Re: LR(1) grammar/parser and lookahead-restrictions

2017-02-07 Thread Waldemar Horwat
On 02/07/2017 06:39, Michael Dyck wrote: On 17-02-06 07:32 PM, Waldemar Horwat wrote: On 02/04/2017 07:20, Michael Dyck wrote: On 17-02-03 05:32 PM, Waldemar Horwat wrote: On 02/03/2017 08:17, Michael Dyck wrote: On 17-02-02 06:23 PM, Waldemar Horwat wrote: Lookahead restrictions fit very

Re: Array Comprehensions

2017-02-07 Thread kdex
AFAIK, only TC39 members can champion a proposal. If you're not a member, you could still write a proposal and hope that some TC39 member is interested in championing it. On Tuesday, February 7, 2017 5:05:49 PM CET Ryan Birmingham wrote: > It wasn't clear from the documentation; who can or

Re: Array Comprehensions

2017-02-07 Thread Ryan Birmingham
It wasn't clear from the documentation; who can or cannot be a champion? -Ryan Birmingham On 7 February 2017 at 10:49, Bob Myers wrote: > On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 6:58 PM, David Bruant wrote: > >> At the very least, the proposal will be listed in the stage 0

Re: LR(1) grammar/parser and lookahead-restrictions

2017-02-07 Thread Isiah Meadows
Just out of curiosity, what's the best way to handle async arrow function arguments vs `async` function calls? Is it term rewriting, or is there a better way of handling that? I'm much more familiar with recursive-descent and LL parsers than LR or shift-reduce ones, so I'm not as readily familiar

Re: Array Comprehensions

2017-02-07 Thread Bob Myers
On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 6:58 PM, David Bruant wrote: > At the very least, the proposal will be listed in the stage 0 proposals > list [3]. My understanding is that a champion is required even to become stage 0. ___ es-discuss

Re: LR(1) grammar/parser and lookahead-restrictions

2017-02-07 Thread Michael Dyck
On 17-02-06 07:32 PM, Waldemar Horwat wrote: On 02/04/2017 07:20, Michael Dyck wrote: On 17-02-03 05:32 PM, Waldemar Horwat wrote: On 02/03/2017 08:17, Michael Dyck wrote: On 17-02-02 06:23 PM, Waldemar Horwat wrote: Lookahead restrictions fit very well into an LR(1) engine Again: Great,

Re: Array Comprehensions

2017-02-07 Thread David Bruant
Le 06/02/2017 à 17:59, Ryan Birmingham a écrit : Hello all, I frequently find myself desiring a short array or generator comprehension syntax. I'm aware that there are functional ways around use of comprehension syntax, but I personally (at least) love the syntax in the ES reference