> I think it's possible to find someone who will represent the will of
community.
Individuals can compose the code right now.
> At the moment the question is does community have will to add proposed
sugar to the language, and if so, which version.
Why would there be any restriction on the
True
I think it's possible to find someone who will represent the will of
community.
At the moment the question is does community have will to add proposed
sugar to the language, and if so, which version.
ср, 29 мая 2019 г. в 22:30, Oriol _ :
> If you want to add this you will need a champion,
If you want to add this you will need a champion, see
https://github.com/tc39/ecma262/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#new-feature-proposals
-- Oriol
El 29/5/19 a les 21:15, Григорий Карелин ha escrit:
I agree.
So, what does community think? Do we want to have “destructuring picking” sugar
in JS
I agree.
So, what does community think? Do we want to have “destructuring picking”
sugar in JS and if we do, which syntax looks more attractive?
I’d suggest to vote.
On Wed, 29 May 2019 at 21:55, Bob Myers wrote:
> This syntax merely combines and extends two existing notations:
>
> 1. Dot
This syntax merely combines and extends two existing notations:
1. Dot notation to access properties, which has been in JS since it was
initially designed, with the RHS extended to permit a *set* of properties
in `{}` in addition to a plain old identifier as at present.
2. Property spread
Well, I guess it might work too.
I personally like more verbose constructions, with keywords instead of
dots, asterisks, etc :)
On Wed, 29 May 2019 at 21:03, Bob Myers wrote:
> On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 10:28 AM Григорий Карелин
> wrote:
>
>> Hi Cyril,
>> With the syntax you propose what would
On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 10:28 AM Григорий Карелин
wrote:
> Hi Cyril,
> With the syntax you propose what would be the way to to this:
> ```
> const source = {foo: 1, bar: 2};
> const result = {foo: source.foo, bar: source.bar, buzz: 3}
> ```
> ?
>
As already mentioned earlier in this thread:
Hi Cyril,
With the syntax you propose what would be the way to to this:
```
const source = {foo: 1, bar: 2};
const result = {foo: source.foo, bar: source.bar, buzz: 3}
```
?
ср, 29 мая 2019 г. в 20:14, Cyril Auburtin :
> What I'd like is this syntax:
>
> ```js
> let o={a:1, b:2, c:3};
> o.{a, b}
What I'd like is this syntax:
```js
let o={a:1, b:2, c:3};
o.{a, b} // would be {a: 1, b: 2}
```
On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 9:13 PM Григорий Карелин wrote:
> Here are another examples, where "destructuring picking" I suggest whould
> be helpful.
> ==1A Now (redux related)
> ```
> function
9 matches
Mail list logo
