On 16 July 2015 at 15:21, Bob Myers r...@gol.com wrote:
With all do respect, none of this syntax tinkering makes any sense to me.
I've been programming JS for 15 years and never noticed I needed a try
block that returns a value.
Long ago I programmed in a language called AED that had valued
With all do respect, none of this syntax tinkering makes any sense to me.
I've been programming JS for 15 years and never noticed I needed a try
block that returns a value.
Long ago I programmed in a language called AED that had valued blockl,
which I was quite fond of, but never felt the need
I echo this. E is a dynamic language with many similarities with JS,
including a similarly C-like syntax. In E I use
everything-is-a-pattern-or-expression all the time. When I first moved to
JS I missed it. Now that I am used to the JS statements-are-not-expressions
restrictions, I no longer do,
Mark S. Miller wrote:
I echo this. E is a dynamic language with many similarities with JS,
including a similarly C-like syntax. In E I use
everything-is-a-pattern-or-expression all the time. When I first moved
to JS I missed it. Now that I am used to the JS
statements-are-not-expressions
Herby Vojčík wrote:
Mark S. Miller wrote:
I echo this. E is a dynamic language with many similarities with JS,
including a similarly C-like syntax. In E I use
everything-is-a-pattern-or-expression all the time. When I first moved
to JS I missed it. Now that I am used to the JS
5 matches
Mail list logo