Suggestion: Infix operators/functions

function f(x) { } function g(y) { } (f '.' g)(x); // z ``` Thomas Grainger ___ es-discuss mailing list es-discuss@mozilla.org https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/es-discuss

Re: Cloning WeakSet/WeakMap

I think this is referring to cloning a WeakSet into another WeakSet Thomas Grainger On 9 February 2018 at 15:01, David Bruant <bruan...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > My understanding is that cloning a WeakSet into a Set would remove all its > properties related to security and

Re: Feature Proposal - async variables (like thread local storage from C)

I'm pretty sure this is Zones On 11 Mar 2018 15:35, "Guy Margalit" wrote: > Hey > > It's my first attempt to contribute to ECMAScript so would love your > feedback if I better off change how I go about it. > > The problem I want to highlight is that besides argument passing

Re: Re: Add "???" Unimplemented

const ɁɁɁ = () => { throw new Error('Method not defined'); }; Thomas Grainger On 26 March 2018 at 06:26, Isiah Meadows <isiahmead...@gmail.com> wrote: > Even in TypeScript, `never` (the type of functions that never return - > throwing ≠ returning) is the subtype of *all* types,

Re: add reverse() method to strings

String.prototype.reverse() might break web compatibility, how about String.prototype.turnyRoundy()? On 17 Mar 2018 18:47, "Claude Pache" wrote: > > > Le 17 mars 2018 à 19:29, Oriol _ a écrit : > > Be aware your code breaks pair surrogates,

Re: Proposal: if variable initialization

Is this sarcastic? On 21 Mar 2018 12:58, "kai zhu" wrote: > this is why let and const should *never* have been introduced. if we had > stuck with just var, none of these petty-arguments and bickering among > team-members/shops on scoping-styles that ultimately have *zero*

Re: Improved syntax for observable mapping and subscribing

You can convert an observable into an async iterator. You have to choose between discarding or buffering uniterated items On 23 Mar 2018 14:39, "Bob Myers" wrote: > Could someone jog my memory about proposals for better syntax for > observable mapping and subscribing, if any? > >