I agree. So, what does community think? Do we want to have “destructuring picking” sugar in JS and if we do, which syntax looks more attractive?
I’d suggest to vote. On Wed, 29 May 2019 at 21:55, Bob Myers <[email protected]> wrote: > This syntax merely combines and extends two existing notations: > > 1. Dot notation to access properties, which has been in JS since it was > initially designed, with the RHS extended to permit a *set* of properties > in `{}` in addition to a plain old identifier as at present. > 2. Property spread notation (`{...{}}`). > > On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 11:27 AM Григорий Карелин <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Well, I guess it might work too. >> >> I personally like more verbose constructions, with keywords instead of >> dots, asterisks, etc :) >> >> On Wed, 29 May 2019 at 21:03, Bob Myers <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> On Wed, May 29, 2019 at 10:28 AM Григорий Карелин <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Cyril, >>>> With the syntax you propose what would be the way to to this: >>>> ``` >>>> const source = {foo: 1, bar: 2}; >>>> const result = {foo: source.foo, bar: source.bar, buzz: 3} >>>> ``` >>>> ? >>>> >>> >>> As already mentioned earlier in this thread: >>> >>> ```js >>> const source = {foo: 1, bar: 2}; >>> const result = {...source.{foo, bar}, buzz: 3}; >>> ``` >>> >> -- >> Отправлено с мобильного устройства >> > -- Отправлено с мобильного устройства
_______________________________________________ es-discuss mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss
