sound backwards compatible. Also, this is something that type checking systems (like typescript and flow) are very good at catching. On Feb 11, 2018 22:41, "Александр Ефремов" wrote: > Sometimes when create the async functions forget to add await and

Proposal to add keyword "nowait"

Sometimes when create the async functions forget to add await and later such mistake difficult to find. Maybe would be better always demand to add keyword nowait to calls returning promises which we don't plan to wait. But if this keyword and await keyword no exists then throw the

Re: Suggestion: Destructuring object initializer.

I had the same concern at first about confusing the destructuring braces with a nested object literal. After looking at it some more it seems like a natural extension of destructuring assignment. ___ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org

Re: Suggestion: Destructuring object initializer.

inline counter-rant. > On Feb 8, 2018, at 9:04 PM, Bob Myers wrote: > > It does make one stop and wonder why the group will endlessly entertain > trolls debating whether or not ES6 (or ES5) portends the end of civilization > as we know it, while relentlessly ignoring literally