On Fri, Feb 14, 2014 at 10:50 PM, C. Scott Ananian
ecmascr...@cscott.net wrote:
Since both Chrome and FIrefox have plans to support Promises, feel
free to suggest any changes to `es6-shim` which would improve
compatibility. It looks like that at the moment the `es6-shim`
implementation is
Aside: ECMASpeak is neither accurate (we don't work for Ecma, it's JS
not ES :-P), nor euphonious. But here's a pointer:
C. Scott Ananian wrote:
new string object.
new string primitive, because string object (especially with new
in front) suggests new String('hi').
/be
On 14 Feb 2014, at 19:59, Allen Wirfs-Brock al...@wirfs-brock.com wrote:
It's a really high bar to get over that closed gate. Unless the exclusion of
a feature was a mistake […] I don't think we should be talking about adding
it to ES6.
It does feel like a mistake to me to introduce
On Feb 15, 2014 9:13 AM, Brendan Eich bren...@mozilla.com wrote:
Aside: ECMASpeak is neither accurate (we don't work for Ecma, it's JS
not ES :-P), nor euphonious.
I'm learning all sorts of things! I guess there are two names here; what's
your preferred phrase for the language used to write
4 matches
Mail list logo