On 27 Nov 2013, at 3:29 , Brendan Eich bren...@mozilla.com wrote:
[...] also some future-hostility to function! wanting =! (remember ! is a
unary prefix operator). Other spellings all have ASI or other
future-hostility woes.
What is `function!` ? Or will that be explained in the meeting
It is one proposed syntax for async functions.
On Nov 27, 2013 6:20 AM, Axel Rauschmayer a...@rauschma.de wrote:
On 27 Nov 2013, at 3:29 , Brendan Eich bren...@mozilla.com wrote:
[...] also some future-hostility to function! wanting =! (remember ! is a
unary prefix operator). Other spellings
I found this relevant to some previous discussions:
https://github.com/feross/native-buffer-browserify/commit/18c6784277e25db01ee145e5dfaaf23bb5b311fc
The native-buffer-browserify is an attempt to provide a typed array-based
version of Node.js's Buffer interface [1]. (Buffer is something that
Hey Domenic,
thanks for bringing this up. IIUC, extensible typed arrays have been
decided on, so we will implement them. CCing Niko, who is working on typed
arrays and typed objects.
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 2:56 PM, Domenic Denicola
dome...@domenicdenicola.com wrote:
I found this relevant to
# Nov 20 Meeting Notes
John Neumann (JN), Allen Wirfs-Brock (AWB), Yehuda Katz (YK), Eric
Ferraiuolo (EF), Erik Arvidsson (EA), Rick Hudson (RH), Matt Sweeney (MS),
Rick Waldron (RW), Dmitry Soshnikov (DS), Sebastian Markbage (SM), Ben
Newman (BN), Reid Burke (RB), Waldemar Horwat (WH), Doug
# Nov 19 Meeting Notes
John Neumann (JN), Allen Wirfs-Brock (AWB), Yehuda Katz (YK), Eric
Ferraiuolo (EF), Erik Arvidsson (EA), Rick Hudson (RH), Matt Sweeney (MS),
Rafael Weinstein (RWS), Alex Russell (AR), Rick Waldron (RW), Dmitry
Soshnikov (DS), Jeff Morrison (JM), Sebastian Markbage (SM),
Le 27/11/2013 19:14, Rick Waldron a écrit :
# Nov 19 Meeting Notes
## 4.4 Finalizing the Proxy API for ES6
(Presented by Tom Van Cutsem)
(...)
DS: What is typeof and instanceof
AWB/BE: object
BE: Capital P
AWB: Ca???
DS: Whatever Proxy creates?
BE: That depends on what is created.
DS:
I wasn't there on day 2 so I may be lacking context, but I'd like to
clarify some parts in the notes re. proxies and Function.prototype.bind:
2013/11/27 Rick Waldron waldron.r...@gmail.com
EA: What happens when do bind on a function proxy?
MM: fail?
DH: This is shocking.
MM: bind is a
2013/11/27 David Bruant bruan...@gmail.com
Le 27/11/2013 19:14, Rick Waldron a écrit :
BE: typeof depends if there is a call trap. instanceof depends on the
prototype chain. All in the spec, so can create any object (apart from
private state issues)
Shouldn't it depend on the target's
Thanks, Tom -- your whole bulleted list looks good, but in particular:
Tom Van Cutsem wrote:
(the current draft does lose the ability for a proxy to transparently
retain a non-standard typeof value. AFAICT, typeof proxy will always
either return object or function)
This seems right. Any
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 10:15 AM, Rick Waldron waldron.r...@gmail.comwrote:
# Nov 20 Meeting Notes
Consensus/Resolution
- Remove Object.mixin
- toMethod() wins -- debate about argument order
Function.prototype.toMethod(home[, mname])
A small observation: the toMethod is
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 5:49 PM, Dmitry Soshnikov
dmitry.soshni...@gmail.com wrote:
.toMethod(Array, 'toString'); // to (instance/proto) method
That does not seem like the lowest level of primitive since now there is no
way to no pass an ordinary object as the [[HomeObject]]. Now I have to
Will you also be citing ECMA-404 normatively to avoid this sort of
divergence in the future?
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 4:13 PM, Tim Bray tb...@textuality.com wrote:
To do this, I think the draft requires these changes:
- Remove the trailing section of section 1.2, starting with “ECMAscript
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 4:53 PM, Erik Arvidsson erik.arvids...@gmail.comwrote:
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 5:49 PM, Dmitry Soshnikov
dmitry.soshni...@gmail.com wrote:
.toMethod(Array, 'toString'); // to (instance/proto) method
That does not seem like the lowest level of primitive since now
14 matches
Mail list logo
