2012/9/11 Mark S. Miller erig...@google.com
[...]
If we change this API from returning an array of strings to returning an
iterator, I agree that alters the balance and justifies waiving this
particular guarantee.
I also don't see any real issues with waiving the duplicate names check.
It's
Thank you very much for your answers.
I thought it was possible to save data from server with ecmascript, that
why I post it here. I'm gonna search through your weblinks.
Thank you for your advices,
Mr
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 6:59 PM, Russell Leggett
russell.legg...@gmail.comwrote:
This
Le 12/09/2012 08:19, Tom Van Cutsem a écrit :
2012/9/11 Mark S. Miller erig...@google.com mailto:erig...@google.com
[...]
If we change this API from returning an array of strings to
returning an iterator, I agree that alters the balance and
justifies waiving this particular
2012/9/12 David Bruant bruan...@gmail.com
[...]
For the second check, I'd like to note a couple of implementation details
which are relevant I think. First, as you suggest, the set of minimum
reported properties has to be decided before the first iteration
(otherwise, this set may change
Kevin Smith wrote:
function f(x) {
console.log(x);
if (truthy()) {
with ({x: 'ha ha'}) {
var x = 'ho ho';
console.log(x);
}
}
function x(){}
console.log(x);
}
In these cases there is
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 3:44 PM, Tom Van Cutsem tomvc...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't know the exact rules of module instance objects. Is it possible to
reify the same module as multiple distinct instance objects in the same
module loader context, or does the loader context cache a single instance
Allen Wirfs-Brock wrote:
The initializing generator arguments thread and related discussions
has got me questioning our use of function declaration/expression
syntax as our basis for defining generators. Changing this would be a
departure from what Firefox has supported in recent years, but
Dmitry Soshnikov wrote:
On Tue, Sep 11, 2012 at 1:33 AM, Brendan Eich bren...@mozilla.com
mailto:bren...@mozilla.com wrote:
If you really want the Pythonic default parameter rules
(evaluation in definition context) then you need to address the
bad case Jason showed:
Contrived example has contrived error. Sorry, this is really not fairly
argued or evidence-based.
Generators are the easiest way to write an iterator implementation.
Typically iterator implementations are named, reusable. The better way
to write anything like the mutable collection snapshot
Allen, even with all the requirements you listed, I wouldn't write
that example code. There's a more natural way to factor the problem.
The original example fails for at least the last bullet. To fix that, it
would have to be rewritten, something like:
function dataSnapshot(aDataSource) {
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 1:27 AM, David Bruant bruan...@gmail.com wrote:
[...] There are numerous examples where ES5 assumptions are questioned
by proxies, like:
for(var p in obj){
var desc = Object.getOwnPropertyDescriptor(obj, p)
// ...
}
In this snippet, ES5
ES5 section 15.9.1 specifies a number of operations to map time values
(measured in milliseconds from January 1, 1970, midnight UTC) to
year/month/day/hour/minute/second values, and the ECMAScript
Internationalization API specification section 12.3.2 mandates use of these
algorithms also for
Mark https://plus.google.com/114199149796022210033
*
*
*— Il meglio è l’inimico del bene —*
**
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 8:43 PM, Norbert Lindenberg
ecmascr...@norbertlindenberg.com wrote:
ES5 section 15.9.1 specifies a number of operations to map time values
(measured in milliseconds from
+Peter, since he has an interest in these issues.
Mark https://plus.google.com/114199149796022210033
*
*
*— Il meglio è l’inimico del bene —*
**
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 9:37 PM, Mark Davis ☕ m...@macchiato.com wrote:
Mark https://plus.google.com/114199149796022210033
*
*
*— Il meglio è
14 matches
Mail list logo
